11_MiCAR Regulation of Crypto Assets Flashcards
Regulatory Hurdles of Blockchains
- Move digital assets
- in traditional capital markets intermediaries such as banks are regulated
- how could blockchains be regulated? in a distributed infrastructure who is responsible?
What is a token from legal perspective?
- no general legal concept under German civil law
- Right, Thing or other object?
Legal Risk of Transfer of Tokens
- risk that right and token fall apart
- in Liechtenstein -> Article 7 of TVTG: “ Disposal over the Token results in disposal over the right represented by the token”
Legal Arrangements for Tokenisation in Germany
1. German Electronic Securities Act (eWpG) - 2021
- electronic seucirties are central registered securities and crypto securities
- limited scope: bearer bond (Inhaberschuldverschreibung) and funds
- in future: shares (Zukunftsfinanzierungsgesetz)
- transfer is regulated by law -> no risk of token and right falling apart
**2. Other tokenised rights: **no legal act!
- various legal arrangements are possible -> posible risk of token and right falling apart
- Mitigation: e.g. reward model, takeover of agreement
Overview
Regulation of Token
- 2018: 5th AML-Directive of European Parliament and of the Council
- 2020: Transformation of 5th AML-Directive to German Law
- 2023: European Regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCAR)
5th AML-Directive (EU2018/843)
2018
- intends to address money laundering and terrorist financing risks
Transformation of 5th AML-Directive to German Law
2020
Crypto assets = financial instruments
- “accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange or payment by virtue of an agreement or actual practice or is used for investment purposes
- certain activities regarding crypto-assets are regulated comparable to traditional security, banking and financial services (e.g. investment brokerage or properiatry trading)
-> require BaFin’s authorisation - safeguaridng private cryptographic keys for customers is a financial service (crypto custody services)
-> require BaFin’s Authorization - AML-obligations for providers of regulated services
MiCAR Scope
lays down uniform requirements:
- for the offer to the public and
- admission to trading on a trading platform of crypto-assets as well as
- requirements for crypto-asset service providers
- [prevention of market abuse]
MiCAR Regulatory objectives
- securing market integrity and financial stability (in particular prevention of market abuse and financial crime)
- Enabling the use of innovatie technology (“future-proof economy”, economic growth and new employment opportunities)
- fostering innovative and inclusive ways of financing (including for small and medium-sized enterprises)
- Protection of retail holders
- same regulation in all member states (prevention of regulatory arbitrage)
MiCAR Fact Sheet
- Will apply in every member state of Europe (no transformation in national law required)
- MiCAR entered into force in june 2023
- MiCAR’s regulation will apply from 30 December 2024
- Exception: MiCAR’s regulation on the issuance of stablecoins will apply from 30 June 2024
MiCAR not yet applicable but crypto industry should prepare itself as compliance will need to be in place from date of applicability
MiCAR
A few things to keep in Mind
- MiCAR has broad understanding of crypto-assets -> MiCAR is not limited to blockchain-based tokens
- All Transferable tokens are covered by MiCAR -> unless miCAR explicitly excludes them (in particular securities and NFTs, loyalty schemes)
Which crypto-assets are excluded from MiCAR?
- securities: crypto-assets that fall within scope of existing union legislative acts on financial services
- NFTs: crypto asset that are unique & non-fungible
Which Tokens qualify as securities (security tokens)?
- Required: Functional comparability with securities
- BaFin: Characteristics comparable to those of traditional financial instruments such as shares, debt, securities or units in investment funds (substance over form)
- membership rights or claims under debt law with pecuniary content, similar to share and debt instruments
- comparable to participation in company (e.g. participation, invovlement and voting rights)
- comparable to pecuniary rights (claims against issuer of token or against another party for pecuniary performance such as interest, profit participation)
Not required: Howey Test (Investment contract/security under US laws)
- investment of money
- shared enterprise (success of investors is connected)
- reasonable expectation of profits solely from efforts of others
NFTS
Which tokens qualify as unique and non-fungible?
Smart Contract Standard (technical understanding)
- Smart Contract Standard ERC20: **fungible **within a technical meaning
- Smart Contract Standar ERC721: Non-fungible within a technical meaning
NFTS under legal understanding
- assets or rights represented should also be unique and non-fungible in order for the crypto-asset to be considered unique and non-fungible
- MiCAR should also apply to crypto-assets that appear to be unique non-fungible
- issuance of crypto-assets as NFTs in large series or collection should be considere an indicator of their fungibiility
- competent authorities hsould adopt a substance over form approach whereby the features of crypto-asset in question determin classifciation and not its designation by issuer