Lecture 9: Mendel, Genes, and Inheritance Flashcards
final focus
- rbc in sickle-cell disease
SICKLE CELL ANEMIA
- non flexible shape making it hard to move through capillaries
- mutated gene that codes for hemoglobin so it doesn’t form O2 properly, making it difficult to deliver to cells
important bc we need o2 as final e acceptor for atp
= EXAMPLE OF INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE TOO
- even w/ a heterozygote (where recessive is the mutated), you can still take on a milder form of the disease
What is blending theory of inheritance
- hereditary traits blend evenly in offspring through mixing of parents blood
what does blending theory of inheritance NOT explain
- extremes do not gradually disappear
(sometimes offspring has traits that’s EXACTLY like 1 parent, brown eyes for ex even if the other parent has blue eyes) - offspring sometimes have traits that differ from both parents (or its not a blend, where blue+brown eyes=brown eyes NOT A BLEND OF COLOURS)
= proven false
who is Gregor Mendel
founder of genetics
-first to use scientific method to study inheritance
Mendel’s hypotheses
- 4 total, and he used experimental results to support 2 principles
1) principle of segregation
2) principle of independent assortment
Why did Mendel choose the garden pea
- easy to grow (reproduce fast)
- clearly defined characteristics (colour)
- variation in chatacter-TRAITS
characters are passed onto offspring as
genes (discrete hereditary factors)
-determine the traits for characteristics you have
true breeding garden peas
true breeding varieties
-self fertilized plants, same trait in each generation (purple flower produces all purple flowers through self-pollination)
cross-pollination
- between different parent plants
(same and different traits in each generation); i.e. white + purple flower
P vs F1 vs F2
P- parents
- plants used in the initial cross
- each pea produced contains an embryo
F1-filal (offspring)
- first generation
F2
- second generation
cross pollination proves what
about blending theory
- that blending theory isn’t true because even with a purple flower and a white flower that produces a purple offspring, its not a blend of the colours
FLOWER COLOUR CROSS (purple and white)
P- purple crossed w/ white
F1- all F1 seeds formed purple
- purple flower offspring crossed
F2- purple flowers: 75%
- white flowers: 25% (reintroduction of trait seen in P generation not in F1, but F2)
= 3:1 RATIO
- NO BLENDING !!!!!
What was Mendels First hypothesis
1) genes for genetic characteristics occur in pairs
- one gene inherited from each parents
- alleles are different versions of a gene
- diploid= two copies of a gene
- non-applicable to bacteria
What was Mendel’s Second hypothesis
2) If two alleles of a gene are different, one allele is dominant over the other
- dominant allele is expressed
- recessive allele is masked
- recessive is only expressed when two copies are present (rr)
What was Mendel’s Third Hypothesis
3) 2 alleles of a gene segregate and enter gametes singly (when they need to form gametes)
- half of the gametes carry 1 allele, half carry the other (haploid)
- PRINCIPLE OF SEGREGATION
- two gametes will fuse=zygote nucleus, containing 2 gametes (diploid)
i.e. Pp plants produce two kinds of gametes….1) P, 2)p
What is a monohybrid cross
crossing individuals to look at 1 characteristic
- done through Punnett squares
- 3:1 ratio
- results support mendels 3 hypothesis, leading to PRINCIPLE OF SEGREGATION
Homozygous vs Heterozygous
homo: both alleles are the same
- PP (dominant)
- pp (recessive)
hetero: two different alleles
- Pp
Genotype vs Phenotype
geno:
- genetic constitution
- PP, Pp, pp (3 options therefore 3:1)
pheno:
- appearance
- purple vs white flowers (2 options)
Mendel’s Predictions (what could he predict)
- classes of offspring (traits)
- proportions of those offspring
- done through sum rule in probability
sum rule and product rule
sum: DIFF EVENTS, =OUTCOME
- probability of 2 different events producing 1 outcome
- individual probabilities added
(heterozygote)
product: INDEPENDENT EVENTS
- probability of 2 independent events occurring in succession
- individual probabilities multiplied
i.e. sex of child 1 has 0 affect on outcome of child 2 (homozygote)
Results if we validate mendels hypothesis with a test cross
- cross an unknown genotype with a homozygous recessive individual
- determines if the unknown is a heterozygote or homozygote
- can validate that F2 is more heterozygous, can tell us if a purple flower is Pp (1:1 ratio, 1 white, 1 purple..see below)
crossing Pp with pp
1) Pp-purple
2) pp-white
crossing PP with pp
- all purple
1:0 ratio
What was Mendel’s fourth hypothesis
4) alleles of genes that govern 2 different characters (during meiosis) segregate independently during gametes)=PRINCIPLE OF INDEPENDENT ASSORTMENT
- occurs to independent assortment during meiosis
Dihybrid Cross results
P generation: RRYY x rryy
- RR YY produces RY gametes
- rr yy produces ry gametes
F1:
- all offspring are Rr Yy (all dominant)
Crossing F1
F1: Rr Yy x Rr Yy
- produce 4 gametes:
1/4 R Y
1/4 R y
1/4 r Y
1/4 r y
F2: offspring have 4 phenotypes
- 9/16=both dominant
- 3/16= 1 dominant one recessive
- 3/16= 1 dominant one recessive (just opposite traits as above)
- 1/16= both recessive
9:3:3:1 ratio (using sum and product rules)
Independent assortment In a cross refers to
the combinations of gametes produced by each generation
F1 x Homozygous recessive dihybrid testcross
- testcross: crossing with homozygous recessive
- 1/4=both dominant
- 1/4= 1 dominant one recessive
- 1/4= 1 dominant one recessive (just opposite traits as above)
- 1/4= both recessive
- 1:1:1:1 RATIO
supports that f1 are heterozygous