General Rule: Hearsay
Hearsay is an
+ an out of court statement
+ offered to prove truth of the matter asserted (“TOMA”)
Hearsay is generally inadmissible, unless an exception applies.
Describe Prop. 8 Application to Hearsay?
Prop 8 does not override the CA Evidence Code hearsay rules.
What is a “statement” for purposes of hearsay?
Verbal or written expression.
Assertive conduct may be treated as a “statement” - i.e., the nod of a head or pointing in a direction.
KEY here is “assertive,” so walking away or ignoring a question won’t amount to assertive conduct to substitute for a statement.
General Rule: Multiple Hearsay
Hearsay included within hearsay may be admissible only if each “level” of hearsay in the combined statement satisfies a hearsay exception (or exemption under FRE).
General Rule: Statements of Independent Legal Significance (NOT hearsay) [tip: there are four types of alternatives]
An out of court statement may be admissible where it is being offered not to prove the truth of a matter asserted (TOMA), but for another purpose.
Other purposes besides TOMA:
When is a witness deemed “unavailable” for hearsay exception purposes?
Privilege
Death or serious physical/mental illness
Attendance cannot be procured (lives/works outside of subpoena power)
Refusal despite court order (CA: only if refusal out of fear)
Testifies they do not remember (CA: considered available if only fail to remember specific subject matter)