Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

The Zenger trial was the first?

A

American free speech dispute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hamilton’s Arguement

A

for Zenger to be guilty, his libel must be false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Zenger published

A

several seditions libels in the new york weekly journal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

zenger was acquitted because

A

the members of the jury ignored the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when members of the jury ignore what the law says and do what they believe is justice this is called

A

jury nullification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the basic purpose of the articles of the constitution

A

articulate the powers of the branches of the federal government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

article 1 of the constitution gives who power?

A

congress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

article 2 of the constitution gives who power?

A

the executive branch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

article 3 of the constitution gives who power?

A

the judiciary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the purpose of the bill of rights?

A

limit the power of the federal government by stating what it cannot do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the bill of rights specifically lists

A

the rights enjoyed by individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

who was the major driving force behind the bill of rights

A

george mason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

two level analysis by supreme court part 1

A

Is the law constitutional as written? (unconstitutional on its face)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

two level analysis by supreme court part 2

A

if yes, is the law being enforced discriminatorily? (unconstitutional as applied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what were two of the acts of the first free speech crisis?

A

sedition and alien acts of 1789

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

purpose of the sedition act

A

to outlaw written or spoken expression critical of the federal government and other and other persons and institutions when the united states is at war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

define the alien act

A

us may expel any alien at any time, without cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions ruled

A

sedition acts are illegal, passed by state legislatures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Kentucky Resolution

A

sedition is illegal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Virginia Resolution

A

sedition act violates the FA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Adams role in the bill of rights

A

opposed bill of rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

adams role in sedition and alien act

A

passed acts to silence political dissent in prep for an undeclared war on France

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Jefferson and the bill of rights and sedition acts

A

supported bill of rights, hated alien and sedition acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Madison created this plan for the three-branch government

A

the virginia plan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Marbury vs. Madison

A

established that courts have power to say what the law is, and to declare laws unconstitutional if they do not agree with the federal constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

why was marbury v. madison important

A

gave the power to the supreme court to declare laws unconstitutional (previously the supreme court had no power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

habeas corpus

A

legal proceeding in which a person who has been detained has the right to demand that the government articulate the reason for the arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

exception to habeas corpus

A

cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

power of congress v. power of president

A

only congress could suspend h/c because clause is in article 1 (outlines the power of congress)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

what were the principal issues in Merryman and Vallandigham?

A

restrictions on free speech during wartime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

14th amendment liberty clause applies to the first amendment to the states?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Gitlow v. New York

A

involved a conviction for iolation of new york’s criminal anarchy law - distinction between advocacy of overthrow, and advocacy of use of violence in overthrow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

content restrictions (3)

A

sedition, fighting words/inciting language, symbolic speech and speech plus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

sedition

A

expression that is critical of the government and/or government officials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

sedition is _______ by the first amendment

A

generally protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

the espionage act of 1917 dealt with

A

Whoever, whenever the United States… shall willfully cause or attempt to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, refusal of duty,…, or shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

the sedition act of 1918 did what with the espionage act

A

covered a broader range of offenses, notably speech and the expression of opinion that cast the government or the war effort in a negative light or interfered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Schenk v. US was an example of what standard through WWII

A

Sedition - Clear and present danger - schenck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Abrams v. US was an example of what standard through WWII

A

sedition - clear and imminent danger - russian immigrants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

The Whitney v. California case is an example of

A

state criminal syndicalism laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

whitney provided a distinction between ___ and ___

A

advocacy of overthrow and advocacy of use of violence in overthrow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Fiske refines a distinction between?

A

mere advocacy and violent action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Throughout WWII there was a movement along the spectrum for

A

protection of seditious language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What case brings to question does the first amendment apply to the states?

A

gitlow v. new york also was used in de jonge v. oregon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

why does the 1st amendment apply to the states

A

14th amendment liberty clause, incorporation doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What did the Smith Act of 1940 do?

A

rendered unlawful any advocacy of overthrow of U.S government by force or violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

“overthrow by force or violence” applies to what act?

A

smith act of 1940

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Smith Act put into statutory form the holdings of the supreme court from what 2 cases?

A

Schenck and DeJonge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Dennis vs. deals with what act and why

A

Smith Act, communist doctrine fear in the overthrowing of the US government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Yates vs. deals with what act

A

Smith act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

the Yates case provided what

A

how far one could go in rhetoric

52
Q

advocacy of government overthrow vs advocacy of use of violence appeared from what court case

A

yates

53
Q

“marketplace of ideas” a free speech concept allowing for expression of all opinions was created by who

A

holmes

54
Q

“more speech, not less speech” was who?

A

brandeis - but be imminent danger to stop free speech

55
Q

After WWII There was movement on the spectrum for

A

more protection of seditious language

56
Q

what is legislative privilege

A

right of the member of a legislature to speak freely to the house, without fear of being sued for slander

57
Q

6 rights in the first amendment

A
  1. no state established religion
  2. free exercise of religion
  3. speech
  4. press
  5. right of assembly
  6. right of petition
58
Q

prior restraints definition

A

is censorship imposed, usually by a government or institution, on expression, that prohibits particular instances of expression.

59
Q

after the speech is communicated, the speaker may be punished in certain circumstances (ex. sedition) based off of what

A

prior retrain

60
Q

the first big case on prior restraints

A

near v. minnesota - a muckraking newspaper published by near

61
Q

lesson from the Near case

A

any prior restraint is improper but unlawful speech may be punished after the fact is still possible

62
Q

The F/A protects expression which inflames public passions against government – as long it doesn’t advocate overthrowing government by unlawful means was from what case?

A

Near

63
Q

Nebraska Press Association case dealt with what?

A

Prior restraint and jury taint

64
Q

Sneep impacted our understanding of FA rights by saying that…

A

individuals can waive their first amendments bu the waiver must be voluntary and knowing

65
Q

the pentagon papers were a

A

dispute over publication of a secret history of the us involvement in the Vietnam war

66
Q

New York Times vs. US found

A

government’s national security arguement was insufficient and publication was allowed

67
Q

Two exceptions to free speech

A

national security and fair ftrail

68
Q

national security as an exception to free speech

A

injunctions against publication of material damaging to national security

69
Q

right to a fair trial as an exception to free speech

A

court orders that litigants and media may not talk/write about judicial hearings so the judicial process is not disrupted

70
Q

what did regina v. hiclin do

A

outlined the obscenity test used in great britain and the us until the mid 20th century

71
Q

3 problems with the hicklin rule

A
  1. allowed prosecutions based on isolated passages, not the entire work
  2. ignored the intended audience of the work
  3. provided little guidance as to what is, and is not, obscene; rather, it focused on the effect of the material to the consumer
72
Q

the comstock act came after

A

the post-civil war morality “crisis”

73
Q

the comstock act did what

A

prohibited the distribution of immoral materials by the us mail

74
Q

most obscenity prosecutions have been what?

A

comstock act cases

75
Q

What happened in Rosen v. US

A

rosen sent “dirty” pictures in the mail

76
Q

In Rosen, what became the accepted test for obscenity cases

A

hicklin rule

77
Q

what came about after swearingen v. US

A

definition of obscentiy

78
Q

how was obscenity defined after swearingen

A

material containing sexual content (these were the only obscenity cases moving forward)

79
Q

what question was asked in Roth vs. US? what was the answer to this question

A

is obscenity protected under the first amendment? Answer, no

80
Q

Roth vs. US rejected what? Because of the reliance on _____.

A

Hicklin. Reliance on community

81
Q

Roth Test evaluates what 5 elements initially

A
  1. average person
  2. contemporary community standards
  3. dominant theme
  4. entire work
  5. prurient form
82
Q

define prurient

A

marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome desire or interest

83
Q

Memoris v. Mass. dealt with what idea?

A

morality

84
Q

How is morality protected by the first amendment

A

controversial expression about morality is protected as long as the expression is not obscene

85
Q

memoris v. mass added which element to the Roth test

A

material must be utterly without redeeming social value

86
Q

Miller v. California rejected what 2 things

A

roth

obscene does not = sexual content

87
Q

Trend over time with fighting words/inciting language

A

protect more speech

88
Q

with fighting words/inciting language there is a development of

A

“non-protection” for worthless language (ie language which as no such inherent value

89
Q

Cantwell takeaway

A

says that some speech is not worth protecting

90
Q

Chaplinsky

A

worthless v. worthwhile speech

91
Q

what are the three types of worthless speech in caplinsky

A

lewd/obscene, libel, fighting words

92
Q

Categories of fighting words

A

offesive, provoking breach of the peace

93
Q

Court analysis in fighting words and inciting language

A
  1. is the law constitutional

2. did the defendant’s speech violate the law?

94
Q

Feiner case takeaway

A

prospect of riot; dissent; what is the proper role of the police

95
Q

Cohen case takeaway

A

ended “worthlessness” of offensive speech; speech can have emotive meaning

96
Q

Gooding case takeaway

A

to be “worthless”, provoking words must be face-to-face and likely to cause imminent violence

97
Q

free speech protection evolved from _____ to _____

A

“worthless vs worthwhile” to likelihood of inciting imminent lawless action

98
Q

What is the staple case in flag burning?

A

texas v. johnson

99
Q

communicating through taking a certain action is an example of?

A

Manner

100
Q

Why is flag burning protected by the first amendment?

A

we submit that nobody can suppose that this one gesture of an unknown man will change our Nation’s attitude towards its flag

101
Q

time, place, manner means what?

A

not what is being said but where, when, and how it’s being said

102
Q

Relavent Factors in TPM analysis

A

public vs. private property
time of day
nature of location: part, street sidewalk
Specific locations: gov’t building, university, military base
inside or ourside
use of artificial amplification
permit and/or free requirements

103
Q

The first amendment only applies to

A

government action, not private action

104
Q

Can government restrict speech on private property?

A

the rules are different from what the owner can do

105
Q

Can the government prohibit speech on the property of a private residence

A

example: commercial solicitations, non-commercial speech

106
Q

Private vs. public property is another balance of

A

liberty v. security

107
Q

Why does the first amendment apply to states and cities?

A

they are subject to the TPM rules through the application of the 14th amendment

108
Q

What is the davis case an example of?

A

place restriction on free speech

109
Q

what is the hague case an example of

A

a place restriction, in particular, permit restrictions

110
Q

what is the cox case an example of

A

municipality has authority to control its public streets

111
Q

Private property allows 2 things:

A

absolute right to exclude visitors

no need to be a captive victim of unwanted speech

112
Q

Frisby tpm restrictions said that

A

no blanket prohibition covering entire residential areas

113
Q

balance of liberty v. security in private property

whose liberty?
whose security?

A

liberty - demonstrator’s

security - homeowner’s

114
Q

the compatability use test of public property asks what question

A

is expressive activity compatible with the typical use of the property? or does the use fit with how the place is normally used?

115
Q

grayned ruling provided what rule?

A

compatibility rule

116
Q

Burson v. Freeman brought to attention what TPM topic

A

limitations on campaign activities within a certain distance of polling places

117
Q

rationale for polling place limitations

A

maintain peace and order and decorum there

118
Q

free speech in institutions is a ___ limitation

A

place limitation becauase it occurs in a certin place

119
Q

overarching consideration regarding free speech in institutions

A

what interests are at stake in balancing security v. liberty?

120
Q

two examples of the role of the institution in our society

A

high schools and military

121
Q

restrictions on high schools and the military are allowed due to…

A

the institutions role in the society, not necessarily content based.

122
Q

the Tinker case (black armbands to school) is an example of what type of speech in school

A

non-disruptive, pure speech

no indication that the work of the schools or any class was disruptive

123
Q

the Fraser case (suggestive speech by a student council candidate) is an example of what type of speech in school

A

lewd, indecent speech

“vulgar and lewd” exception from student FA right

“The First Amendment does not prevent the school officials from determining that to permit a vulgar and lewd speech such as respondent’s would undermine the school’s basic educational mission”

124
Q

the Hazelwood case (school censored student newspaper) is an example of what type of speech in school

A

speech in school-sponsored activities

schools can regulate length, distribution, etc. of school paper but not content

not protected

125
Q

the Morse case (Bong Hits for Jesus) is an example of what type of speech in school

A

speech that is not indecent, but is arguably disruptive and does not promote educational purpose

not protected