Vicarious Liability Flashcards
(14 cards)
Define Vicarious Liability
Is the legal imposition of liability upon an overseeing party for the tort of another, who they are responsible for.
What are the 2 tests for vicarious liability?
- The tortfeasor must be an employee of the employer or there is a relationship ain to employment between the tortfeasor and the employee.
2.The tortious actions must fall within the course of employment or be sufficiently closely connected to the employment.
- The tortfeasor must be an employee of the employer or there is a relationship ain to employment between the tortfeasor and the employee- case
Barclays Bank Plc v Various claimants
doctor-sexual assault
was an independent contractor
2.The tortious actions must fall within the course of employment or be sufficiently closely connected to the employment- case
Jehovah Witnesses v BXB
Female was raped
not liable as it was not closely connected to employment/course of employment
What are the 3 tests to determine a” relationship of employment”
- Control test- employer had control over what the employee did
- Integration test- Was it fully for the business- not independent contractor
- Economic reality test-
Factors to find a relationship akin to employment ( make it fair, just and reasonable to hold them responsible)
By the Christian Brothers case
- Likely to have means of compensation.
- The tort committed as a result undertaken by the tortfeasor on behalf of the employer.
- Was part of some business activity of the employer.
- Employer had created the risk of tort (employing them)
- Employer maintains a degree of control over the tortfeasor.
Cox v ministry of justice
The case for Factors to find a relationship akin to employment ( make it fair, just and reasonable to hold them responsible).
The tortious actions must fall within the course of employment
Actions in the course of employment….
- Authorised acts
- Authorised acts done in a way that is prohibited or negligently.
Shelborne v CRUK
“Frolic of their own”
Rose v Plenty
The tortfeasor is acting in the course of employment.
What are the two ways considered outside of the course of employment
- Actions falling outside the scope of employment.
- Actions taken outside of the employment remit.
Mohamud V Morrisons supermarket
Responding to customers was an aspect of the tortfeasors job- abuse was connected. Following him to his car did not mean it was unconnected as he was still working.
Lister v Hesley
Intentional and unauthorised wrongdoings commited by the tortfeasor for their own benefit can still be under VL.
Morrisons Supermarket v Various Claimants
If an employee intentionally harms the employer, as an vendetta to the employer, the tort will not be considered closely connected and will not be in the course of employment.