LESSONS 11-15 Flashcards
(44 cards)
Loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension; occurs in group situations that foster responsiveness to group norms, good or bad.
Deindividuation
a psychological-state in which the person becomes so immersed in the norms of the group that they lose their sense of identity and personal responsibility.
a condition of reduced self-evaluation within a crowd, and it is one of the most frequently observed impacts of social groups
Deindividuation
group actions as irrational and inconsistent, a perspective that resonated widely with the concerns of the time.
being part of a crowd allows individuals to act on impulses that they would usually suppress or control when alone.
Theory of deindividuation
He offered a politically motivated critique of crowd behavior.
Gustave Le Bon
When individuals feel anonymous and unidentifiable within a group, they tend to feel less accountable for their actions. This sense of anonymity can shield them from personal responsibility, leading them to act in ways they would normally suppress or control when alone.
Being anonymous makes one less self-conscious, more group-conscious, and more responsive to cues present in the situation, whether negative or positive.
ANONYMITY
Being part of a crowd can cause individuals to become less self-aware and focused on their own identity.
Group Size
Lynchings were often carried out by large mobs, where individuals felt less accountable for their actions due to the group’s size.
People’s attention is focused on the situation, not on themselves.
Lynchings
American psychologist carried out a study that bore some resemblance to Stanley Milgram’s 1963 obedience experiment.
Philip Zimbardo
Opposite of deindividuation.
It involves a heightened focus on one’s own thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and a deeper understanding of one’s personal identity and values.
Self Awareness
The tendency for members of a group discussing an issue to move toward a more extreme version of the positions they held before the discussion began.
As a result, the group as a whole tends to respond in more extreme ways than one would expect given the sentiments of the individual members prior to deliberation
Group Polarization
People seek positive perceptions from others and themselves, often adjusting their views to align with the prevailing opinion once they learn what others believe. Social influence affects behavior via two different mechanisms: informational externality and reputational externality
Social Influence
when a number of people have acted or spoken, observers who lack much private information are highly likely to follow their lead
Informational externality
people may do what they think others think they should do, whether or not they believe that they should do it
Reputational externality
A situation where individuals or groups have access to only a small set of arguments or perspectives when forming or expressing their opinions.
LIMITED ARGUMENT POOLS
is any change in an individual’ s choice or decisions that occurs as a result of group discussion.
Choice Shift
is the tendency for the decisions of individuals to be more risky following group discussion.
Risky Shift
occurs when an individual making a decision as part of a group adopts a more cautious approach than the same individual would’ ve adopted had they made the decision alone.
Cautious Shift
A convergence toward the middle, if and when new persuasive arguments are offered that are opposite to the direction initially favored by group members
DEPOLARIZATION
It is the tendency of people to associate with like-minded people that positively reinforces certain beliefs
Homophily
This may occur as a result of communication and persuasion or through exposure to information and comparison of oneself with others. Exposure to arguments and ideas may lead people to reevaluate their perspective and shift their attitudes to more extreme views.
Informational Influence
States that people evaluate their abilities and attitudes in relation to other people wherein self-image and subjective well-being play a significant role
Normative Influence
States that virtually every member of a group privately disagreed with the prevailing attitudes and beliefs of the group as a whole whereas a member of a group has the tendency to overestimate or underestimate the attitudes or beliefs of the other group members.
Pluralistic Ignorance
States that people not only classify others into social categories but they also recognize themselves in those categories and apply the stereotypes of those categories to themselves.
Self-Categorization Theory
It is a strategy or rule used in a group to select an alternative among various proposed alternatives and discussed during the group ‘ s deliberations.
Social Decision Scheme