negligence Flashcards

1
Q

what must c prove to show that d owed a duty of care,they are in breech and the damage they suffered caused breech

A

balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

stage 1

A

duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Robinson v ccwy shows the court can assume that …

A

the court can assume a duty exists if an existing precedent or statutory authority covering stating it does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is camparo dickman

A

3 part test
reasonable person foreseen harm
proximate
fair just and reasonable to impose a duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when do u use robinson

A

if there is already a well established duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when do you use caparo

A

if it is a novel situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

reasonable person would’ve forseen harm occurring case

A

kent v griffith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

proximate in physical time and space or relationship case

A

Bourhill v young

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

is it fair just and reasonable to impose duty case

A

hill v ccwy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

stage 2

A

breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

conduct must be compared to the reasonable person case

A

Blyth v BWW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are professionals compared to w case

A

the reasonably competent body of fellow professionals with that skill -bolam v fiern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

competent professional case

A

bolam v fiern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

children are compared to the reasonably competent child of the same age and gender case

A

mullins v richards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

no allowances for inexperience case

A

nettleship v weston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

other risk factors considered (5)

A

special characteristics
size of risk
appropriate precautions
known risk
social utility

17
Q

special characteristics case

A

paris v stephney

18
Q

size of risk case

A

bolton v stone

19
Q

precautions case

A

lamiter v AEC

20
Q

known risk case

A

Roe v MOH

21
Q

social utilities case

A

Watt v HCC

22
Q

stage 3

A

damages

23
Q

must discover the factual cause of damages with the but for test what’s the case

A

barnett v chelsea

24
Q

intervening acts case

A

mckew v holland

25
Q

third party

A

knightley v johns

26
Q

natural event

A

carsolgie

27
Q

must be RF case

A

wagon and mound

28
Q

does specific damage need to be RF

A

no

29
Q

D can be liable if damage is more serious or happens in an unexpected way case

A

Bradford v robinson rentals

30
Q

eggshell rule def and case

A

smith v leech brain and pre-existing conditions making them more susceptible to harm