Chapter 5 Flashcards
(62 cards)
Classical vs. instrumental conditioning
class - learning association between stimuli
instrumental - learning associations b/t stimuli, response and outcome, leads to goal-directed behavior
E. L. Thorndike’s approach for instrumental conditioning
puzzle boxes:
- food restricted cats, goal was to escape box to earn food
- cats learned association between stimulus and response
- the shorter the latency = association being learned
Law of effect
- response to a stimulus followed by a satisfying event strengthened the S-R relationship
ex. pull rope = food and escape –> less time to escape/shorter latency
- responding to a stimulus followed by an annoying event weakened S-R relationship
ex. pull rope in box –> shock –> longer time to escape/longer latency
Discrete trial
response is performed once
behavior of subject terminates trial
timing of trial/initiation of trial is determined by experimenter
discrete trial approach
2 mazes: straight alley and T-maze
measuring: running speed, latency to move from start box (S), choice behavior (only with T-maze)
advantage: control
disadvantage: labor intensive
free operant
subject is “free” to respond at anytime
may be repeated many times, no intervention from experimenter
timing of responses determined by subject/experimenter
free operant approach
skinner box - measures operant response rate: # of lever presses for food
operant response
behavior that “operates” on the environment
free operant advantages
less labor (than discrete)
look at responding across larger periods of time
Magazine training/how to produce a target response: step 1
step 1) magazine training –> get target attention
this is classical conditioning, not operant
sound of magazine (i.e. food dispenser) is a CS+, followed by a food US that orients organism
- goal: organism move towards food to then require an elicited response (aka sign tracking!)
Magazine training/how to produce a target response: step 2
step 2) shaping
this is instrumental/operant conditioning
rewarding successive approximations to target behavior by:
- reinforcing closer actions to the correct response
- not reinforcing early non-target responses
correct steps are preserved, become more stringent as behavior becomes close to target
done when they are able to do it on their own!
3 characteristics of shaping familiar responses
must be a variable response
slowly step-up criteria
can bring about super or miniature responses
Deich, Allan and Zeigler showed that even __________ behaviors, with training, can be modified!
consummatory
2 types of outcomes produced by a response
appetitive stimulus
aversive stimulus
appetitive stimulus
pleasant outcome (getting paid, food, sunshine)
aversive stimulus
negative outcome (yelling, shock, cold)
contingency
something likely to occur because of something else, causal relationship!
2 types: positive and negative
positive contingency
response turns on/causes an outcome
ex. rat can press lever to get food
negative contingency
response turns off/inhibits an outcome
ex. rat can turn off a loud noise by pressing lever (doing something to escape/avoid something)
_______ stimulus + _________ contingency = positive reinforcement
appetitive; positive
______ stimulus + _______ contingency = negative reinforcement
aversive; negative
______ stimulus + _______ contingency = (positive) punishment
aversive; positive
______ stimulus + _______ contingency = omission training/negative punishment
appetitive; negative
positive reinforcement outcome
increase in responding
ex. dog training, good grades