Takfir in the Quran
Danger of Takfir/speaking about the religion of Allah when one has no right in the Quran:
<aside>
> **يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّاسُ كُلُواْ مِمَّا فِى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ حَلَٰلًا طَيِّبًا وَلَا تَتَّبِعُواْ خُطُوَٰتِ ٱلشَّيۡطَٰنِۚ إِنَّهُۥ لَكُمۡ عَدُوٌّ مُّبِينٌ**
>
>
> **إِنَّمَا يَأْمُرُكُم بِٱلسُّوٓءِ وَٱلْفَحْشَآءِ وَأَن تَقُولُوا۟ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ**
>
> **O mankind! Eat of that which is lawful and good on the earth, and follow not the footsteps of Shaitan (Satan). Verily, he is to you an open enemy.**
>
> **He only orders you to evil and immorality and to say about Allāh what you do not know.**
>
> -Baqrah 168-169
>
---
- Speaking about Allahs judgment, his revelation, his religion, in a way that you do not know is following the footsteps of Shaytan
- Speaking about Allah without knowledge is considered the worst of the major sins according to a large number of scholars.
</aside>
<aside>
> **إِنَّآ أَنزَلۡنَا ٱلتَّوۡرَىٰةَ فِيهَا هُدًى وَنُورٌۚ يَحۡكُمُ بِهَا ٱلنَّبِيُّونَ ٱلَّذِينَ أَسۡلَمُواْ لِلَّذِينَ هَادُواْ وَٱلرَّبَّٰنِيُّونَ وَٱلۡأَحۡبَارُ بِمَا ٱسۡتُحۡفِظُواْ مِن كِتَٰبِ ٱللَّهِ وَكَانُواْ عَلَيۡهِ شُهَدَآءَۚ فَلَا تَخۡشَوُاْ ٱلنَّاسَ وَٱخۡشَوۡنِ وَلَا تَشۡتَرُواْ بِـَٔايَٰتِى ثَمَنًا قَلِيلًاۚ وَمَن لَّمۡ يَحۡكُم بِمَآ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ فَأُوْلَٰٓئِكَ هُمُ ٱلۡكَٰفِرُونَ**
>
>
> **Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which was guidance and light. The prophets who submitted [to Allah ] judged by it for the Jews, as did the rabbis and scholars by that with which they were entrusted of the Scripture of Allah, and they were witnesses thereto. So do not fear the people but fear Me, and do not exchange My verses for a small price. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the disbelievers.**
>
> -Maidah 5:44
>
---
- If we say Takfir is a Hukm Shar’ee then what about those who falsely use it, are they not in danger of falling into this verse?
- This ayah is an evidence against groups like the Khawarij, when they apply rulings of Takfir without the proper Islamic rules and principles, and without caution and fearing Allah, then they are the first of the people to rule by other than Allah. Allah revealed in this issue the most caution, and that it is for Allah to decree and decide, so if we don't have proper rules and regulations, observing Allahs laws, then there is a danger we might fall into the ayah that we accuse others of- ruling by other than Allah
</aside>
First principal: Severity and seriousness of Takfir as mentioned in the Sunnah
Second Principal: Verifying the Truth of What You Hear as mentioned in the Quran
> يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓاْ إِن جَآءَكُمۡ فَاسِقٌۢ بِنَبَإٍ فَتَبَيَّنُوٓاْ أَن تُصِيبُواْ قَوۡمًۢا بِجَهَٰلَةٍ فَتُصۡبِحُواْ عَلَىٰ مَا فَعَلۡتُمۡ نَٰدِمِينَO you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done, regretful-Hujurat 49:6
Another reading of this Ayah is فَتَثَبَّتُوا-establish the truth of it
This is a principal in Takfir as people base it on
none of these are allowed to base a ruling in the Shari’ah, rather for each of them we are ordered فَتَبَيَّنُوا وَتَثَبَّتُوا- Clarify, find the truth of it, establish the authenticity of it.
Ironically, people who talk about implementing the rules and laws of Allah, are the first people to take news from disbelievers, anonymous sources, non-Muslim news agencies, etc.
Takfir isn’t based on this, it is an issue of judgment, an issue where the Qadi brings witnesses to verify the news.
If you can’t establish if Kufr happened or not, you don’t have the right to make that judgment, be it a Qadi, scholar who is capable of establishing if it happened or not.
Today people make Takfir based on pictures, videos than can be easily alerted and edited, we wouldn’t want to rush to apply this on a murderer-which is the right of the creation, so how about something worse than that, Kufr which is something that deals with the right of Allah?
We wouldn’t want to rush to cut someone’s hand for theft if we can make sure that it didn’t happen, for how about for something more severe than that, that has a severe punishment both in this world and the next?
Establishing what happened is not just stablishing the event, but also establishing the circumstances around the event, if the person was compelled, if the truth was established, if they were under a false impression, if they followed someone knowledgeable who misguided them, all of these need to be verified before judgment.
Third Principle: Not Everything Considered Kufr is Actually Kufr as mentioned in the Sunnah with حَاطِبِ بْنِ أَبِي بَلْتَعَةَ
Fourth Principial: Not Every Individual Who Does An Act Of Kufr Is Necessarily A Kaffir
There are:
lets say there’s a situation where one understands the important and severity of Kufr and Takfeer, knows the action happened, knows the action is Kufr.
This leads to another stage which is:
> Not everyone who does an act of Kufr is necessarily a Kafir
rather there are conditions that have to be fulfilled, and impediments that can stop that ruling from being applied.