what theory did robinson develop
‘man come of age’
man come of age
-view that man is mature and developed enough to make ethical decisions for himself, take responsibility
what did robinson think of legalistic approach
-legalistic approach of divine command ethics no longer necessary, misconception of ethics Jesus taught
what did robinson argue we need to follow instead of strict moral laws
-individuals should act in a way which best demonstrate love to others, the love Jesus meant ‘love thy neighbour’
-this is agape love
agapeistic love
-show to everyone whether you like them or not
-right attitude
-expect nothing in return
-different from other kinds of love
why is this ethicsl theory teleological?
-concerned eith outcome of action
-good action vary situation, relativist
Lewis four loves
-storge- affection
-philia- friendship
-eros- sexual
-agape- charity
examples where Jesus rejects legalistic deontological approach to ethics
-‘sabbath was made for man not man for the sabbath’
-Jesus heals leperosy instead of following religious teaching they’re unclean sinners
-saved woman from being stoned ‘whoever hasn’t sinned should throw the first stone’
Robinson divorce
-rejected traditional Christian teaching that divorce immoral in eyes of God as supernatural bond
-if agape better shown through divorce, other beliefs should be set aside
Fletcher situationalism
-not antinomianism because people have moral constraints
-not legalism as maxims can be abandoned if agape love better shown another way
-middle group between two moral extremes, antinomianism and legalism
Antinomianism
-moral extreme
-view no moral laws or rules
-people should act spontaneously in each situation, decide what is right
Legalism
-view morality should be based on laws that much always be followed
-absolutist
Fletcher four presuppositions
Pragmatism
Relativism
Positivism
Personalism
Pragmatism
-more demands should be practical, achieve intend outcome love
Relativism
-situations should be assess how best demonstrate love, not absolutist
Positivism
-moral values based on faith rather than reason
-moral agent has to decide through faith in God that love most important thing
Personalism
-demands needs and importance people considered first, not demands moral laws
Positivism
-moral values not proven by logic or reason by based on faith
-moral agent has to decide through their faith in God that love is the most important thing of all
Personalism
-demands that the needs and importance of people considered first, not demands of moral laws
what do the 6 fundamental principles exaplain
-how agape should be understood and applied in ethical situations
6 fundamental principles (IDJNES)
-Only love is intrinsically good
-Ruling norm Christian descision is love
-Justice is love distributed
-Love wills the neighbours good whether we like him or not
-The end justifies the means
-Loves acted out situationally not prescriptively
Fletcher extreme situations
-woman kills crying baby to protect group people being attacked
-woman committed adultery russian camp guard so she would become pregnant and able return to family
-doctor allow abortion for patient in mental hospital who been raped
(Weakness- Christian responses)
Who banned situation ethics being taught in places of catholic teaching? what year?
-Sacred Congregation of holy office in 1956
(Weakness- Christian responses)
Why did the holy segregation ban situation ethics being taught
-argued that although conscience could be used interpret what God wanted mankind, situation treat conscience as source of moral knowledge rather than natural moral law which provides absolute laws from God to follow