Research methods Flashcards
4 experimental methods and explain
Lab - takes place in a specific environment, whereby different variables can be carefully controlled
Field - more natural environment, not in a lab but with variable still being well controlled
Natural - the IV it’s not brought about by the researcher, hence would’ve happened even if the researcher had not been there
Quasi - the IV has not been determined by the researcher, instead, it naturally exists eg: gender and age. No rando, allocation can occur
The for non-experimental methods
Self report (questionnaires and interviews)
Observations
Case studies
Correlational studies
Aim define
General statement made by researcher
Tells us what they plan on investigating
The purpose of their study
Aim is developed from theories and develop from reading about other similar research
Hypothesis define
Precise, testable statement of what the researchers predict will be the outcome of the study which clearly states the relationship between the variables being investigated (IV and DV)
What does the experimental method concern
The manipulation (changing) of the IV to have an effect on the DV which is measured and stated in results
Types of hypothesis and types of experimental/alternative hypothesis and what they are
Null hypothesis - predicts no differnce or relationship between the 2 conditions
Alternative hypothesis / experimental hypothesis: predicts a differnce or a relationship between groups/conditions
Non directional (two tailed) - Predicts a difference or a relationship between groups/conditions but does not state the direction of the difference/relationship
Directional (one tailed) - Predicts a difference or a relationship between conditions and states the direction of the difference/relationship. Used when there’s already pre-existing similar research
Independent and dependant variables
IV - been manipulated (changed) by the researcher or simply changes naturally to have an effect on the DV
To test the effect of IV we need different conditions: the experimental and control condition
DV - measured by the researcher and has been caused by a change to the IV
All other variables affecting the DV should be controlled (extraneous variables) so the researcher can conclude that the effect on the DV was caused by just the IV
Operationalisation of variables define
Variables should be defined and measured
make the hypothesis testable and measurable
Control of variables
Extraneous and confounding variables define
Extraneous- any other variable (which is not the IV) that affects the DV and does not very systematically with the IV. aka nuisance variables
EV could affect the results (DV) but a confounding variable has affected the results (DV)
Eg: age and gender of p’s and lighting of lab
Confounding - a variable other than the IV which has an affect on the DV but also does change systematically with the impact of the DV as the confounding variable could have been the cause
Confounding variable is a type of EV that hasn’t been controlled
Control of variables
Demand characteristics and investigator effects
Demand characteristics - any cue the researcher or the research situation may give which makes the participant guess the aim of the investigation and change their behaviour due to participant reactivity and affect the validity of the results
Please you effect - act in a way they think the researcher wants them to
Screw you effect -intentionally and performed to sabotage the studies results
Participant reactivity can lead to investigator effects
Investigator effects:any unwanted influence from the researchers behaviour (conscious or unconscious) on the DV measured (the results) for example facial expressions or over explaining the task to the participants
Includes a variety of factors, such as the design of the study, the selection of participants and the interaction with each participant during the research investigation
Control of variables
Randomisation and standardisation
A way to minimise the effects of extraneous or confounding variables
Randomisation is the use of chance to reduce the effects of bias from investigator effects
Standardisation: using the exact same formalised procedures and instructions for every single participant involved in the research process
This allows there to eliminate nonstandardised instructions as being possible extraneous variables
Strengths and weaknesses of the labatory experiment
-High control over extraneous variables
Experiments is controlled all the variables and Iv has been precisely replicated between conditions so has high internal validity
-Replication - researchers can repeat experiments and check reliability of results due to standardisation
-Experimenters bias
-Low ecological validity - high degree of control and environment makes the situation artificial so has low mundane realism
-ppts know they’re being tested so increases demand charectaristics so lowers internal validity
Strengths and weaknesses of field experiments
-Naturalistic environment - natural behaviours therefore high ecological validity whilst still having a Controlled IV
-ppts don’t know they’re in an experiment so reduces demand charectarisitcs
Ethical considerations - invasion of privacy and no informed consent
Loss of control over extraneous variables so precise replication Isnt possible and harder to establish cause and effect so lower internal validity
Strengths and weaknesses of a quasi experiment
Controlled conditions - replicable so can check for reliable results and have a high internal validity
Cannot randomly allocate participants to conditions- so there may be participant confounding variables, lowers internal validity
Strengths and weaknesses of natural experiment
-Provides opportunities: for research that might not otherwise be undertaken for practical or ethical reasons. They offer unique insights.
-High ecological validity as you’re dealing with real life situations
-diffcuilt to establish causality due to lack of controls over variables
-ppts may not be randomly allocated to conditions so increases participant confounding variables so lowers internal validity
Define sampling
The researchers need to decide how they select participants to take part in the investigation
The population is a group of people from whom This sample is drawn.
Define and describe the 5 sampling methods
Opportunity sampling:
Participants happen to be available at the time which the study is carried out so recruited conveniently
Random sampling
Target population has Equal chances of being the one that is selected for the sample
Each member population is assigned a number, then either a random number table or A random number generator or the lottery method is used to randomly choose a partner
Systematic sampling
Participants are chosen from a list of the target population.
Every Nth participant is chosen to form the sample
Stratified sampling
By selecting from within strata, The characteristics of participants within the sample are in the same proportion as found within the target population.
You identify strat then calculate the required proportion needed for each stratum based on target population. Then select sample at random from each stratum using a random selection method
Volunteer sampling
Involve self selection where ppt offers to take part in response to an advert or when asked to
What must studies be in order to trust the results
Reliable and valid
Why is reliable studies important
Methodology – design measure and procedures
Effects – the patterns of results
Reliable methodologies – produced the same/similar results every time they’re used with a particular sample of individuals
Reliable effects – replicated across a number of different studies and individuals
Measures of external reliability:
Test-retest – measures test consistency and reliability over time
Same test on the same person on differnt occasions.
If results achieve a correlation co-efficient of 0.8 or above then we assume it’s reliable
Inter rater / observer – degree of agreement among raters to reduce bias,if there’s a high positive correlation (0.8+) between the observers/raters the measure is reliable
If you have a correlation of 1 it’s 100% prediction of A and B
4 ways of improving reliability
observations – improve training given to raters to increase accuracy, use pilot studies to identify procedural weaknesses
- interviews – structured interviews are more reliable than unstructured
-questionnaires – use closed rather than open questions
-experiments – use standardised procedures use established tests rather than new ones
Validity define
the extent to which something is measuring what it is claiming to measure
Internal validity define and how it’s measured
Internal: extent to which a study establishes a cause and effect relationship between IV and DV
split half method: split test into 2 parts, participants complete both parts, test the strength of correlation,
Correlations shown on a scatter graph
Large positive correction – high + strong correlation
Small negative correlation
Types of extraneous variables
Participant variables – differences between participants
Situational variables – features of the experimental situation
Other EV’s - eg: researcher bias, demand charectaristics (please you or screw you) and order effect (practise or fatigue