All References Flashcards
Biobanding is the practice of grouping youth athletes of the same biological age, based on their maturity status together for training and competitive matches
Cumming et al 2017
Players interviewed by X following a biobanded tournament were positive about the initiative, saying it was enjoyable and more competitive when trying to stand out against matched peers
Cumming et al 2017
more mature players had greater speed scores than there less mature peers, due to their biological age advantage
McCunn et al (2017)
less motivation and feel less fulfilled by their experiences of sport at this point, and leave an academy structured programme early, despite the catch up they would have later during PHV and after
Cobley et al 2017
whilst being born in the earlier quartiles is largely beneficial, it may lead to early specialisation and overuse injuries in later years
Cumming et al 2017
biobanding may impinge the development of players as a consequence of the underdog hypothesis
Gibbs et al 2012
compared younger and older karate competitors and found power outputs differed slightly only at revolution rates of 110-140 rpm, with PP achieved at 100 and 110 rpm respectively
Dzurenkova et al (1998)
compared the reliability of three cycle ergometers, against a 20s WanT in 14 8-9-year olds. They found PP, MP and time to PP mean values as well as the typical errors were very similar between the three ergometers
Williams et al (2003)
Adult data suggested that PP measured by this test was less than half the PP of polyarticular exercise
Avis (1985)
compared total work output measured by an isokinetic dynamometer to the WanT in children and found a correlation between total work of the extensors and total work in the WanT of r=0.94.
Bar-Or 1929
The WanT has been widely reviewed and shown to have good transferability of results into performance of predominately anaerobic tasks
Bar-Or 1929
reviewed the validity and repeatability of the WanT against a 30 s non-motorised treadmill sprint and found that the test outcomes were significantly correlated, suggesting it is a valid and reliable measure.
Sutton et al 2000
there is still around 16-45% contribution of the aerobic system during performance of a WanT
Chia 2006
The long-term athlete development model (LTAD) was proposed by
Balyi & Hamilton (2004)
a study by X showed individual differences in aerobic capacity (in reference to specific time point of development)
Bouchard 1997
demonstrated children can be either high or low responders to cardio-respiratory training at the same age, but showed low responders improved later as they matured instead.
Bouchard 1997`
Speed increases linearly prior to the age of 12 in both boys and girls, and then its development slows in girls compared to boys
Whittal 2003
suggested the differences in speed development in boys and girls is predominantly due to differences in growth and maturation which occur during puberty
Malina 1998
) investigated the effects of growth rates on the development of speed and power in children aged 11-13, over 9 months. They found no relationship between weight and the development of speed and power, but there was a positive relationship between these variables and height
Butterworth 2004
showed strength gains were achieved in 5-year-old
Faigenbaum 2001
showed no differences in the percentage increased of strength gain following training, when subjects at different maturational stages were the experimental population
Lillegard 1997
were the first to identify that VO2 rose in an exponential fashion in response to exercise intensity
Hill and Lupton 1923
reported faster VO2 kinetics in children compared with adults (P<0.05)
Fawkner 2002
younger children display a faster phase II rise in VO2 at the onset of moderate intensity than older children and adults
(Williams 2001)
This age-related decline in oxygen utilisation was suggested to be due to slower activation of metabolic enzymes and/or the build up of metabolic controllers; however, this relationship still remains unclear
Fawkner 2002
slowing of the VO2 kinetics could be explained by the slowing of muscle PCr kinetics during the transition from childhood to adulthood
Barker 2008
resting muscle PCr levels increase with age
Eriksson 1980
Studies have shown children to have similar recovery of muscle PCr compared to adults following a progressive maximal exercise test.
(Kuno et al. 1995)