Top Down Approach Offender Profiling Flashcards
What is offender profiling
A tool employed by the police to narrow down the list of likely suspects
What idea is offender profiling based on
The idea that characteristics of the offended can be deduced from the details of the offence & crime scene
Profiling methods vary, but what do they usually involve
- careful scrutiny of the crime scene
- analysis of evidence e.g. witness reports, to generate a hypothesis about the character of the offender
Eg. For the character: Age, background, occupation
What’s the top down approach
Templates of the organised / disorganised offender are pre-existing in the mind of the profiler. Evidence from the crime scene & other details of the crime / victim / context are then used to fit the offender as either organised or disorganised
What is an organised offender / their characteristic
- they show evidence of having planned the crime in advance:
The victim is deliberately targeted & will often reveal the fact that the killer / rapist has a preference for a certain type of victim. - they maintain a high levell of control during the crime / operate w surgical, detached precision
What’s the crime scene of an organised offender like
Little evidence left behind at the scene
Characteristics of organised offenders
- above average intelligence
- in a skilled, professional occupation
- socially & sexually competent (often married / have kids)
What are disorganised offenders
These show little evidence of planning - the crime may be spontaneous
Very little control
What’s the crime scene of a disorganised offender like?
Tends to be messy with lots of evidence
Reflects impulsive nature of the attack
Body usually left at the scene
Characteristics of a disorganised offender
- lower than average intelligence
- unskilled in work / unemployed
- history of sexual dysfunction / failed relationships
- usually life alone / close to the murder
What’s bad about top-down profilings application
Only applies to certain crimes
E.g. rape, arson, cult killings, murders that involve macabre practices e.g. sadistic torture, dissection etc
Common offences. E.g. burglary don’t reveal much about the offender by the crime scene
What’s bad about the organised / disorganised offender distinction? How is it a weak sample etc
- developed based on interviews with 36 serial killers in the USA.
Therefore too small / unrepresentative of a sample to base a typology system
Why is top drown profiling less valid bc of what it was based on
It was developed based on the 36 sexually motivated serial killers like Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson
Canter argued that self report data from convicted killers isn’t valid to rely on
- the organised disorganised distinction is overly simplistic: who suggested there’s other types of serial killers
Holmes’s (1989) suggests that there are 4 types of serial killer; visionary serial killer, mission, hedonistic, and power serial killers
What’s a visionary serial killer
They kill because God or the Devil is directing them to