Law and Morality Flashcards
(14 cards)
Morals (Phillip Harris)
Set of beliefs and values.
Principles affecting standards of behaviour
Features of morals
Change over time, not shared by all members of society. Many based on dominant religion in soceity
Laws (John Austin)
Set of rules recognised and applied by the state.
Command made by sovereign power
Laws and morals overlap
Yes in some case (John Salmond - two intersecting overlapping circles).
E.g. many long established have connections - laws on murder and theft bible 10 command
Changing moral view —> change law
Legalise homosexuality, as general public attitudes of these issues gradually change > law change in response to these alteration
Law changed by judges
(R v R) recognised P morality change and previous decision no longer accepted
Increasingly difficult for law to enforce morality
Parliament struggle to pass laws to please everyone’s morals and beliefs
Durkehiem (Pluralist)
Possible in small society w/ common morality and common law but in modern based on social status, income, ethinicity, etc.
Private members bills pass controversial laws to avoid revealing views on issues
Devlin
• Paternalistic approach - law should set the basic standard or morality and that society should aim for higher standards
• Devlin reacted to the Wolfenden report 1957 (led to the legalization of homosexuality in Sex Offences Act 1967) - critical & thought there should be a shared morality in society, and that society may disintegrate if morals were not upheld
Hart
• Prf Hart disagreed (influenced by utilitarian approach of JS Mill) - both thought a minority in society should not be made to conform to the will of the majority
• Hart went further - shouldn’t enforce morality as it would infringe a persons autonomy, describing such interference as unnecessary, undesirable and unacceptable
Natural law (St Thomas Aquinas)
Come from God
Fuller
Valid legal system 8 req:
- In existence
- Published
- Understandable
- Consistent
Positivists (Bentham)
Criticise natural law
H v Fuller
This disagreement seen in Hart v Fuller debate - laws made by German Gov during war were still valid (although immoral, they were legally enforceable) according to Hart
Fuller - laws went against N.law and that, as they were immoral, they were never actually valid > German courts agreed (prosecuted informants as war criminals even though what they had done was legal during the war)