Chapter 10 Flashcards
(54 cards)
avoidance experiment by Vladimir Bechterev (1913)
subjects placed fingers on metal plate and began without instructions:
warning stimulus (light) signaled shock
subjects quickly learned to lift finger when light turned on (AVOIDANCE)
US exposure depends upon subject’s behavior, an instrumental process, where the ________ is important
response
discriminated avoidance procedure
trials begin with a CS (warning stim)
subject has 2 options:
- respond (R) correctly before US (shock)
- CS is turned off
- US is omitted- this is AVOIDANCE
- fail to respond to CS before US
- CS remains on
- US remains on until R- this is ESCAPE
is escape or avoidance seen early in training?
escape as organism is still learning
goal is to (usually) maintain avoidance
what does the two-process theory of avoidance explain in terms of reinforcement?
how avoidance doesn’t involve getting something and how it can still be reinforcing
two-process theory of avoidance
process 1: classical conditioning
- CS + US in escape trials –> fear of the CS
process 2: instrumental conditioning (depends on process 1)
- response terminates CS (fear) in avoidance trials –> decrease CS by CR
thus, responding is reinforced by a tangible event, FEAR
does learning need to happen in the first process of the two-process theory of avoidance?
NO, they have to learn fear of the CS but that’s it
what part of the brain plays a central role in fear
the amygdala
stimulating the amygdala _______ fear responding (and 3 examples)
increases; freezing, enhanced startle, and heart rate increase
lesioning the amygdala _____ fear responding (and 3 examples)
decreases; approach predators, loss of conditioned fear, and inability to condition fear
acquired drive experiment is an attempt to understand how…
original CS-US experience acquires drive for organism to respond; ultimately CS establishes fear
brown and jacobs 1949 acquired drive experiment
training: shuttle door blocked
- experimental: 22 CS (tone) - US (shock) pairings
- control: CS, no shock
test: shuttle door opened
- CS presented w/o US (40 trials)
results:
- previous training reduced latency to shuttle to the CS alone
- ending a fear-conditioned CS s enough to reinforce avoidance
acquired drive suggests the opposite of ________, as it shows how responding increases after no more US
extinction
______ stimuli can maintain strength overtime (behavioral momentum theory)
aversive
Kamin et al 1963 results
increased suppression in rats avoiding 1-9 consecutive shocks
with more training, suppression decreased (27)
fear decreased with more training independent of avoidance
spot check:
in escape and avoidance, what drives responding?
fear! (of the CS)
what happens when we go below the shock threshold?
this is when we get sloppy/stop paying attention and experience the US again
also know as REINSTATEMENT
strength of avoidance may also ______
fluctuate
can avoidance persist without reintroduction of the aversive event?
yes!
persistence in avoidance
avoidance may continue after US is discontinued, as long as the response turns off the CS+
what is the persistence in avoidance explained by?
conservation of fear
conservation of fear
after learning avoidance, later parts of the CS are protected/maintain fear-provoking behavior from extinction even when US is removed
what is the most effective procedure to confront maladaptive avoidance?
flooding
can avoidance become maladaptive?
yes! examples: anxiety, phobias and commitment issues