Dose response curves. Affinity and efficacy. Flashcards
What are examples of functional responses that can be measured in vivo ?
- Change in heart rate
- Change in blood pressure
- Hormone secretion – e.g. Insulin
- Nerve AP frequency
What are examples of functional responses that can be measured in vitro ?
Isolated tissues: - Smooth muscle contraction - Brain slice transmitter release - Nerve compound action potential Single cells: - Membrane potential change - Membrane ion channel current [cAMP], [Ca2+], [cGMP], [H+] Multicellular assays: - Cell proliferation - Reporter gene product
What is a dose-response curve ?
A plot of the % MAX response against log [drug]
What is the relationship between [drug] and receptor occupancy ?
A + R –> AR
What law in particular applies to the reaction between drug and receptor ?
The Law of Mass Action applies to this reaction :
“The rate of a reaction is proportional to the product of the concentrations of the reactants.”
In a drug-receptor reaction, in what state will the system be ?
The system is at equilibrium.
“The rates of the forward and backward reactions will be equal.” –> k+1 [A][R] = k-1 [AR]
How are receptor proportions defined in pharmacology ?
Proportion of receptor in R state : pR = [R]/[R]T
Proportion of receptors occupied : pAR = [AR]/[R]T
At equilibrium : k+1 [A][R]/[R]T = k-1 [AR]/[R]T
<=> k+1 [A]pR = k-1 pAR <=> [A{pR = KapAR
<=> pR= (KA/[A]) pAR
Define d=the dissociation equilibrium constant.
Ka = k-1 / k+1
Given that pR+pAR = 1 and Ka/[A] pAR + pAR = 1, sttae the Hill-Langmuir equation.
What happens when Ka = [A] ? - when [A]»_space; Ka ?
pAR = [A] / (Ka + [A])
When [A] =Ka, pAR = 0.5
When [A]»_space; Ka, pAR ~ 1
What assumptions di AJ Clark and AC Hill make while establishing the relationship between receptor occupancy and response ?
– Law of mass action applies to the drug-receptor reaction
– The drug-receptor reaction is at equilibrium
– Response of the tissue is linearly related to receptor occupancy response = constant x occupancy
Clark tentatively considered whether the response might be directly proportional to occupancy (constant =1) although it was clear he knew this to be unlikely.
How do we refer to the agonist concentration giving half maximal response (y = 50%) ?
[A]50
What is the Hill plot ?
What crucial oversimplification is made in here ?
log(y/(100-y)) = log[A] - log{a}50
No distinction is made here between occupied and activated receptors: it is assumed all occupied receptors are active.
What is the difference between a full agonist and a partial agonist ?
full agonists : elicit a maximal tissue response
partial agonists : cannot elicit this maximal response
The difference has to do with the efficacy of the agonist (and not the potency/affinity).
Give examples of full and partial agonists.
Include the receptors at which they act.
beta-AR : - PA = prenalterol, terbutaline - FA = AD, isoprenaline Musc receptors : - PA = pilocarpine - FA = ACh Histamine H2 receptors : - PA = impromidine - FA = histamine
Why does the maximal response of the partial agonist, and the [A]50 of both full and partial agonist depend on the tissue ?
The answer lies in the density of receptors in each tissue, and the ability of the agonist to activate the receptor – the agonist efficacy.