genetics 3 Flashcards
(352 cards)
Multifactorial Inheritance
Multifactorial inheritance is indicated when there is an increased risk to relatives, but there is no consistent pattern of inheritance within families. In this case, it is reasonable to assume multiple genes and environmental factors contribute to disease susceptibility. The genes that contribute to multifactorial disease susceptibility may or may not include the genes that cause the disease in patients showing Mendelian inheritance. To add to the complexity, the same disease may be the outcome of different multifactorial pathways.
Simple Mendelian
diseases are generally single-gene disorders characterized by inheritance patterns that follow Mendelian expectations and are discernable by examining pedigrees with multiple affected individuals. Reality is that many “simple Mendelian” diseases have characteristics not explained by the genotype at the causative locus. variable disease progression depending on other factors common. different alleles in same gene associated with varying levels of severity
Complex Traits
While inheritance of the disease may indeed follow such Mendelian patterns, it is often the case that the manifestation of the disease shows great variability among those with the same genetic risk factor(s). This variability in disease manifestation is likely due to many of the same characteristics that define complex traits. Aggregate (cluster) in families, Do not follow simple Mendelian mode of inheritance, Likely due to variants in multiple genes and non-genetic factors that may interact, No simple relationship between genetic variant and trait when looking at the population. Need to distinguish between clustering in families due to genetic factors and those due to shared environmental factors. Each measure of genetic contribution needs to be interpreted carefully, but as a group can provide compelling evidence for genetic contribution to trait.
Determining the Relative Contribution of Genetic and Environmental Variation
There are several epidemiological study designs that have been used to try to estimate the degree to which genetic variation is responsible for variation in who gets a particular disease or in a quantitative trait such as blood pressure. Need to distinguish between clustering in families due to genetic factors and those due to shared environmental factors. Twin, adoption, and immigration studies used. Each measure of genetic contribution needs to be interpreted carefully, but as a group can provide compelling evidence for genetic contribution to trait.
problem with family studies
One problem in family studies is that individuals who are genetically related often share a similar culture and environment.
Twin studies
provide a potential means of overcoming this problem. Monozygous (MZ) twins are identically matched for DNA sequence, age, and gender, and perhaps closely matched for environmental exposures. Dizygous (DZ) twins on average share 1/2 of their DNA sequences, but may be about as closely matched for other factors as are MZ twins. If it can be assumed that MZ and DZ twins are equally similar with respect to non-inherited factors, then twins can be used to get an estimate of the relative contribution of genetic vs. environmental variation to the trait. A much higher correlation among MZ compared to DZ twins for a quantitative trait suggests that genetic variation is relatively more important than variation in non-genetic factors. If twins raised together and assume same degree of similar environment then differences in concordance rate between mono- and dizygotic twins likely due to genetic factors.
Adoption Studies
Compare similarity between biological siblings raised apart and adoptive siblings. If biological sib 2 more concordant with biological sibling than adopted sibling, then have evidence for genetic component as opposed to environmental component.
Concordance rates
the presence of the same trait in both members of a pair of twins. However, the strict definition is the probability that a pair of individuals will both have a certain characteristic, given that one of the pair has the characteristic. For example, twins are concordant when both have or both lack a given trait. The ideal example of concordance is that of identical twins. Concordance rates are often used to compare MZ and DZ twins. A much higher concordance rate for disease in MZ than DZ twins suggests that genetic variation contributes to variation in risk more than variation in non-genetic factors
Heritability
The Heritability of a trait is the proportion of total variance in a trait that is due to variation in genes. A high heritability implies that differences among individuals with respect to a trait such as blood pressure in a population can be attributed to differences in the genetic make-up. The key to interpreting heritability estimates is to remember that we’re talking about and describing variation in BOTH genetic factors AND non-genetic factors. If one (alleles or environment) doesn’t demonstrate much variability, then it doesn’t have much potential to explain variability in a trait. Implication: A high heritability does not imply that non-genetic factors are not important. A low heritability does not imply that environment is not important.
Characteristics of Complex Traits
Complex traits demonstrate one or more of the following: Incomplete penetrance, Variable expressivity, Heterogeneity, and Presence of phenocopies
Incomplete penetrance
Some conditions are described as having reduced or incomplete penetrance. This means that clinical symptoms are not always present in individuals who have the disease-causing mutation. An example of an autosomal dominant condition showing incomplete penetrance is familial breast cancer due to mutations in the BRCA1 gene. Females with a mutation in this gene have an 80% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. The penetrance of the condition is therefore 80%. , Common examples used to show degrees of penetrance are often highly penetrant. There are several reasons for this:Highly penetrant alleles, and highly heritable symptoms, are easier to demonstrate, because if the allele is present, the phenotype is generally expressed. Mendelian genetic concepts such as recessiveness, dominance, and co-dominance are fairly simple additions to this principle. And alleles which are highly penetrant are more likely to be noticed by clinicians and geneticists, and alleles for symptoms which are highly heritable are more likely to be inferred to exist, and then are more easily tracked down.
Variable expressivity
Variable expressivity occurs when a phenotype is expressed to a different degree among individuals with the same genotype. For example, individuals with the same allele for a gene involved in a quantitative trait like body height might have large variance (some are taller than others), making prediction of the phenotype from a particular genotype alone difficult. The expression of a phenotype may be modified by the effects of aging, other genetic loci, or environmental factors. Another example is neurofibromatosis, where patients with the same genetic mutation show different signs and symptoms of the disease.
Heterogeneity
the same disease or condition can be caused, or contributed to, by several factors. In the case of genetics, varying different genes or alleles. Example (allele): Cystic Fibrosis and Example (locus): Alzheimer Disease
Presence of phenocopies
Individuals who have the disease or trait for reasons that are not primarily genetic even though clinical presentation mimics the more genetic version. Example: Thalidomide-induced limb malformation vs. genetically-induced
Implications of Characteristics of Complex Traits
Because of the characteristics of complex inheritance, it is very difficult to predict whether or not individuals will develop a certain complex disease or trait, even when you may know something about their family history or their alleles at a certain locus. An example of this is that the proportion of individuals who develop Alzheimer Disease at certain ages according to their genotype at the APOE locus. This has implications for the informal genetic counseling that you may encounter in the clinical setting. These characteristics also make it difficult to identify the genetic variants that might contribute to disease. The role of non-genetic factors in contributing to variation in complex traits will vary from trait to trait and individual to individual. It’s very important to keep in mind that for some individuals, environment may play a large role, while in others their genetic make-up will play a much larger role in determining their disease risk and/or their physiologic characteristics.
Pharmacogenetics
The study of differences in drug response due to allelic variation in genes affecting drug metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity. The key conceptual elements here are that pharmacogenetics typically involves the study of just a few genes and these genes are selected based on a priori knowledge of their role(s) in drug metabolism.
Pharmacogenomics
the genomic approach to pharmacogenetics, is concerned with the assessment of common genetic variants in the aggregate for their impact on the outcome of drug therapy. Instead of analyzing individual genes and their variants according to what is known about how they influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways, sets of alleles at a large number of polymorphic loci are being identified that distinguish patients who have responded adversely to what was considered a beneficial drug from those who had no adverse response.
Pharmacokinetics
The rate at which the body absorbs, transports, metabolizes, or excretes drugs or their metabolites. Genetic Examples: Cytochrome P450, glucuronyltransferase, thiopurine methyltransferase. pharmacokinetics is concerned with whether or how much drug reaches the target(s). Pharmacokinetics is broken down further into two basic ways that drugs are metabolized through biotransformations: Phase I (simplified): attach a polar group onto the compound to make it more soluble; usually a hydroxylation step and Phase II (simplified): attach a sugar/acetyl group to detoxify the drug and make it easier to excrete. Again, recognize that genetic variation in Pharmacokinetics/dynamics and/or Phase I/II metabolism that causes phenotypic variation in drug responses between humans becomes important clinically every time you write a prescription.
Pharmacodynamics
the response of the drug binding to its targets and downstream targets, such as receptors, enzymes, or metabolic pathways. Genetic Examples: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, vitamin K epoxide complex. pharmacodynamics is concerned with what happens when the drug successfully reaches its target (note both phenomenon occur simultaneously in the race between drug effect (dynamics) and removal (kinetics).
cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genes
encode important enzymes that are very active in the liver and to a lesser extent in the epithelium of the small intestine. CYP450 enzymes metabolize a wide number of drugs. The CYP families (CYP1, CYP2, CYP3) are particularly active including six genes (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4) that are involved in the Phase I metabolism of ~90% of all commonly used medications. CYP3A4 itself takes part in the metabolism of over 40% of all drugs used in clinical medicine. There is wide genetic polymorphic variation with phenotypic consequences in the CYP families of genes, which is why they are so important to prescribing physicians. Important Point: While most CYP genes are important in the rate of inactivation of a drug, in some cases the CYP gene(s) is required to activate a drug. The classic example of this is CYP2D6 activity being necessary to convert codeine (inactive, almost no analgesic effect) to morphine (active with a potent analgesic effect).
mechanism of CYP2D6
It is important since CYP2D6 is the principle Phase I metabolizer of ~70 drugs. Lots of mutations, several of which affect function are possible and the alleles are generally classified here as: Frameshift àà alter reading frame -> NO ACTIVITY. Splicing -> skip exons and/or alter reading frame -> NO ACTIVITY. Missense -> alter protein function -> usually REDUCED ACTIVITY. Copy number alleles -> increased gene copyalleles -> INCREASED (‘ULTRAFAST. Based on the combinations (since individuals have 2 alleles in their genotypes) have 3 major phenotypes: normal, poor (includes null alleles), and ultrarapid/ultrafast. Note: some papers will define 4 different phenotypes: poor, intermediate, extensive, and ultrarapid. Important Point: Not only can CYP variation be present and important within the human species as a whole, but ethnic population differences can also be noted.
CYP3A
Substrates: Cyclosporine. Inhibitors include: Ketoconazole, Grapefruit juice, Inducers include: Rifampin, [here more relevance of environmental factors than specific genotypes]
CYP2D6
Substrates: Tricyclic antidepressants and Codeine (activates), CPY2D6 is needed to activate codeine into morphine, inhibitors include Quinidine, Fluoxetine, Paroxetine
CYP2C9
detoxifies warfarin most active metabolite. A deficiency in this gene must guide dossage