Good and Evil Flashcards
Socrates
We are innately good
Evil comes from ignorance not deliberate decision
If we knew what was good, we always would be good
Plato
Evil occurred when rational souls fails to keep control of the other appetitive souls
Failure to balance soul
Augustine
Everyone born with original sin
People are naturally evil
Only through God and religious teaching steer away from evil
Renaissance
View people are naturally good Jean Jacques Rousseau
View people are naturally bad Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes
How people can live together in peace without conflict
Thought all human motivation is selfish and tied to survival
○ Basic emotions are fear(negative) and desire for power(Positive)
○ Aggression is a basic and central part of human experience
○ In Leviathan, argued need for unaccountable, allpowerful sovereign who will create peaceful conditions to live
○ Social contract theory - with state
Rosseau
Influenced by French revolution and Karl Marx
People are naturally peaceful and decent
“Nothing can be more gentle than man in his primitive state
Book the social contract
○ “Man is born free, and he is everywhere in chains” - society create chains –> evil, immoral behaviour - negative effects of society
○ believed that agriculture and civilization corrupted people and created strife.
○ Romanticized view of peasant life.
Evaluating evidence (support Hobbes)
- To support Hobbesian view, many moral exhortations appeal to one’s self interest
○ “What you give is what you get”
○ ”I served and saw that service is joy” (Mother Theresa)
○ Coax people into behaving altruistically and self-sacrifice also appeal to self interest too
○ If we aren’t naturally selfish why do we need moral systems to nudge us toward altruistic behaviour
§ And why do we object when people don’t show gratitude
While we may be motivated by self-interest, plenty of evidence to suggest human behaviour is not purely selfish
○ Ease other people’s suffering as it is unpleasant to us?
○ Assumes relationships are transactional in nature
○ Another less costy way of dealing with it is just ignore it
○ Many people don’t; around a third of the world perform charitabel activity in a given month - where we don’t see positive impact
MODERN VIEWS
- Behaviourism
○ Environment makes people behave certain way
○ Watson
§ Can make anyone into anything based on environment
○ Skinner
§ Walden Two utopian novel using behaviourist principles- Not good or bad people, good or bad environments
- People not as a whole naturally good or evil, but some people more likely to be evil
Modern Research
ranslational evidence against Rousseau
○ Franz de Waal research on two Chmipanzee murders
○ Killing is an evolved tactic to improve killers adaptive fitness by increased access to resources
§ Can be interpreted in a Hobbesian viewpoint - desire for power, pessimistic
○ Human impact, killings are as a result of exposure to civilisations similar to Rousseau belief
○ Supports adaptive strategy hypothesis
Selfishness and money
- Having more resources is only moderately correlated with happiness - weak relationship
- Association with spending more on others is associated with happiness, spending on self had no relationship
○ Self included gifts, bills and cost of living
○ CONDUCTED BY ELIZABETH DUNN - Selfish reason to be unselfish?
- Association with spending more on others is associated with happiness, spending on self had no relationship
Cross species evidence
- Franz De Waal, chimps spontaneously comfort eachother
- Animals will refrain from an action (pulling lever for food) if it is paired with another animal getting hurt
- Animals react negatively to perceived unfairness to other animals
Role of situation
- SPE
- No good or bad people just good or bad environments
- Badly conducted experiment makes evidence not strong
- Young men, certain hormones testosterone and peersonality traits (impulsiveness) higher in younger men, does it generalise
BOTH COULD BE WRONG
- Steven Pinker hypothesis in The Better Angels of Our Nature
- Potentially due to policing improvements
- Violence war and conflict falling and have been for 15 years
- Other aspects aren’t, proliferation of democracy, trade and commerce; expansion of empathy, egalitarianism in positions of power
Definitely challenges view civilisation is making us more immoral, but isnt entirely congruent with a Social Contract Theory either