Final Remaining Flashcards

1
Q

Utilization behavior

A

exaggerated tendency for one’s behavior to be determined by the external environment

behavior automatically determined by salient stimuli in environment

damage to IFG (Inferior Frontal Gyrus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Imitation Behavior

A

Copying environmental stimuli

Utilization behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Environmental Dependency Syndrome

A

Behaviors determined by environment as opposed to willful action

Damage to IFG (Inferior Frontal Gyrus)

Damage to Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inferior Frontal Gyrus

A

damage to IFG demonstrate utilization behavior

will spontaneously mimic actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

A

Brenda Milner identified dPFC role in cognitive control through Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST)

perseverative error: error of inhibition
patient “can’t stop himself”
could verbalize proper response but couldn’t could not modify skeletomotor responses accordingly
recruit epilepsy patients pre/post unilateral cortical incision

perseverative error: error of inhibition
patient “can’t stop himself”
could verbalize proper response but couldn’t could not modify skeletomotor responses accordingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pavlovian Threat Conditioning

A

Classical conditioning
US, CS + NS pairing, CS alone elicits CR,

Amygdala plays role in learning fear response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Le Doux

A

Threat processing circuit

Lateral Nucleus = association formation
Central Nucleus = downstream response

plasticity in lateral nucleus is what allows it to encode and store the associations between the CS and US

Amygdala = structure = consists of several nuclei

The sensory information from the CS (all stimuli) goes to thalamus —> sent to lateral nucleus (labeled input nucleus of amygdala bc takes in all stimuli CS + US) —plasticity in lateral nucleus is what allows it to encode and store the associations between the CS and US; in this nucleus the association is being formed; if you lesion the LN only you will prevent fear conditioning —> associations then get transferred to central nucleus “referred to as output nucleus” bc takes info from LN and sends downstream to parts of brain responsible for fear response; you’re not preventing the association from being formed, you’re preventing the information from going downstream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Extinction

A

Originally thought to involve “unlearning” of the CS-US association; but evidence suggests original pathway remains intact; extinction learning–CS is actually associated with something neutral; active form of learning

EXTINCTION LEARNING IS AN IMPLICIT FORM OF EMOTION REGULATION

Current understanding of extinction posits that it involves new learning of a CS-No US association

COMPETES WITH PREVIOUSLY LEARNED CS-US ASSOCIATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reinstatement

A

Exposure to US -> Reinstatement

Reemergence of CR –> Original association between CS and US must remain intact following extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Renewal

A

Presentation of CS in new context -> Renewal

Reemergence of CR –> Original association between CS and US must remain intact following extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Spontaneous Recovery

A

Passage of time -> Spontaneous Recovery

Reemergence of CR –> Original association between CS and US must remain intact following extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Prelimbic Cortex

A

PL
in rats
crucial in fear expression
homologous to dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex

A

dACC
in humans
crucial for fear expression
homologous to prelimbic cortex in rats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Infralimbic

A

IL
in rats
crucial in extinction
homologous to ventralmedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex

A

vmPFC
in humans
crucial for extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Homologous structures in rodents and humans in fear conditioning and extinction

A
prelimbic cortex (rats) = dACC dorsal anterior cingulate c
==> promote fear expression, oppose extinction 
infralimbic cortex (rats) = vmPFC ventromedial prefrontal c
==> inhibit fear expression, promote extinction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Quirk rodent experiment

A

lesioned IL in rodents (homologous to vmPFC in humans)

does not interfere with extinction on day 1
interferes with retrieval

on same day, you don’t see huge change; prominent differences show up on day 2; it’s as if they never learned extinction, only retained threat learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Implications for extinction process

A

Functions as a memory…contains three steps

  1. acquisition
  2. consolidation
  3. retrieval

***retrieval of extinction memory impaired on day 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Process Model of Emotional Regulation

A

Outline of the process of experiencing emotion according to appraisal theories

start with a situation that could elicit emotion if you attend to the aspects of the environment —> once you attend to something, it depends on the meaning/appraisal so place on something, that determines your emotion generation

What enables us to change the meaning that emotional stimuli have to us?

  1. situation selection
  2. situation modification
  3. attentional deployment
  4. cognitive change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Cognitive Reappraisal

A

down-regulating negative emotion

meta-analysis task –> bc volitional action, lateral regions more involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Circadian Timing

A
  • Operates over the 24 h light-dark cycle
  • Drives metabolic and behavioral rhythms
      • sleep
      • wakefulness
      • appetite
      • metabolic and reproductive fitness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Millisecond Timing

A

Subsecond range

used for speech, music, motor control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Interval Timing

A

Seconds-to-minutes range

used for anticipating future events, organizing behavior, decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Verbal Time Estimation Task

A

(Participants verbally estimate duration of the square on screen)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Temporal Reproduction Task
Reproduce the duration themselves Participants are required to press the spacebar once to initiate their time estimates and then press once again when they think that the presentation duration of the former square (e.g., 3 s) has elapsed
26
Duration Discrimination Task
2+ stimuli presented | subject may be asked to make a judgment as to whether the longer interval was the first or second
27
Behavioral Properties of Timing Ability
Accuracy - close to actual Precision - close to each other
28
Accuracy
On average, we are highly accurate in our temporal judgments Linear relationship between target durations and time estimates Close to actual
29
Precision
Error in time estimates grow proportional to the timed interval Trial-to-trial variability is constant within an individual close to each other
30
Scalar Property of Timing
scalar time: errors vary linearly with estimated durations Scalar property/Weber's law: one of the hallmark signatures of interval timing that describes the linear relationship between target durations and the standard deviation of duration judgments, indicating that variability in timing behavior grows proportional to the mean of the interval being estimated. In this sense, duration discrimination is relative rather than absolute, that is time perception is like a rubber band in that it can be stretched to produce time-scale invariance across different durations
31
Factors Affecting Subjective Time Judgements
1. Affective state - emotion-induced activation temporarily increases the speed of an internal clock (thereby leading to longer perceived durations) 2. Age: older vs. younger adults (time passes more quickly for older adult) 3. Health status: psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression, schizophrenia) and neurodegenerative conditions (e.g., Parkinson’s disease) 4. Stimulus properties and context - Cognitive load (e.g., increasing the number of timed intervals) accuracy of time estimation deteriorated with cognitive load; overestimation of time - Dynamic vs. static stimuli
32
Neural and Physiological Substrates of Timing
Distributed neural network involved in forming and updating temporal expectations dlPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) anterior insula vPM (ventral premotor area) ACC (anterior cingulate cortex)
33
Cortico-striatal-cerebellar Circuit
?
34
Striatal Subpopulations
Striatal subpopulation dynamics predict duration judgments - Trained rats to estimate and categorize the duration of time intervals as longer or shorter than 1.5 seconds - When rats mistook shorter interval for a long one, population activity had traveled farther down path than would normally (and vice-versa) - Suggests that variability in subjective estimates of the passage of time might arise from variability in the speed of striatal neuron’s changing patterns of activity - Lesioning striatum impaired rat’s ability to classify interval durations altogether - striatal ensembles drive subjects’ judgments of duration, Individual neurons show significant short and long preferences ===> Striatal subpopulation dynamics predict duration judgments ___________ The striatum encodes reinforcement learning and procedural motion, and consequently is required to represent temporal information precisely, which then guides actions in proper sequence. dorso-medial striatal neurons = time-relevant neurons dlPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex)
35
Time Cells in Hippocampus
Hippocampal neurons that fire at successive moments in temporally structured experiences different striatal neurons are active at different time points Hippocampal time cells fire at successive moments in temporally structured experiences.
36
Pupillary Indices of Temporal Expectation
Temporal expectations in the autonomous nervous system (ANS) Human pupil size Temporal prediction - Letter discrimination task - Delays to visual target presentations were manipulated Pupillary response tracks temporal information - Dilatory pupillary activity started earlier when the targets were expected to appear sooner after trial onset - Time-based information processing in the ANS
37
Neural correlates of timing ability
No dedicated region associated with timing ``` Basal ganglia (BG) as the locus for the representation of temporal information - Striatum, a main input area of the BG, has been implicated for timing supra-second intervals ```
38
Supra-second and sub-second intervals
Sub-second intervals are mainly processed by automatic timing, which does not require attentional modulation, whereas supra-second durations are under the control of higher cognitive functions such as attention and working memory
39
Mouse Duration Discrimination Task
time as encoded by striatal populations ran faster or slower when rats judged a duration as longer or shorter, respectively. These results demonstrate that the speed with which striatal population state changes supports the fundamental ability of animals to judge the passage of time
40
Mouse Duration Discrimination Task
time as encoded by striatal populations ran faster or slower when rats judged a duration as longer or shorter, respectively. These results demonstrate that the speed with which striatal population state changes supports the fundamental ability of animals to judge the passage of time - Trained rats to estimate and categorize the duration of time intervals as longer or shorter than 1.5 seconds - When rats mistook shorter interval for a long one, population activity had traveled farther down path than would normally (and vice-versa) - Suggests that variability in subjective estimates of the passage of time might arise from variability in the speed of striatal neuron’s changing patterns of activity - Lesioning striatum impaired rat’s ability to classify interval durations altogether - striatal ensembles drive subjects’ judgments of duration - Individual neurons show significant short and long preferences !!! - Different striatal neurons are active at different time points
41
Mouse Duration Discrimination Task
time as encoded by striatal populations ran faster or slower when rats judged a duration as longer or shorter, respectively. These results demonstrate that the speed with which striatal population state changes supports the fundamental ability of animals to judge the passage of time - Trained rats to estimate and categorize the duration of time intervals as longer or shorter than 1.5 seconds - When rats mistook shorter interval for a long one, population activity had traveled farther down path than would normally (and vice-versa) - Suggests that variability in subjective estimates of the passage of time might arise from variability in the speed of striatal neuron’s changing patterns of activity - Lesioning striatum impaired rat’s ability to classify interval durations altogether - striatal ensembles drive subjects’ judgments of duration - Individual neurons show significant short and long preferences !!! - Different striatal neurons are active at different time points
42
fMRI Timing Test
- Estimation of the time-of-arrival of a pendulum - Make a key press when the pendulum reaches its maximum height - Manipulation: Induce unpredictable changes in speed of the pendulum’s swing from one semi-period to the next Periodic –predictable Non-periodic -unpredictable - More extensive activation in non-periodic test trials - Distributed neural network involved in forming and updating temporal expectations dlPFC (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) anterior insula vPM (ventral premotor area) ACC (anterior cingulate cortex)
43
Gouvea Rat Timing
- Trained rats to estimate and categorize the duration of time intervals as longer or shorter than 1.5 seconds - When rats mistook shorter interval for a long one, population activity had traveled farther down path than would normally (and vice-versa) - Suggests that variability in subjective estimates of the passage of time might arise from variability in the speed of striatal neuron’s changing patterns of activity - Lesioning striatum impaired rat’s ability to classify interval durations altogether - striatal ensembles drive subjects’ judgments of duration, Individual neurons show significant short and long preferences ===> Striatal subpopulation dynamics predict duration judgments
44
Neural correlates of timing
- There is no dedicated brain region that is associated with the timing function - Distributed neural network subserving temporal cognition There is no dedicated time-keeping mechanism in the brain The involvement of very large and distributed neural networks CNS + ANS (pupillary dilation)
45
Coma
state of unarousable consciousness failure of ‘ascending reticular system looks like someone is alseep but can't wake them up; can't respond to external stimuli
46
Vegetative State
state of arousal after coming out of coma brain/physiological system is a little bit more 'awake' but no meaningful interaction also referred to as Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome Vegetative state: reticular activating system is INTACT; fiber tracts are intact; conclusion is that reticular activating system is necessary for consciousness but not sufficient for consciousness
47
Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome
aka vegetative state state of arousal after coming out of coma brain/physiological system is a little bit more 'awake' but no meaningful interaction
48
Minimally Conscious State
half the time in vegetative, half the time responsive (conscious)
49
Locked-In Syndrome
you are conscious, but cannot respond to external stimuli Implication: patient is aware and intentional
50
REM Sleep
Rapid eye movement sleep Reticulate system is active during REM More of a conscious state The body's internal function is more active during REM sleep. Heart rate is faster and more irregular, blood pressure rises and breathing is quicker and more irregular Dreams occur here
51
Non-REM Sleep
Unaware and unconscious Brain waves are typically slow and of high voltage, the breathing and heart rate are slow and regular, the blood pressure is low, and the sleeper is relatively still
52
Recovery of Consciousness
Recovery of conscious awareness and cognitive function following severe brain injuries can occur over surprisingly long time intervals of months, years and rarely decade
53
Awareness
What determines the contents of our conscious awareness at any given moment? ==ATTENTION Knowledge or perception of a situation or fact
54
Change Blindness
Not consciously aware of the change
55
Visual Masking
If you put a visual white noise screen being presented, if it's close enough in time you won't have conscious experience of seeing the word the mask is inhibiting your ability to notice the stimulus; has to be close in time implicit memory for the word -- repetition suppression: recall "note" faster if seen it before, even if don't consciously remember seeing it The fusiform gyrus= part of the temporal lobe and occipital lobe drastically reduced during subliminal messaging
56
V1 test
Neuronal Correlates of Perception in Early Visual Cortex Looking in V1 —> presented noise structures, some with grating in it, difficult to identify whether or not grating was present Hit = yes grating, should activate V1 neurons (O) + conscious of that grating (S) Correct Rejection = no grating, no V1 neuron activation (O) + no conscious recall (S) Miss = yes grating, V1 neuron activation (O) + no conscious recall (S) False Alarm = no grating, no V1 neuron activation (O) + conscious recall (S) BOLD Activation --> much more activation in hits than in misses; V1 not telling you just what is in environment; hits and misses should be same if objective; false alarms led to almost same level of activity as hits V1 activity modulated by conscious experience --> all about your interpretation of experience
57
Locked-In Owen experiment
Spoken speech —> temporal lobe (speech) Ambiguous speech —> additional activation in frontal, indicating semantic processing [creek, beam, ceiling] Imagine playing tennis —> motor cortex Imagine walking through childhood home —> PPA, parietal (navigation) Hearing what is being said and consciously responding to it
58
Attentional Blink
Attentional Blink Experiment Presented with serial visual presentation 1. Identify the white stimulus? 2. Was there an x? Percent correct as function in relation to relative serial position Performance drops right after onset of T1, then returns to normative levels —> A tiny temporal window after onset of target 1 in which you are unable to identify the second stimulus Application: 100-400 after surprise
59
Parietal Cortex | R-Damage, L-Damage
Damage to R parietal lobe, neglect to left visual field -- doesn't make it into awareness, not conscious of left side of space -- no reporting of conscious awareness Right P cortex is typically damaged in cases of visual neglect L parietal cortex is not important in consciousness of external world, but instead in internal consciousness; lack of self-awareness? Right damage - hemispheric neglect Left damage - lack of self-awareness?
60
Massimini Cortical Connectivity Study
Break down of Cortical Effective Connectivity How the brain is physiologically different during awake and during non-REM sleep Stimulating TMS over part of brain —> how brain reacts to stimulation During wakefulness, you get activity in site of activation that then moves bilaterally to nearby areas [doesn’t stay localized in one area] ability of activation in one brain area to activate other regions is much greater during wakefulness than when sleeping In non-REM sleep, same robust activation in stimulation site but doesn’t travel in brain (the brain is inhibited from cross-regional connectivity) —> local activity might be intact, but consciousness requires the areas to communicate with each other LOCALIZED ACTIVITY IN SLEEP/UNCONSCIOUS vs. WIDESPREAD ACTIVITY WHEN AWAKE/CONSCIOUS
61
Neural Correlates of Consciousness
Global metabolism is not diagnostic about consciousness The overall level of activity of a brain area doesn’t seem to be indicative of level of consciousness, except with reticular formation system (needed but still not enough) Effective connectivity may be a more sensitive measure —> how distributed and long-range information is being integrated
62
Gorilla Video Implications
Too much environmental stimuli for us to process Selecting from the over 2 million bits of auditory and visual stimuli that you can process at any given moment Attention gives you spotlight to the world
63
Gorilla Video Implications
Too much environmental stimuli for us to process Selecting from the over 2 million bits of auditory and visual stimuli that you can process at any given moment Attention gives you spotlight to the world
64
Tong Paper
Both stimuli present in both situations (both faces and places) Consciously aware of only one at a time When aware of face, increased FFA activation; when aware of house, PPA activation
65
Evidence for Extinction Learning
Exposure to US -> Reinstatement Presentation of CS in new context -> Renewal Passage of time -> Spontaneous Recovery
66
Brenda Milner
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Wisconsin Card Sorting Task Perservative Error = error of inhibition
67
Brenda Milner Error
Perservative error = error of inhbitiion