Observational techniques Flashcards

1
Q

Strength of covert observation

A

Investigator effects are less likely so less chance of demand characteristics so behaviour will seem more natural and representative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Covert observations

A

Consists of observing people without their knowledge e.g one way mirror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Weakness of covert observation

A

Ethical issues - participants not aware they are taking part in observation so can’t give consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Overt observation

A

Participants know they are being observed e.g filming publicly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strength of overt method

A

More ethical than covert, so representation of psychological research as ethical is protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weakness of overt observations

A

Investigator effects so they change their behaviour through demand characteristics , not authentic natural behaviour being observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Investigator effect

A

bias occurs when the investigator influences the behaviour of the participants in a way that’s not intended e.g facial expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Participant observation

A

Person who is conducting the observation also takes part in the activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strength of participant observation

A

Researcher can obtain in depth data since they’re in close proximity
Unlikely to overlook behaviour so allows comprehensive understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Weakness of participant observation

A

Investigator effect, changing behaviour through demand characteristics
Natural behaviour not observed so reduced internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Internal validity

A

Extent to which a piece of evidence supports a claim, within the context of a particular study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Non participant observation

A

Person conducting experiment doesn’t take part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strength of non participant observation

A

Investigator effects less likely to occur as investigator observes from a distance, representative of natural and unaltered human conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Naturalistic observation

A

Carried out in an unaltered setting, observer does not interfere in any way e.g shopping centre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strength of naturalistic observation

A

Higher level of ecological validity, reflecting spontaneous behaviour that may occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ecological validity

A

Measure of how test performance predicts real world behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Weakness of naturalistic observations

A

Issues with reliability, the test- retest method cannot be used of checking reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Reliability

A

Consistency of results

19
Q

Validity

A

Accuracy of results

20
Q

Controlled observation

A

Conducted under strict conditions e.g in an observation room or lab where extraneous variables can be controlled e.g time, noise, temp

21
Q

Strength of controlled observation

A

Can be replicated to check reliability so standardised procedures can be repeated by diff researches

22
Q

Standardised procedures

A

Making a test uniform, setting it to specific standard in which everyone is treated exactly the same and have the same experience

23
Q

Weakness of controlled observation

A

Lower level of external validity, due to artificial environment
Observation feels unnatural so may alter participants response so no longer representative of real life

24
Q

External validity

A

Findings that can be generalised, they represent the outcomes that occur in a wider population than just the sample

25
Structured observation
researcher uses coded schedules according to previously agreed formula and organise data into behavioural categories . Predetermined questions, tools, items
26
Behavioural categories
Breaking down the target behaviour (aggression) into components that can be observed and measured (hitting or kicking)
27
Strength of structured observation
Researcher can compare behaviour between participants across groups Use of behaviour categories makes coding of data more systematic (according to a fixed plan)
28
Weakness of structured observation
Not very high internal validity because researcher may miss some crucial behaviours Findings may lack the finer details
29
Unstructured observation
Involves every instance of the observed behaviour being recorded and described in as much detail as possible
30
Strength of unstructured observation
Richness of data obtained Researchers obtain comprehensive view of human behaviour High internal validity
31
Weakness of unstructured observation
Prone to observer bias due to lack of objective behaviour categories Problem with inter observer reliability as lack of constancy in observations
32
Inter- observer reliability
Degree of agreement between people observing the same thing
33
What makes something an experiment
Manipulating the IV and look at effect on DV
34
Demand characteristics
participants changing their behaviours or responses based on what they think the research is about
35
Social desirability
to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favourably by others
36
Control
The extent to which the variable is held constant by the researcher
37
Confounding variable
an unmeasured third variable that influences both the supposed cause and the supposed effect.
38
Mundane realism
The extent to which a study mirrors real life
39
time sampling
where an observer records behaviour at prescribed intervals
40
strength of time sampling
allows for a better use of time since fewer observations are made
41
limitation of time sampling
not every behaviour of relevance to the inestigation will be counted if it occurs inbetween allocated time frames
42
event sampling
observer records the number of times the target behaviour occurs
43
strength of event sampling
every behaviour of interest in theory will be counted from beginning through to end of observation
44
limitation of event sampling
theres a possibility that some behaviours could be missed if there is too much happening at same time, some not coded