Treatments for Offenders Flashcards

1
Q

FRIENDSHIP AND CANN

Cognitive Skills Programme used with offenders

A

CSP are based on the belief that before a criminal act can occur it must be preceded by criminal thoughts and therefore if the faulty criminal thinking patterns are stopped then progress can be made towards a non-criminal lifestyle.

  1. Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R&R)
    Designed to provide offenders with the opportunity to learn and experience new behavioural and cognitive skills. Compromises of 35 sessions and includes 7 modules such as problem solving, negotiation skills, creative thinking and critical reasoning.
  2. Enhanced Thinking Skills (ETS)
    Intended to develop prisoners cognitive skills and targets their thinking styles, self-control and interpersonal skills. Compromises of 20 sessions and is available in 78 establishments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FRIENDSHIP 2002
(Effectiveness of cognitive skills programmes)
Aim

A

To evaluate the success of cognitive skills programmes for prisoners.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FRIENDSHIP 2002
(Effectiveness of cognitive skills programmes)
Method

A

Quasi experiment.
The experimental group took part in the CSP and the control group did not but this was not manipulated by the researchers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FRIENDSHIP 2002
(Effectiveness of cognitive skills programmes)
Participants

A

670 adult male offenders serving a sentence of two or more years who voluntarily participated in the cognitive skills programme between 1992 & 1996.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FRIENDSHIP 2002
(Effectiveness of cognitive skills programmes)
Procedure

A

The programme focused on correcting faulty thinking patterns which have been linked to offending behaviour. Participants received either 20 or 36 sessions.

The main aims of the programme included the development of skills that helped the men gain:
Self-control
Interpersonal problem solving skills
Social perspective taking
Understanding the rules which govern behaviour

Reconviction rates for the two groups were compared.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FRIENDSHIP 2002
(Effectiveness of cognitive skills programmes)
Results

A

There was a significant drop in reconviction rates. Reconviction rates after two years were up to 14% lower than the comparison group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FRIENDSHIP 2002
(Effectiveness of cognitive skills programmes)
Conclusion

A

Cognitive skills programmes are successful in reducing reconviction rates.
Following the publication of this report the cognitive skills programme was rolled out across the prison service in the belief that it was a cost effective way of reducing the prison population in the long term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CANN 2006
(Impact of CSP in reducing re-conviction rates)
Aim

A

To find out if cognitive skills programmes were effective in terms of lowering re-conviction rates for a sample of women prisoners.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CANN 2006
(Impact of CSP in reducing re-conviction rates)
Participants

A

180 women offenders who had started Enhanced Thinking Skills (ETS) or Reasoning & Rehabilitation (R & R) between 1996 and 2000.

The comparison group was made up of 540 offenders who did not participate in these programmes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CANN 2006
(Impact of CSP in reducing re-conviction rates)
Procedure

A

The expected 2 year reconviction rates were calculated for all the women and they were then matched on whether they were at high, medium or low risk of conviction.
Actual reconviction rates were calculated for 1 year and 2 years after release.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CANN 2006
(Impact of CSP in reducing re-conviction rates)
Results

A

There was no significant difference between the groups for expected re-conviction rates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

CANN 2006
(Impact of CSP in reducing re-conviction rates)
Conclusion

A

Cognitive skills training may not be an effective treatment strategy for female offenders.

Cann argued that the results for women were because:
• Women offend for different reasons than men. Women offend because of drug abuse, relationship problems, emotional factors & financial.
• The programmes were not appropriate for the women’s needs, having been developed for men and with men’s risk factors in mind.
• The programmes were not delivered consistently in the women’s prisons & were limited in length, not meeting the standards required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

IRELAND 2000
(Describe ‘anger management’ as a treatment programme for offenders)
Background

A

Anger management is a therapeutic treatment programme that assumes violence is caused by anger and that if violent individuals learn to control their anger their violent behaviour will decrease. They are based largely on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Techniques (CBT) where they combine behaviourist principles of reinforcement and positive cognitive processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IRELAND 2000
(Describe ‘anger management’ as a treatment programme for offenders)
Aim

A

To assess the effectiveness of a group-based anger management programme.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

IRELAND 2000
(Describe ‘anger management’ as a treatment programme for offenders)
Method

A

Quasi Experiment, taking advantage of two naturally occurring groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

IRELAND 2000
(Describe ‘anger management’ as a treatment programme for offenders)
Participants

A

Experimental group of 50 young male prisoners who had completed the anger management course (made a comparison between pre and post scores for a treatment).

Control group of 37 young male prisoners who had been assessed as suitable for such a course but had not actually completed one.

The two groups were matched in terms of age, offence and level of angry behaviours reported prior to completing the course.

17
Q

IRELAND 2000
(Describe ‘anger management’ as a treatment programme for offenders)
Procedure

A

Both groups were assessed on two measures 2 weeks before the start of the course and eight weeks later:

1) A Prison Officers’ behavioural checklist
(a checklist completed by prison officers concerning 29 different angry behaviours with scores of 0, 1 or 2 for how often a particular prisoner had shown them in the previous week)

2) An anger management assessment questionnaire, which was a self report questionnaire completed by the prisoners, consisting of 53 items which could indicate an anger problem.

The experimental group participants were given 12 one hour sessions over a three day period. Within these sessions they:
• Became aware of the process by which they become angry
• Were informed of the benefits of controlling their anger
• Improved their techniques of anger management
• Were allowed to practice anger management through role plays

18
Q

IRELAND 2000
(Describe ‘anger management’ as a treatment programme for offenders)
Results

A

Prison Officers’ checklist – There was a significant reduction in angry behaviours in the experimental group but no difference in the control group.

Anger management questionnaire – The experimental group scored significantly lower on self-reported angry behaviours after completion of the course.
There was no difference for the control group.
Overall 92% of the prisoners in the experimental group showed improvement on at least one measure.

19
Q

IRELAND 2000
(Describe ‘anger management’ as a treatment programme for offenders)
Conclusion

A

In the short term the anger management programme could be considered a success and significantly reduced disruptive/angry behaviour in prisoners.
However, there is no later re-conviction data so we cannot know if the programmes effects were sustained after leaving prison.

20
Q

WHEATLEY 2007
(How has ear acupuncture been used as a treatment programme?)
Background

A

Acupuncture was developed prior to scientific medicine and involves fine needles being inserted into traditionally determined points in the body.
Ear acupuncture involves stimulating key points in the ear and can reduce craving to drugs in the brain.

21
Q

WHEATLEY 2007
(How has ear acupuncture been used as a treatment programme?)
Aim

A

To assess the effectiveness of ear acupuncture in treating substance abuse of prisoners.

22
Q

WHEATLEY 2007
(How has ear acupuncture been used as a treatment programme?)
Participants

A

350 prisoners in 6 high-security prisons who received acupuncture and the standard care programme which is called FOCUS.
Control group did not receive acupuncture but did get the standard care programme.

23
Q

WHEATLEY 2007
(How has ear acupuncture been used as a treatment programme?)
Procedure

A

Two trained practitioners worked with groups of 10-15 prisoners in a relaxed setting.
Fine needles were inserted into five acupuncture points in the ear and then the prisoners relaxed for a 40-minute period, they then returned to normal duties.

24
Q

WHEATLEY 2007
(How has ear acupuncture been used as a treatment programme?)
Results

A
Qualitative data:
Prisoners reported improvements in wellbeing such as
• Better sleep
• Improved relaxation
• Better coping skills
• Reduced cravings for nicotine
• Amended cognitions
• Health improvements
• They made more effort to communicate with their families & attend classes.

Quantitative data:
• 70% reduction in drug related incidents
• 42% reduction in positive drug testing results

25
Q

WHEATLEY 2007
(How has ear acupuncture been used as a treatment programme?)
Conclusion

A

The author believes that there is enough evidence for the effectiveness of ear acupuncture to expand the delivery of the programme throughout the prison system & believes that acupuncture works as a complementary therapy with other programmes.