{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "name": "Brainscape", "url": "https://www.brainscape.com/", "logo": "https://www.brainscape.com/pks/images/cms/public-views/shared/Brainscape-logo-c4e172b280b4616f7fda.svg", "sameAs": [ "https://www.facebook.com/Brainscape", "https://x.com/brainscape", "https://www.linkedin.com/company/brainscape", "https://www.instagram.com/brainscape/", "https://www.tiktok.com/@brainscapeu", "https://www.pinterest.com/brainscape/", "https://www.youtube.com/@BrainscapeNY" ], "contactPoint": { "@type": "ContactPoint", "telephone": "(929) 334-4005", "contactType": "customer service", "availableLanguage": ["English"] }, "founder": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Andrew Cohen" }, "description": "Brainscape’s spaced repetition system is proven to DOUBLE learning results! Find, make, and study flashcards online or in our mobile app. Serious learners only.", "address": { "@type": "PostalAddress", "streetAddress": "159 W 25th St, Ste 517", "addressLocality": "New York", "addressRegion": "NY", "postalCode": "10001", "addressCountry": "USA" } }

Test I Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

Name all of the Fallacies of Relevance.

A

There are eight:

1) Red Herring
2) Straw Man
3) Accident
4) Ignoratis Elenchi (Missing the Point)
5) Argumentum ad Populum (Appeal to the People)
6) Argumentum ad Hominem (Argument Against the Person)
7) Argumentum ad Baculum (Appeal to Force)
8) Argumentum ad Misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name all of the Fallacies of Weak Induction.

A

There are six:

1) Hasty Generalization
2) False Cause
3) Slippery Slope
4) Weak Analogy
5) Argumentum ad Verecundiam (Appeal to Unqualified Authority)
6) Argumentum ad Ignorantiam (Appeal to Ignorance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name all of the Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Illicit Transference.

A

There are four fallacies of presumption:

1) Complex Question
2) False Dichotomy
3) Suppressed Evidence
4) Petitio Principii (Begging the Question)

There are two fallacies of ambiguity:

1) Equivocation
2) Amphiboly

There are two fallacies of illicit transference:

1) Composition
2) Division

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Identify the premises and the conclusion of the following argument:

Carbon monoxide molecules happen to be just the right size and shape, and happen to have just the right chemical properties, to fit neatly into cavities within hemoglobin molecules in blood that are normally reserved for oxygen molecules. Consequently, carbon monoxide diminishes the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood.

A

P1: Carbon monoxide molecules happen to be just the right size and shape to fit neatly into cavities within hemoglobin molecules in blood that are normally reserved for oxygen molecules.

P2: Carbon monoxide molecules happen to have just the right chemical properties to fit neatly into cavities within hemoglobin molecules in blood that are normally reserved for oxygen molecules.

C: Carbon monoxide diminishes the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Identify the premises and the conclusion of the following argument:

When individuals voluntarily abandon property, they forfeit any expectation of privacy in it that they might have had. Therefore, a warrantless search or seizure of abandoned property is not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

A

P1: When individuals voluntarily abandon property, they forfeit any expectation of privacy in it that they might have had.

C: Therefore, a warrantless search or seizure of abandoned property is not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Identify the premises and the conclusion of the following argument:

It really does matter if you get enough sleep. We need sleep to think clearly, react quickly, and create memories. Studies show that people who are taught mentally challenging tasks do better after a good night’s sleep. Other research suggests that sleep is needed for creative problem solving.

A

P1: We need sleep to think clearly, react quickly, and create memories.

P2: Studies show that people who are taught mentally challenging tasks do better after a good night’s sleep.

P3: Other research suggests that sleep is needed for creative problem solving.

C: It really does matter if you get enough sleep.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

T/F: The purpose of the premise or premises is to set forth the reasons or evidence given in support of the conclusion.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

T/F: All arguments must have more than one premise.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Determine whether the following argument is inductive or deductive:

Because triangle A is congruent with triangle B, and triangle B is isosceles, it follows that triangle B is isosceles.

A

Deductive, based on mathematics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Determine whether the following argument is inductive or deductive:

No e-mail messages are eloquent creations. Some love letters are eloquent creations. Therefore, some love letters are not e-mail messages.

A

Deductive, conclusion follows necessarily from the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Determine whether the following argument is inductive or deductive:

Paying off terrorists in exchange for hostages is not a wise policy, since such action will only lead them to take more hostages in the future.

A

Inductive, based on prediction/casual inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Determine whether the following deductive argument is valid or invalid:

Since “Moby Dick” was written by Shakespeare, and “Moby Dick” is a science-fiction novel, it follows that Shakespeare wrote a science-fiction novel.

A

Valid, unsound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Determine whether the following deductive argument is valid or invalid:

The longest river in South America is the Amazon, and the Amazon flows through Brazil. Therefore, the longest river in South America flows through Brazil.

A

Valid, sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Determine whether the following deductive argument is valid or invalid:

All leopards with lungs are carnivores. Therefore, all leopards are carnivores.

A

Invalid, unsound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Determine whether the following inductive argument is strong or weak:

The grave marker at Arlington National Cemetery says that John F. Kennedy is buried there. It must be the case that Kennedy really is buried in that cemetery.

A

Strong, cogent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Determine whether the following inductive argument is strong or weak:

Franklin Delano Roosevelt said that we have nothing to fear but fear itself. Therefore, women have no reason to fear serial rapists.

A

Weak, uncogent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Determine whether the following inductive argument is strong or weak:

People have been listening to rock and roll music for over a hundred years. Probably people will still be listening to it a year from now.

A

Weak, cogent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

T/F: Inductive arguments allow for varying degrees of strength and weakness.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

T/F: A valid argument may have a false premise and a false conclusion.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

T/F: A statement may legitimately be spoken of as “valid” or “invalid.”

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Identify the fallacy of relevance committed by the following argument:

The position open in the accounting department should be given to Frank Thompson. Frank has six hungry children to feed, and his wife desperately needs an operation to save her eyesight.

A

Argumentum ad Misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Identify the fallacy of relevance committed by the following argument:

Whoever thrusts a knife into another person should be arrested. But surgeons do precisely this when operating. Therefore, surgeons should be arrested.

A

Accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Identify the fallacy of relevance committed by the following argument:

Surely you welcome the opportunity to join our protective organization. Think of all the money you will lose from broken windows, overturned trucks, and damaged merchandise in the event of your not joining.

A

Argumentum ad Baculum (Argument by Force)

24
Q

Identify the fallacy of weak induction committed by the following argument:

The “Daily News” carried an article this morning about three local teenagers who were arrested on charges of drug possession. Teenagers these days are nothing but a bunch of junkies.

A

Hasty generalization

25
Identify the fallacy of weak induction committed by the following argument: The secretaries have asked us to provide lounge areas where they can spend their coffee breaks. This request will have to be refused. If we give them lounge areas, next they'll be asking for spas and swimming pools. Then it will be racquet ball courts, and fitness centers. Expenditures for these facilities will drive us into bankruptcy.
Slippery Slope
26
Identify the fallacy of weak induction committed by the following argument: No one has ever been able to prove the existence of extrasensory perception. We must therefore conclude that extrasensory perception is a myth.
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam (Appeal to Ignorance)
27
T/F: If an arguer cites a statement by a recognized expert in support of a conclusion and the statement falls within the expert's range of expertise, then the arguer commits an appeal to unqualified authority.
False.
28
T/F: In the appeal to ignorance, the arguer accuses the reader or listener of being ignorant.
False.
29
T/F: If an argument from analogy depends on a causal or systematic relationship between certain attributes, and there is good reason to believe that this relationship exists, then the argument commits no fallacy.
True.
30
Identify the fallacy of presumption, ambiguity, and illicit transference committed by the following argument: Either we require forced sterilization of the Third World peoples or the world population will explode and all of us will die. We certainly don't want to die, so we must require forced sterilization.
False Dichotomy
31
Identify the fallacy of presumption, ambiguity, and illicit transference committed by the following argument: James said that he saw a picture of a beautiful girl stashed in Stephen's locker. We can only conclude that Stephen has broken the rules, because girls are not allowed in the locker room.
Amphiboly
32
Identify the fallacy of presumption, ambiguity, and illicit transference committed by the following argument: People who lack humility have no sense of beauty, because everyone who has a sense of beauty also has humility.
Begging the Question
33
T/F: The fallacy of equivocation arises from a syntactical defect in a statement.
False.
34
T/F: Equivocation and amphiboly are classified as fallacies of ambiguity.
True.
35
T/F: The fallacy of composition always proceeds from whole to parts.
False.
36
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Hasty Generalization
Fallacy of Weak Induction
37
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Red Herring
Fallacy of Relevance
38
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Straw Man
Fallacy of Relevance
39
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Argumentum ad Misericordiam
Fallacy of Relevance
40
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Accident
Fallacy of Relevance
41
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Argumentum ad Populum
Fallacy of Relevance
42
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Argumentum ad Populum
Fallacy of Relevance
43
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Argumentum ad Hominem
Fallacy of Relevance
44
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Argumentum ad Baculum
Fallacy of Relevance
45
Name the type of fallacy for the following: False Cause
Fallacy of Weak Induction
46
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Slippery Slope
Fallacy of Weak Induction
47
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Weak Analogy
Fallacy of Weak Induction
48
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Argumentum ad Verecundiam
Fallacy of Weak Induction
49
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Argumentum ad Ignorantiam
Fallacy of Weak Induction
50
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Complex Question
Fallacy of Presumption
51
Name the type of fallacy for the following: False Dichotomy
Fallacy of Presumption
52
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Suppressed Evidence
Fallacy of Presumption
53
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Petitio Principii
Fallacy of Presumption
54
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Equivocation
Fallacy of Ambiguity
55
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Amphiboly
Fallacy of Ambiguity
56
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Composition
Fallacy of Illicit Transference
57
Name the type of fallacy for the following: Division
Fallacy of Illicit Transference