Ethics- Situaion Ethics Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

what theory did robinson develop

A

‘man come of age’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

man come of age

A

-view that man is mature and developed enough to make ethical decisions for himself, take responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did robinson think of legalistic approach

A

-legalistic approach of divine command ethics no longer necessary, misconception of ethics Jesus taught

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did robinson argue we need to follow instead of strict moral laws

A

-individuals should act in a way which best demonstrate love to others, the love Jesus meant ‘love thy neighbour’
-this is agape love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

agapeistic love

A

-show to everyone whether you like them or not
-right attitude
-expect nothing in return
-different from other kinds of love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why is this ethicsl theory teleological?

A

-concerned eith outcome of action
-good action vary situation, relativist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lewis four loves

A

-storge- affection
-philia- friendship
-eros- sexual
-agape- charity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

examples where Jesus rejects legalistic deontological approach to ethics

A

-‘sabbath was made for man not man for the sabbath’
-Jesus heals leperosy instead of following religious teaching they’re unclean sinners
-saved woman from being stoned ‘whoever hasn’t sinned should throw the first stone’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Robinson divorce

A

-rejected traditional Christian teaching that divorce immoral in eyes of God as supernatural bond
-if agape better shown through divorce, other beliefs should be set aside

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fletcher situationalism

A

-not antinomianism because people have moral constraints
-not legalism as maxims can be abandoned if agape love better shown another way
-middle group between two moral extremes, antinomianism and legalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Antinomianism

A

-moral extreme
-view no moral laws or rules
-people should act spontaneously in each situation, decide what is right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Legalism

A

-view morality should be based on laws that much always be followed
-absolutist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fletcher four presuppositions

A

Pragmatism
Relativism
Positivism
Personalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pragmatism

A

-more demands should be practical, achieve intend outcome love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Relativism

A

-situations should be assess how best demonstrate love, not absolutist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Positivism

A

-moral values based on faith rather than reason
-moral agent has to decide through faith in God that love most important thing

17
Q

Personalism

A

-demands needs and importance people considered first, not demands moral laws

18
Q

Positivism

A

-moral values not proven by logic or reason by based on faith
-moral agent has to decide through their faith in God that love is the most important thing of all

19
Q

Personalism

A

-demands that the needs and importance of people considered first, not demands of moral laws

20
Q

what do the 6 fundamental principles exaplain

A

-how agape should be understood and applied in ethical situations

21
Q

6 fundamental principles (IDJNES)

A

-Only love is intrinsically good
-Ruling norm Christian descision is love
-Justice is love distributed
-Love wills the neighbours good whether we like him or not
-The end justifies the means
-Loves acted out situationally not prescriptively

22
Q

Fletcher extreme situations

A

-woman kills crying baby to protect group people being attacked
-woman committed adultery russian camp guard so she would become pregnant and able return to family
-doctor allow abortion for patient in mental hospital who been raped

23
Q

(Weakness- Christian responses)
Who banned situation ethics being taught in places of catholic teaching? what year?

A

-Sacred Congregation of holy office in 1956

24
Q

(Weakness- Christian responses)
Why did the holy segregation ban situation ethics being taught

A

-argued that although conscience could be used interpret what God wanted mankind, situation treat conscience as source of moral knowledge rather than natural moral law which provides absolute laws from God to follow

25
Vardy criticisms
-provides lack of clear guidance, almost any action could be allowed, people could claim they acted situationally when their intentions may have been bad
26
Vardy criticism quote
-open to abuse as it is ‘used to justify doing what people feel inclined to do, rather than what may be right’
27
Difficulty with situation ethics
-as most consequentialist ethics, hard to predict consequence of one’s actions -even if try demonstrate agape, may not be result, unpredictable
28
Barclay criticisms
-ethics meant to make life easy, give us rules and laws which we accept and apply, saves us from difficult task managing own judgements -situation ethics does not do this, ‘man come of age’ gives a ‘terrifying degree of freedom’ -we are not ready for this freedom as we are not perfect, make mistakes, need rules guide us
29
Barclay critisicm Fletchers extreme situations
-unusual, extreme situations, unlikely someone will encounter moral situation this severity, so should not be used to justify everyday morality
30
Strengths (DRFJC)
-most agree agape desirable attitude to have towards others -gives ‘man come of age’ responsibility -provides flexibility -consistent with jesus teaching and rejection of legalism, suitable christian’s -responded to social and moral change at time, provide realistic christian alternative to rejected christian legalistic ethic