Chapter 3: Evidence-Based Nutrition and Practice Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

A proposed explanation for a problem or set of observations.

A

Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The process of formulating explanations about the natural world and testing those explanations with experiments and data.

A

The Scientific Method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A three-pronged approach to working with clients, which consists of making decisions based on the weight of the scientific evidence, field observations, and individual client needs and preferences.

A

Evidence-Based Practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Steps of the Scientific Method

A

1: Identify a problem or set of observations
2: Formulate a hypothesis
3: Design a study to test the hypothesis
4: Collect, synthesize, and interpret data
5: Discard or change hypothesis if data doesn’t support it OR continue testing data that supports the hypothesis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An expected outcome generated from a hypothesis.

A

Prediction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or False: Scientists identify what is most likely to be true by demonstrating what is not true.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A hypothesis or set of hypotheses for which a large body of high-quality evidence has been accumulated.

A

Theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

An account of a person’s experience or event.

A

Anecdote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A variable in an experiment that a scientist makes no effort to manipulate or account for.

A

Uncontrolled Variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Original research where scientists perform experiments and collect data – this is in contrast to secondary research where scientists analyze data that has already been collected or published elsewhere.

A

Primary Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Research in which a researcher observes ongoing behaviors to determine correlation.

A

Observational Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A relationship between two or more variables.

A

Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A type of scientific study/trial where participants are randomly assigned into different groups – one or more will be the intervention to be tested and one will be the control group. Groups are randomized and a control is used in an attempt to reduce potential bias in the trial.

A

Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The variable scientists manipulate in an experiment.

A

Independent Variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The ability to generalize the results of a study.

A

External Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A review where scientists systematically gather all research on a topic and evaluate it based on predefined criteria and rules.

A

Systematic Review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A statistical analysis of a group of studies to assess the overall weight of the evidence. It is an analysis of RCTs.

A

Meta-Analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What 2 reviews represent the highest evidence level because they give the consensus on the best research.

A

Meta-analysis (RCTs) and systematic review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

True or False: A scientific theory is just a guess.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The scientific approach is _______ which means it is based on observation or experience.

21
Q

Case Studies, Surveys, Historical Research

A

3 Types of Descriptive Scientific Research

22
Q

Cross-Sectional Studies, Case-control Studies, Cohort Studies

A

3 Types of Exploratory or Epidemiological Scientific Research

23
Q

• Track a single person or group of people
over time
• Discuss characteristics of or events that
occur to a single person or group
• Primary limitation - may not be
generalizable to larger populations

24
Q
• Questionnaires or interviews administered
 to samples of people
• Primary limitation:
 • They collect self-reported data, and
 can be subject to bias
 • Potential issues with the reliability,
 validity, or how wording of questions
 can influence people’s answers
25
Historical Research
``` • Looks at events that happened in the past and uses it to make inferences about other times, including the future • Limitations: • Information from the past may be incomplete or inaccessible • May be subject to the biases of the researchers involved ```
26
• Variables in a group at a specific point in time • A cross-section of people • Most useful for: • Population-based surveys • To assess the prevalence of diseases in a population • Primary limitation - impossible to assess causal relationships because it’s a one-time “snapshot” measurement
Cross-sectional Studies
27
• Determine if exposure to something is associated with an outcome • Scientists identify people with the outcome and similar people who don’t have the outcome • Uses data that has already been collected or occurred in the past
Case-control Studies
28
Group followed over time to determine association between an exposure and an outcome or disease 1. Cohort free of outcome or disease 2. Researchers identify exposure or event of interest 3. Cohort followed over time until disease or outcome occurs 4. Association between exposure and risk of outcome assessed • Limitations: • Susceptibility to selection bias • Subjects are followed for extended periods of time may withdraw or be lost follow-up • If retrospective: less control over variables, and that subjects may be susceptible to recall bias
Cohort Studies
29
A sample of people under study is not representative of the larger population that scientists are looking to make inferences about.
Selection Bias
30
The critical evaluation of a study by other scientists. This is the highest quality source of scientific info.
Peer Review
31
Which of the following best describes an empirical scientific approach?
Controlled observation
32
Which of the following represents a weakness of observational studies?
Correlation does not equal causation
33
Which of the following best represents a weakness of interventional designs?
Small number of subjects
34
Scientists perform a study looking at the effects of caffeine on vertical jump performance. On one day, they give all the subjects caffeine followed by vertical jump tests. Two weeks later, they give all the subjects a placebo followed by the same vertical jump tests. Which term best describes this study design?
Crossover
35
Which item represents a high quality, non-peer reviewed source of information?
Academic Textbook
36
A scientist hypothesizes that a supplement will increase resistance training performance. A study is carried out, and the results do not support the hypothesis. Multiple studies by independent labs also fail to support the hypothesis. What is the appropriate response regarding the hypothesis?
The predictions have been falsified and the hypothesis is discarded.
37
Which term encompasses the weight of the scientific evidence, field observations, and individual client needs?
Evidence-based practice
38
Scientists randomly assign subjects to a low or high carbohydrate group and then look at changes in body weight over 3 months. Which item represents the independent variable in this study?
Diet type
39
Numerous studies, including genetic studies, randomized controlled trials on lipid lowering medications, and observational studies point to LDL having a causal role in heart disease. Which term best describes the concept that LDL plays a causal role in heart disease?
Theory
40
Scientists take 5000 people and have them fill out questionnaires on their dairy intake. They then compare cancer rates between people with high intakes and low intakes. What type of study is this?
Observational
41
Which of the following represents a strength of observational studies?
Large subject numbers
42
Scientists perform a study comparing 1000 women with breast cancer to 1000 women without breast cancer. They gather information on the women's diets and look to see if the women diagnosed with breast cancer had more fat in their diet compared to the women who did not get cancer. Which term best describes this study?
Case-control study
43
Scientists gather 20 studies looking at the relationship between protein intake and lean body mass, and then they statistically analyze them together as a group. What type of study is this?
Meta-analysis
44
Which term describes a variable in an experiment for which a scientist takes no steps to account for?
Uncontrolled variable
45
Scientists find that a protein supplement increases lean mass in the elderly. However, they caution that the results may not apply to other populations, like younger people. What term best describes what the scientists are referring to?
External validity
46
Scientists perform a study tracking 10,000 people over a 10-year period. They look at their sugar intake at the beginning of the study and then see who develops diabetes over the study duration. Which term best describes this study?
Cohort
47
Which term describes the phenomena when a group does not represent the population a scientist is intending to study?
Selection bias
48
A scientist observes that people tend to perform better in a weight training session after consuming a pre-workout supplement. The scientist proposes that the caffeine in the supplement is increasing arousal, leading to increased performance. Which term best describes this scientist's proposal?
Hypothesis
49
Which observational study design allows scientists to hypothesize a potential causal association?
Cohort study