memory Flashcards

1
Q

what is free recall

A

reproducing material from memory in an unconstrained way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is cued recall

A

reproducing a specific item from memory when provided with a specific cue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is recognition

A

deciding whether you have seen something before when it’s presented to you again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is four alternative choice

A
  • choose between four options
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the types of recognition

A
  • 2 forced alternative choice
  • 3 choice alternative choice
  • yes or no
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who proposed the multistore model of memory

A

atkinson and shiffrin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the sensory register

A
  • brief sensory stores
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is short term memory

A
  • primary memory and hold things for seconds, maintained by rehearsal, limited capacity and limited duration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the long term store

A
  • secondary memory, unlimited capacity and duration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did William James define primary and secondary memory as

A
  • primary memory - sensation outlast for some little time the objective stimulus which has occasioned them
  • secondary memory - the knowledge of a former state of mind after it has already once dropped from consciousness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

jevons - the power of numerical discrimination

A

throw a handful of beans onto a black tray containing a white box. how many beans are in the white box. answer immediately.
- accurate up to about 8
- for 9 and above he was right only half the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did averbach 1963 do

A

uses a tachistoscope to display patterns of dots for brief intervals masked by a subsequent erasing pattern.
- estimates of dots as a function of total numbers and variable interval
- found that with extra viewing time up to 150ms the number of dots he could count increased steadily
- when more than 8 dots presented, extra viewing time makes relatively little difference
- limiting factor is the size of visual memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is sperling’s partial report procedure

A
  • when pp asked to recall whole grid of 12 items, maximum recall was 4 or 5
  • immediate cue to recall just one row - close to 100% accurate
  • if recall is delayed by 1s after the stimulus performance is back down to 30%
    as if full grid was once available but decays rapidly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the recency effect in STM

A
  • we can remember the last few words as theyre still in STM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the primacy effect in STM

A
  • rehearsing - repeat the earlier words more
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the serial position curve

A
  • we can recall words from beginning and end of list but not in the middle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is maintenance rehearsal

A

we repeat to keep in STM but not in LTM

18
Q

what did shallice and warrington find that criticises unitary STS

A

clinical evidence shows patients with only STM and only LTM but STM deficits arent as devastating to LTM as we expect
- form new LTM without STM

19
Q

what did baddely and hitch find about STM

A
  • stimulate STM deficits by using tasks that should fill up the STS and give a secondary task to see if they could still be completed
  • digit span
  • slows down but didn’t prevent
  • proposed that STM can’t be simple
20
Q

the multicomponent model of the STS

A
  • baddeley and hitch 1974
  • STM has 3 components
  • central executive
    -visuospatial sketchpad
  • phonological store
21
Q

what is dual task interference

A
  • spatial task and verbal output
  • difficult to do task spatially and output spatially
22
Q

phonological similarity effect

A

if items in STM sound similar they get confused - conrad and hull

23
Q

what is the irrelevant speech effect

A

salame and baddely
- recall impaired by simultaneous speech - involuntary phonological encoding

24
Q

what is the word length effect

A

baddeley et al 1975
- serial recall is approximately as many words as you can read aloud in 2 seconds
- span is lower for longer words than shorter even presented visually
- spans are longer for faster speakers

25
what is the central executive based on
norman and shallice's supervisory attention system
26
what is the role of the central executive
- control of behaviour based on action schemas - low level convection scheduling chooses next schema - SAS can over-ride the general process of contention scheduling by directly activating or inhibiting schemas
27
what was later added to the working memory model
- episodic buffer - hedonic detector
28
what is the hedonic detector
- baddeley - deal with emotional information
29
what is the embedded processes model
- no difference between STM and LTM - STM is just the currently activated component
30
what is the SIMPLE model
scale invariant memory perception and learning - brown et al - creates mathematical models based on temporal discriminability that apply to both STS and LTS
31
what is the individual differences approach
a different approach is to focus on individual differences in working memory capacity - recently researchers have separated this out into influences on primary and secondary memory - unsworth and engle
32
what did ebbinghaus 1885 find about LTM
- nonsense syllable - memories quickly and easily but has no meaning - tested himself for 2 years - seeing if it was faster when relearning - methods of saving - found a lot of LTM lost in just 20 minutes - even when tested a month later there is still 25% savings - never completely forget
33
what did bahrick find
- tested 733 peoples memory for spanish taught up to 50 years ago - results closely related to initial learning even 50 years later - memory decayed rapidly over the first few years but then levelled off
34
what did standing 1973 find about capacity of LTM
- pps watch slides for 5 seconds each and then have a recognition test 2 days later - even with 10,000 items learned performance was at 83% on a subsequent recognition test - even better with vivid pictures, though slightly worse with words
35
what did horowitz and wolfe 1998 find
- visual search has no memory - how long does it take to spot the target - takes longer when there is more distractors - we dont remember where weve looked - we don't use memory
36
what did konkle, brady, alvarez and aude 2010 find about visual LTS
- pps have to decide whether the stimuli is new or old - results depend more on conceptual similarity among items than on perceptual similarity - we seem to store the gist of pictures and not specific fine details - conceptually similar category was most difficult - the meaning of stimuli not visual
37
what does perceptually similar mean
- they look similar, they are the same shape
38
what does conceptually similar
- they don't all look the same but all have the same name
39
what did bahrick find about forgetting faces
- test teachers ability to identify previous students - after 11 days 50% dont remember, 1 year later close to 0
40
what did young, hay and ellis 1995 find about forgetting faces
- errors in face processing - 22 pps keep a diary for 8 weeks noting down all the errors they make in face recognition and identification - 1008 errors - 6 each day
41
what did schooler and engstler-schooler 1990 research
- can u improve face memory by carefully describing faces you see - verbal overshadowing of memory - verbal description impairs memory for face recognition test
42
what did melcher and schooler 1996 find
- found that the value of verbalisation can depend on expertise - novice wine drinkers have their memories enhanced by verbalisation - experts memories are unaffected - intermediate wine drinkers have their memory made worse