Preliminary considerations Flashcards
(95 cards)
How does the buyer acquire knowledge of the Target?
Through the due diligence process
- A party interested in buying a company or business (the ‘Target’) will wish to learn all about the Target to ensure that it is:
· a worthwhile acquisition; and
· worth the consideration being paid.
- The due diligence process is expensive and time-consuming, so a buyer will not wish to embark on the process until it can be sure that:
· the seller is seriously committed to selling the Target at a price the buyer is prepared to pay; and
· the seller is not currently engaged in negotiations with one or more other potential buyers.
Before going through the due diligence process the Seller would want to insure that ….
· it obtains the best possible price for the Target; but that
· the commercial integrity of the Target is not compromised as a result of an aborted sale.
- If, however, the seller is going to release confidential information to the prospective buyer then it will want to know that:
· the buyer is seriously committed to the purchase and is not a time waster; or
· worse still, that the buyer is not an unscrupulous competitor seeking to obtain trade secrets for the benefit of its own business.
- The way in which the parties settle their respective concerns will be to enter preliminary documentation in the form of:
· heads of terms;
· confidentiality provisions;
· and lock-out or exclusivity provisions.
- Bilateral sale?
- seller negotiates with just one buyer.
- In such a situation, the buyer may take the initiative in the due diligence process by sending the seller a due diligence questionnaire but often the seller will make available due diligence documentation for the buyer’s review (often via a data room).
- In a bilateral sale, the parties will usually enter into preliminary documentation in the form of:
· heads of terms(sometimes known as heads of agreement, a memorandum of understanding, a letter of intent or a term sheet);
· confidentiality provisions; and
· exclusivity (or ‘lock-out’ ) provisions.
Are Heads of Terms legally binding?
- They act as a road map for the full form contract and, generally speaking, are not legally binding although they do have some moral force. There are some exceptions to this
What is legally binding in Heads of Terms?
· Exclusivity agreement
· Confidentiality agreement; and
· Provision for payment of costs and break fees if the deal does not proceed.
- The heads of terms are likely to include a combination of the following non-binding clauses and binding clauses:
· Non-binding
* The structure of the transaction
* The purchase price
* The form of consideration
* Any conditions (e.g. consents)
* Timetable for completion
* Responsibility for drafting the contractual documentation
· Binding
* Confidentiality
* Exclusivity/duration of negotiations
* Costs and break fees
* Governing law and jurisdiction
When are confidentiality agreements entered into and how?
* Before negotiations begin, and certainly before the prospective buyer is given any sensitive information about the Target or the seller, the seller will ask the buyer to enter into a confidentiality agreement (also known as a non-disclosure agreement) pursuant to which, in consideration for the seller providing the buyer with information regarding the Target and the seller, the buyer agrees to (and agrees to procure that its advisers will) keep such information secret. It is quite likely that the seller will want to ensure that even the fact that the Target is for sale is kept strictly confidential. Knowledge, or even rumours, of a potential sale can have an unsettling effect on the Target’s employees, its customers and suppliers. This can undermine the Target’s goodwill. It may involve the loss of sales and, possibly, the loss of key staff during the sale process. At worst, it can lead to a permanent loss of customers to a competitor.
How long do confidentiality agreements usually last?
- The obligations in the confidentiality agreement will generally survive even if the transaction subsequently does not complete. It was common for confidentiality agreements to have an indefinite term, but it is becoming more common to see confidentiality agreements with a fixed duration, with the duration depending upon the nature of the information the agreement is intended to protect. The buyer will usually also ask for confidentiality undertakings from the seller in so far as the seller obtains any confidential information relating to the buyer during the course of the negotiations. The acquisition agreement will also usually contain confidentiality undertakings from the seller to the buyer concerning information about the Target after completion of the sale.
How can the confidentiality agreement be enforced?
- Often the Target may also be a party to the confidentiality agreement in order that the Target can enforce the obligations it contains.
- Alternatively, if the Target is not a party to the agreement, then they will still have rights to enforce the agreement under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 provided.
· the agreement expressly says they can; or
· the term purports to confer a benefit on them. - In the latter case the Target can enforce the agreement unless the agreement expressly excludes this right.
- The confidentiality agreement will be entered into between the potential buyer and the seller. A potential buyer will, however, need to involve others in the process of evaluating the Target. This will generally include senior employees of the buyer and its professional advisers, banks and consultants. This may result in confidential information being passed on to these other parties.
- The seller will often require the potential buyer to procure that these parties are also bound to treat the information as confidential. The seller may even require these third parties to enter into confidentiality agreements with it, before they receive any confidential information.
What is a lock-out agreement?
- Given that a due diligence investigation is an expensive and time-consuming exercise, a prospective buyer is likely to want some form of protection against losing out to a rival bidder. Whether or not the buyer is able to secure this protection will depend on the strength of the buyer’s bargaining position. If the buyer is able to obtain protection, this will take the form of an exclusivity agreement, also known as a lock-out agreement.
When us a lock-in agreement enforceable?
provided that it was certain (so, for a fixed and specified period) and supported by consideration or made under seal (by deed).
What are break-fee agreements?
- Traditionally, break fee agreements provided for a fee to be paid to the buyer if a specified event occurred which prevented the proposed purchase of the target from completing.
- Nowadays, break fee agreements may work both ways - with each party agreeing to pay the fees of the other party if the first party fails to complete for specified reasons. The extent to which the fees will be paid, and the trigger events, will depend on the bargaining strengths of the parties concerned.
Does FSMA apply to share sales?
- FSMA applies to share sales, so it is important for clients and their advisers to consider both the general prohibition on carrying out regulated activities under s. 19 FSMA and the restrictions on financial promotions under s. 21 (1) FSMA.
o When giving advice to a seller on a share sale, it is important to consider the provisions of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (‘FSMA’). In this context, there are a number of provisions of which clients and their advisers need to be aware:
The general prohibition under s.19(1) FSMA; and
The restrictions on financial promotion under s.21(1) FSMA.
- The general prohibition under s.19(1) FSMA
o applies to solicitors carrying out ‘regulated activities’. The same restrictions apply to clients. On this basis, a client can only carry on a regulated activity if it is authorised to do so or if a relevant exemption applies.
o Specified activity + specified investment = regulated activity
o ‘Specified activity’ and ‘specified investment’ are defined in Parts I and III FSMA 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001
o Specified activities include:
Art 14: ‘dealing in investments as principal’
Art 21: ‘dealing in investments as agent’
Art 25: ‘arranging deals in investments as agent’
Art 53: ‘advising on the merits’
* A group of assets or a business is not a ‘specified investment’. So, in the context of a business sale, FSMA is not relevant. FSMA does apply to share sales, as shares are defined as a specified investment.
- Exclusions from the general prohibition
o There are both specific and general exclusions from the FSMA general prohibition under FSMA 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001. The one that is most likely to apply on the sale of the entire issued share capital of a corporate subsidiary is Art 70.
o Art 70 provides that a person will not be carrying on an activity of a kind specified by articles 14, 21, 25 and 53 by entering into a transaction:
· If the transaction is to acquire or dispose of shares in a company and the shares being sold/bought consist of or include 50% or more of the voting shares in the body corporate AND the acquisition or disposal is between parties each of whom is: a body corporate; a partnership; a single individual; or a group of connected individuals; OR
· If the transaction is to acquire or dispose of shares in a company and the shares, together with any already held by the buyer, consist of or include at least 50%of the voting shares in the body corporate AND the acquisition or disposal is between parties each of whom is: a body corporate; a partnership; a single individual; or a group of connected individuals**.