Flashcards in CTT Deck (52):
The raw inputs. 1s and 0s. Raw signals.
The data in a usable form. 1s and 0s in a spreadsheet with columns and rows.
Information that has been interpreted with a focus on the significance of the information.
What are the phases of the intelligence cycle?
Planning and Direction
Processing and Exploitation
Describe Planning and Direction
In this phase the mission and commander's intent is provided.
in this phase what you need to know to produce the commanders uncertainty regarding the mission is identified and codified into INR's and PIR's a collection plan is formulated an executed. What is collected is the raw data.
Processing and Exploitation
in this phase collect data is processed and converted into a usable form i.e. intelligence
in this phase of the Intel cycle information is converted into intelligence. The significance of the information in light of the mission is determined and Darius intelligence products are produced in order to convey that finished intelligence to consumers
in this phase finished intelligence products are disseminated to consumers.
in this phase intelligence products are utilized in support of contacting operations. This yours Asian will produce feedback feedback into the first phase of the Intel cycle as the cycle repeats for new missions on the faces of planning for missions.
describe intelligence support to planning
intelligence is one of the six war fighting functions. According to JP two Dash oh the most important role of intelligence and military operations is to provide commanders and their stops with analysis of key aspects of the OE to assist them in their decision-making process.
describe the four steps of IPB
step one defined the operational environment step to describe the effects on operations step three evaluate the adversary step for Steve Herman adversary coeds
what is step four of IPB
determine adversary COA
define creative thinking
thinking creatively mean fuming problems or questions in a novel unusual or untypical Waze involves looking at things from different perspectives seeing in ways that are not bound by custom norms or habit
describe the profile of a creative thinker
curious, enjoys challenges, constructive discontent, optimistic, imaginative, courageous, I'm afraid to fail, humble
describe the five barriers to creative thinking
paradigms, so of restriction, single solution, expected solution, functional fixation
describe the process of issue development
technique for solving a problem and I step-by-step way. Topics are too broad issues or more specific issues provide research guidance
describe the methods of defeating self-limiting perspectives
ping-pong ball, deep diving into why, squeezing the issue
describe structured brainstorming
A systematic process which encourages contributors to actively participate by contributing ideas in a non-critical or non-evaluate environment
describe the blockbusting and slice and dice methods of overcoming initial perceptions
blockbusting come up with as many uses for idea or item, come up with as many improvements or idea or item, come up with as many what if possibilities for ID our item
slice and dice it's worth explicit dissection of an issue to find all of the aspects and attributes of it slicing and been examining the parts and their relation to the whole dicing
describe six hats
The idea that the group will put on one at a time and come up with as many ideas as possible
describe the divergent thinking method random analogy
simply pick a random object and ask how is this problem like this object.
describe the divergent thinking method mind mapping
mind maps take the whole of an idea and arrange a series of related subcomponents around if I can be further broken down
describe divergent thinking about that alternative features
involves establishing the main question or problem and then brainstorming about forces and factors affecting the issue also involves building for future scenarios based on various extreme of drivers, priced from forces
describe divergent thinking method key assumptions check
A systematic effort to make explicit him question the working assumptions that Guide and analyst interpretation of evidence and reasoning about a particular problem
describe critical thinking
an unnatural skilled that anyone can learn but requires practice good critical thinking skills given all of us the ability to think more clearly and see things were the way they are
describe the analytical process
analyze – all about gathering bits of information and determining their significance
synthesize – concerned with the pieces of information in the synthesize step you pick the pieces together discerning Patters etc.
exclamation Dash make predictions about the likelihood of future possibilities the goal is not to definitively predict the future but to reduce uncertainty about it
describe blooms Texon to me
remember – ability to recall facts understand – ability to interpret information apply Dash make use of knowledge in particular situations in life – breaking information into parts discerning how parts really; grasping the whole evaluate – Xsport and vend judgments create – combining information in a new way, producing products
describe the profile of a critical thinker
logical humble observant well read appreciate the perspective withhold judgment focused tests assumptions courageous independent articulate
able to face and comfortable trip; able to speak truth to power; moral intellectual courage
describe social by us
refers to biases based on their cultural or ethnic this differences of all kinds
describe best case buyers
results in an implicit in unconscious desire to pick the best day somethings ignoring that which is contradictory and or unpleasant this can also be understood as excessive optimism
describe worst case by us
common among intelligence analysts were prone to select the most dangerous adversary course of action as being the most likely one
describe the business of bias
A larger volume of information or most recent reporting tends to earn a disproportionate amount of validity and her weight in the analysts mind
describe excessive secrecy bias
information that cannot be shared and therefore cannot form the basis for a critical argument vague references to such information and or sources there before become advocacy not argument
describe mirror imaging bias
One lacks a good picture of what the adversary is like or is likely to do so one substantiates one's own judgment in place of the adversaries
describe unitary action by us
when we think of our adversary is always working in perfect harmony
describe proportionality buyers
tendency to believe that causes are proportional to affects in magnitude. 16 events with momentous consequences have extreme momentous causes. Mundane affects have Munding causes
distinguish between argument and assertion. Argument
what plus Y. Premises plus conclusion
distinguish between an argument and an assertion. I station
what without Wi-Fi. Conclusion without premises
describe a statement
The building blocks of arguments they are what arguments consist of. Questions commands and expressions of emotion or not statements
premise. Why are you saying something the reason to believe that the conclusion is true
what are you supposed to conclude after examining the premises
True premises guarantee a conclusion – they make it certain; not asking if the premises are true; if the premises were true with that guarantee a true conclusion
an argument and sound if it is valid and all promises are true
describe the process of analyzing arguments using logic
identify the conclusion – what are they saying identify the premises – why are they saying determine the D – is the argument presented in a ballot form? Do you true promises grantee a true conclusion? Determine soundness – are the premises and therefore the conclusions true?
identify the circular reasoning policy
uses a conclusion as promised to prove a similarly praise conclusion; also known as begging the
describe the red herring fallacy
distracts from the argument with something a relevant but attractive;
described the strawman fallacy
changes the meaning of the opposing argument into something that is easier to knock down; the argument to feed it is not the argument Amira rigidly made
describe the ad hominem fallacy
personal attack to discredit the person making an argument attacks character qualifications consistency; does not engage in the argument itself
describe the hasty generalization fallacy
rushing to judgment about the whole based on a very small sample relying too heavily on antidotal evidence or experience