1: Intro to Delict & Negligence Flashcards

Los: be able to provide a reasoned legal analysis of a set of given facts and circumstances, know and understand both the general principles of the law of delict, and the regimes that govern specific types of event. You need to be able to identify the factors that trigger specific rules and identify correctly the appropriate rules to be applied.

1
Q

What did Stair classify obligations as being

A
  • conventional
  • obediential
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe conventional obligations

A

Those obligations that arise due to the will of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe obediential obligations

A

Those obligations that are imposed by the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe legal obligations in the law of delict

A
  • ex lege (on law)
  • take reasonable care
  • Culpa: obligation to make good of a loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe legal obligations in law of contract

A
  • *ex contractu *(by way of consent)
  • ex voluntante
  • consent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where are there overlaps between legal obligations in law of delict and law of contract

A
  • fraudulent misrepresentation
  • exclusion of delictual liability by use of contract terms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Aim of reparartion in delict

A

To make good of a particular loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe law of delict - Scotland

A
  • Based on the systematics of the law of obligations laid down by Stair within the general framework of theius commune
  • Developed from Roman Law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe Law of tort - England & Wales

A
  • Not a single complete body of law but a set of individual torts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Areas that are the same, similar, different regarding law of delict and law of tort

A
  • Same= negligance, vicarious liability, privacy, generally applicable defences
  • Difference= defamation, nuisance, trespass, and remedies
  • Similariaties but with some differences= occupier’s liability, liability for animals, assault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a delict

A

“The province of the law of delict, stated most generally, is therefore the legal duties of forbearance from inflicting harm on others and the consequential duty of making reparation…when harm has been done.” (Walker, The Law of Delict in Scotland)
* Thus, conduct which is actionable in a civil court by a pursuer who has suffered a legally recognised loss.
* Delict is concerned with compensating harm
* Note, not all losses can be compensated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the basis for a Delictual Claim

A
  • General rule - no liability without fault: Culpa - fault or blame, required unless strict liability applies
  • General principles - Damnum injuria datum (loss caused by legal wrong):
    1. damnum - loss
    2. injuria - wrongful conduct
    3. datum - causal link between 1 & 2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain reparation

A
  • Reparation - making good the loss/damage caused
  • The obligation to make reparation arises from wrong doing and is imposed by law
  • Includes: physical, mental or ‘nervous’ injury, damage to property, financial loss (derivative). damage to reputation.
  • Will not include ‘pure economic loss’ (exceptions).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What qualifies as a loss?

A

Any unjustified and non-trivial invasion of a protected (reparable) interest is a loss

  • physical integrity and personal wellbeing
  • ownership and possession
  • liberty
  • reputation
  • privacy
  • rights incidental to ownership of heritage porperty e.g. right to exclusive possession; right to comfortable enjoyment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To be reparable, loss must be caused (injuria). How can the loss be caused?

A

Culpably, either:
a) Intentionally
i. Intending harm to the victim or
ii. Deliberately, in knowledge of the harmful consequences or indifference to them or,
b) Negligently (unintentional)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the grounds of liability

A
  • The ground (basis) on which an action will proceed depends on: the form taken by the loss complained of and, the way in which it has been occasioned.
  • The rules of liability and available defences differ according to the ground.
  • There are specific delicts (grounds or regimes) e.g. nuisance, assault, defamation and,
  • There is a general action (raised in claims arising from negligence and claims based generally on wrongfulness rather than on any specific delict)
17
Q

What is the ground of action for personal injury and property harm caused negligently

A

general action

18
Q

What is the ground of action for personal injury caused intentionally

A

assault or harrassment

19
Q

What is the ground of action for deprivation of liberty

A

wrongful detention

20
Q

What is the ground of action for interference with comfortabler enjoyment of heritable property

A

nuisance

21
Q

What is the ground of action for interference with right to exclusive possession of heritable property

A

trespass

22
Q

What is the ground of action for economic losses caused negligently and intentionally

A
  • general action
  • fraud, passing off, inducing breach of contract, causing loss by unlawful means, conspiracy
23
Q

What circumstances invoke a statutory regime which may operate along with or instead of the common law?

A

Personal injury, death or damage/ destruction of property…

  • Caused by a danger due to the state of premises or to things done on premises: Occupiers’ Liability (Scotland) Act 1960
  • Caused by ananimal: Animals (Scotland) Act 1987
  • Caused by a defective product: Consumer Protection Act 1987
24
Q

When is unintentional harm actionable

A

if there is a breach of the legal duty owed by the wrongdoer

25
Q

What are the 4 tests for establishing a claim in negligence

A
  1. Duty of Care: is there duty of care owed aand to whom is it owed i.e. Scope
  2. Breach of Duty: has there been a breach of duty? i.e. duty not implemented
  3. Causal Link: did the breach cause the harm i.e. causal link between loss/harm and breach
  4. Remoteness: is the loss proximate or not too remote
26
Q

Give example of ‘normally recoverable losses’

A

Personal injury and property damage arising from positive conduct by the defender

27
Q

(9)

Give examples of ‘possibly recoverable losses’

A
  • personal injury and property damage arising from omissions
  • personal injury and property damage caused by a third party
  • harm to reputation
  • deprivation of liberty
  • economic loss
  • psychiatric harm suffered as a secondary victim
  • losses incurred in breach of statutory duty or in the exercise of statutory powers
  • and novel circumstances
28
Q

What is the duty of care

A

The essential pre-requisite for liability for negligently caused harm
* Operates to limit the scope of liability
* Used as a threshold device to open up or restrict liability ingiven circumstances
* The duty of care is not an obligation

29
Q

Explain how duty of care is established

A
  • D does something which carries a risk of harm to others if sufficient care is not exercised
  • If P suffers loss then P must establish that D owed P a duty to avoid causing P loss of the type P has suffered
30
Q

What does Brodie identify as 3 main principles, guides or tests as to the exiatence of a duty

A
  1. the neighbour principle
  2. the Hedley Byrne reliance/ assumption of responsibility principle
  3. the incremental or pragmatic approach to the imposition of a duty where none has been recognised before, where there is no governing precedent
31
Q

What is the thin skull rule?

A
  • No duty per se arises from a pursuer’s unknown susceptibility
  • But, if there is a breach of duty the wrongdoer must “take the victim as he finds him/her”