Biostatistics Flashcards

1
Q

Continuous data

A

values that change by the same amount
2 types: ratio and interval data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ratio vs interval data

A

Interval data has no meaningful zero (e.g. celsius)
Ratio data has a meaningful zero (zero equals none, e.g. BP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discrete (categorical) data

A

Nominal, ordinal
Have categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Differences between ordinal and continuous data

A

In ordinal data, the categories do not increase by the same amount

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Measures of central tendency

A

Provide simple summaries of the data
Mean, Median, Mode

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Spread (variability) of data

A

Range
Standard deviation (how dispersed the data is from the mean)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Gaussian distributions

A

Normal (Bell-shaped)
Large sample sets of continuous data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Characteristics of a gaussian distribution

A

Symmetrical curve
Median, Median and Mode are all the same
68% of the values fall within 1 SD, 95% of the values fall within 2 SDs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What causes skewed (not symmetrical) distributions?

A

small sample size +/- outliers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is the Median a better measure of central tendency?

A

When there are outliers on a small # of values. In this case, the outliers can have a big impact on the mean.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

alpha

A

error margin
commonly 5% (0.05)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Determining CI in ratio data vs difference data

A

Difference data (mean): not significant if the CI crosses 0 (e.g. change in FEV1)

Ratio data (OR, HR, RR): not significant if the CI crosses 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CI & precision

A

Narrow CI = high precision
Wide CI = less precision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Type 1 error

A

False positives

When the alpha is set as 0.05 and the study reports a P value < 0.05, it is statistically significant and the probability of making a Type I error is 5%

**CI = 1 - alpha (type 1 error)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Type II error

A

Denoted as beta (B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

power

A

Power to avoid a type II error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How is power determined?

A

of outcomes
Difference in outcome rates
Significance (Alpha) level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Relative risk

A

risk in treatment group/risk in control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Interpret a RR of 57%

A

Patients in the treatment group were 57% as likely to have the outcome as the placebo group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Relative risk reduction

A

1-RR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Interpret a RRR of 0.43

A

Patients in the treatment group were 43% less likely to have the outcome than the placebo group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Absolute risk reduction

A

(% risk in the control group) - (% risk in the treatment group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Interpret a ARR of 12%

A

It means that 12 out of a 100 patients will benefit from the treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Number needed to treat

A

1/ARR
Always round up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
NNH
**Always round down**
26
In what type of studies is odds ratio used?
Used in case-control studies to estimate the risk of unfavorable events
27
OR calcuation
AD/BC
28
Hazard ratio
Used in survival analysis Rate at which an unfavorable event occurs over a short period of time
29
HR formula
HR (treatment group)/HR(control group)
30
Interpret a HR of 2
Means that there are twice as many deaths in the treatment group
31
Interpret a HR of 0.5
Means that there are half as many deaths in the treatment group
32
When are parametric tests appropriate?
When data is normally distributed
33
When are nonparametric tests appropriate?
When data is NOT normally distributed
34
Parametric test for 1 group (continuous data)
One-sample T-test
35
parametric test for 1 group (with before & after measurements) (continuous data)
Dependent/paired t-test
36
parametric test for 2 groups (continuous data)
Independent/unpaired student t-test
37
parametric test for ≥ 3 groups (continuous data)
ANOVA (or F-test)
38
Discrete/Categorical test for 1 group
Chi-square test
39
Discrete/Categorical test for 2 groups
Chi-square test or fisher's exact test
40
Correlation vs regression
Correlation - one variable Regression - used to assess multiple independent variables or if there is a need to control many confounding factors
41
Sensitivity
The true positive 100% sensitive test will be positive in ALL patients with the disease
42
Specificity
The true negative 100% specific test will be negative in all patients without the disease
43
Sensitivity formula
A (positive, have condition)/ A + C (negative, have condition)
44
Specific formula
D (Negative, no condition)/B(positive, no condition) + D
45
Interpret: sensitivity of 28%
Means that only 28% of the patients with the condition will have a positive result, but, 72% of patients with the disease can test negative (missed diagnosis)
46
Interpret: specificity of 87%
Test is negative in 87% of patients without the disease, but 13% without the disease can test positive (incorrect diagnosis)
47
Intention-to-treat vs per-protocol study
ITT: includes data for all patients originally allocated to each treatment group even if the patient did not complete the trial according to the study protocol PP: analysis completed for only those that completed the study according to the protocol
48
Equivalence vs non-inferiority trials
Equivalence: same effect as reference Non-inferiority: no worse than reference
49
Boxes in a meta-analysis
Show the effect estimate **Size of the box correlate with the size of the effects from the single study shown**
50
Diamonds in a meta-analysis
Represent pooled results from multiple studies. Wider the diamond, the less reliable the study results.
51
Horizontal lines in a meta-analysis
Illustrate the length of the confidence interval. The longer the line, the wider the interval and less reliable the study results
52
vertical solid line in a meta-analysis
Line of no effect "0" for difference data "1" for ratio data
53
Case-Control study: description
Compares patients w/ a disease (cases) to those without the disease (control). The outcome of the cases and controls are already known, but the researcher looks back in time to see if a relationship exists b/w outcome and risk factors
54
Case-Control study: benefits
Data easy to collect Good for looking at outcomes when intervention is unethical Cheap
55
Case-Control study: limitations
Cause & effect cannot be reliably be determined
56
Cohort study: description
Compares outcomes of a group of patients exposed and not exposed to a treatment. Researcher follows both prospectively or retrospectively to see if they develop the outcome.
57
Cohort study: benefits
Looking at outcomes when the intervention is unethical
58
Cohort study: limitations
influenced by confounders more time-consuming and expensive than a retrospective study
59
Cross-Sectional survey
Estimates the relationship b/w variables & outcomes (prevalence) at one particular time (cross-section) in a defined population
60
Case report and case series
Case report - unique condition/ADR that appears in a single patient Case series - same but in a few patients
61
Case reports/series: benefits
Can identify new diseases, drug side effects, or potential uses Generates hypothesis that can be treated with other study designs
62
Case reports/series: limitations
Conclusions cannot be drawn from a few cases
63
Pharmacoeconomic research
Identifies, measures and compares the costs (direct, indirect & intangible) and the consequences (clinical, economic and humanistic) of pharmaceutical products and services
64
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Used to compare the clinical effects of 2+ interventions to the respective costs
65
Cost-minimization analysis (CMA)
Used when 2+ interventions have demonstrated equivalence in outcomes and costs of each are compared
66
Cost-utility analysis
Includes a quality-of-life component of morbidity assessments, using common health indices such as QALYs and DALYs
67
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
Comparing benefits & costs of an intervention in terms of monetary units (dollars)
68
ECHO model
Economic, clinical and humanistic outcomes
69
what is the purpose of pharmacoeconomic studies?
Guide optimal healthcare resource allocation
70
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
Represent the change in costs & outcomes when 2 treatment alternatives are compared
71
ICR formula
(C2-C1)/(E2-E1)