What are two way qualitative data is analysed
Through content and thematic analysis
What is a thematic analysis?
(ana. - qual data. - res. int. data. - comm. them.)
The analysis of qualitative data, where the researcher interprets the data to find common themes
What are themes?
(ids. - app. cons. - set of qual. data)
Ideas that appear consistently in a set of qualitative data
How would researchers conduct a thematic analysis?
What is a strength of thematic analysis?
(prov. +det. und. - ppts. exp - inc. ext. v of stud)
Thematic analyses provide a more detailed understanding of participants’ subjective experience, increasing the external validity of a study.
What is a limitation of thematic analysis?
(lack ext. v, them. + cods. depe. - relev. at time - meth. of ana. - sub. + unrel.)
Thematic analysis lacks external reliability. The themes and codes developed are dependent on what the researcher at the time deems relevant. Therefore this method of analysis can be seen as subjective and unreliable.
What is content analysis?
A method used to analyse qualitative data by turning it into quantitative data
What are the steps to conducting a content analysis?
What is a limitation of content analysis?
(subj. view of rschrs, reli. - red. - avail. qual. data, diary = higher subj. = red. reli. res.)
Content analysis can be subjective to the views of researchers. Reliability of the analysis may be reduced due to the availability of the qualitative data. For example, using a diary entry may cause higher subjectivity, reducing the reliability of the results.
(allw. res. - use stats. - test hyp. - draw. clr. conc. - qual. data, obj. > them. ana. - more reli.)
Content analysis allows researchers to use statistics to test hypotheses so they can draw clearer conclusions about qualitative data. They tend to be more objective than thematic analyses, and therefore more reliable too
Compare and contrast thematic and content analysis
What are the two methods used to test the reliability of content analyses?
Test - retest reliability or inter - rater reliability
What is test - retest reliability?
(run - con. ana - aga. - same samp. - comp. res, sim. res. = gd test - retest reliability)
Running the content analysis again on the same sample, them comparing results
Similar results indicate the research has good test - retest reliability
What is inter - rater reliability?
(second res. - cont. ana. w/ same cod. uni. + data - findings comp, sim. = gd int. rater. reli.)
A second researcher runs the content analysis with the same coding categories and data and the findings are compared
If there is similarity then there is good inter - rater reliability