LESSONS 11-15 Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

Loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension; occurs in group situations that foster responsiveness to group norms, good or bad.

A

Deindividuation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a psychological-state in which the person becomes so immersed in the norms of the group that they lose their sense of identity and personal responsibility.
a condition of reduced self-evaluation within a crowd, and it is one of the most frequently observed impacts of social groups

A

Deindividuation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

group actions as irrational and inconsistent, a perspective that resonated widely with the concerns of the time.
being part of a crowd allows individuals to act on impulses that they would usually suppress or control when alone.

A

Theory of deindividuation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

He offered a politically motivated critique of crowd behavior.

A

Gustave Le Bon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When individuals feel anonymous and unidentifiable within a group, they tend to feel less accountable for their actions. This sense of anonymity can shield them from personal responsibility, leading them to act in ways they would normally suppress or control when alone.
Being anonymous makes one less self-conscious, more group-conscious, and more responsive to cues present in the situation, whether negative or positive.

A

ANONYMITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Being part of a crowd can cause individuals to become less self-aware and focused on their own identity.

A

Group Size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lynchings were often carried out by large mobs, where individuals felt less accountable for their actions due to the group’s size.
People’s attention is focused on the situation, not on themselves.

A

Lynchings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

American psychologist carried out a study that bore some resemblance to Stanley Milgram’s 1963 obedience experiment.

A

Philip Zimbardo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Opposite of deindividuation.
It involves a heightened focus on one’s own thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and a deeper understanding of one’s personal identity and values.

A

Self Awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The tendency for members of a group discussing an issue to move toward a more extreme version of the positions they held before the discussion began.
As a result, the group as a whole tends to respond in more extreme ways than one would expect given the sentiments of the individual members prior to deliberation

A

Group Polarization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

People seek positive perceptions from others and themselves, often adjusting their views to align with the prevailing opinion once they learn what others believe. Social influence affects behavior via two different mechanisms: informational externality and reputational externality

A

Social Influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when a number of people have acted or spoken, observers who lack much private information are highly likely to follow their lead

A

Informational externality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

people may do what they think others think they should do, whether or not they believe that they should do it

A

Reputational externality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A situation where individuals or groups have access to only a small set of arguments or perspectives when forming or expressing their opinions.

A

LIMITED ARGUMENT POOLS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

is any change in an individual’ s choice or decisions that occurs as a result of group discussion.

A

Choice Shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

is the tendency for the decisions of individuals to be more risky following group discussion.

A

Risky Shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

occurs when an individual making a decision as part of a group adopts a more cautious approach than the same individual would’ ve adopted had they made the decision alone.

A

Cautious Shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A convergence toward the middle, if and when new persuasive arguments are offered that are opposite to the direction initially favored by group members

A

DEPOLARIZATION

19
Q

It is the tendency of people to associate with like-minded people that positively reinforces certain beliefs

20
Q

This may occur as a result of communication and persuasion or through exposure to information and comparison of oneself with others. Exposure to arguments and ideas may lead people to reevaluate their perspective and shift their attitudes to more extreme views.

A

Informational Influence

21
Q

States that people evaluate their abilities and attitudes in relation to other people wherein self-image and subjective well-being play a significant role

A

Normative Influence

22
Q

States that virtually every member of a group privately disagreed with the prevailing attitudes and beliefs of the group as a whole whereas a member of a group has the tendency to overestimate or underestimate the attitudes or beliefs of the other group members.

A

Pluralistic Ignorance

23
Q

States that people not only classify others into social categories but they also recognize themselves in those categories and apply the stereotypes of those categories to themselves.

A

Self-Categorization Theory

24
Q

It is a strategy or rule used in a group to select an alternative among various proposed alternatives and discussed during the group ‘ s deliberations.

A

Social Decision Scheme

25
It is a conceptual perspective on group processes and intergroup relations that assumes that groups influence the member's self concepts and self-esteem, especially when the individuals categorize themselves as group members and identify strongly with the group.
Social Identity Theory
26
Mode of thinking that persons engage in when concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive in-group that it tends to override realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action.
Groupthink
27
A member of the group who, in an attempt to preserve the central group idea, omits any information which may cause doubts to arise within the group
Mindguard
28
Social facilitation is a theory in psychology that suggests people have a tendency to be more productive or have higher performance when they are in the presence of others. This includes the real presence of other people in work environments as well as the implied, imagined, or digital presence of others
Social Facilitation
29
refers to a phenomenon whereby increased task performance comes about by the mere presence of others doing the same task.
co-action effect
30
refers to a type of social facilitation in which an individual’s performance is influenced by the presence of others (an audience), which causes an individual’s dominant response to occur.
audience effect
31
This theory by Robert Zajonc explains how the presence of other people influences your performance on a task, depending on how well you’ve learned or mastered it. "Dominant response" – the most likely behavior in a given situation.
Dominant Response Theory
32
He conducted experiments involving groups of people pulling on a rope, and found that as the group size increased, the individual effort of each member decreased.
Maximilien Ringelmann
33
The term social loafing was coined by _______
Bibb Latané
34
A phenomenon where individuals exert less effort when working in a group compared to when working alone. People in groups often put in less effort because they feel less responsible and less pressured to perform individually
Social Loafing
35
emerges when individuals believe their contribution is either unnecessary or insignificant to the group's success. This is particularly common in larger groups where individual contributions are less visible and where there is a perception that one can benefit from the group's efforts without being detected or penalized for not contributing.
Free-riding
36
Unintentional Potential harm to performance Subconscious reduction of effort
Social Loafing
37
Intentional Direct harm to performance Conscious choice
Free-Riding
38
2 types of Social facilitation
Co-action effect & Audience Effect
39
SYMPTOMS OF GROUPTHINK
1. illusion of invulnerability 2. unquestioned belief in the group’s morality 3. following leads of group members to become close-minded 4. rationalization 5. stereotyped view of opponent 6. following leads of group to feel pressure toward uniformity 7. conformity pressure 8. self-censorship 9. illusion of unanimity
40
States that group polarization occurs when the opinions of the group members regarding an issue or choice will tend to become more extreme when a majority of the members favor a particular position, wherein the group will generate more arguments that will support the majority position.
Persuasive Arguments/Discursive Argumentation
41
a group of female participants was divided into two groups: one group wore hooded jackets that hid their identities, while the other group wore their own jackets with name tags, making them easily recognizable. Participants in both groups were instructed to deliver electric shocks to recipients.
ZIMBARDO ELECTRIC SHOCK EXPERIMENT
42
Factors that influence Deindividuation
Group Size Anonymity Arousing and distracting activities Self-Awareness
43
Three key mechanisms contribute to these undesirable behaviors in crowds
1. Anonymity shields individuals from being identified 2. Contagion 3. Individuals in crowds become more suggestible
44