judicial precedent Flashcards

1
Q

what is judicial precedent

A

this principle means that a court must follow and apply the law as set out in the decisions of higher courts in previous cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the court heirachy

A

supreme court
court of appeal
high court
crown court
magistrates courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what precedent do all the courts have to follow

A

binding precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does binding precedent mean

A

each court is bound by the decisions made by a higher court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does the term ratio decidendi mean

A

“the reason for the decision” this is the binding element and must be followed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does the term stare decisis mean

A

“to stand by previous decisions” binding precedent. refers to the follow aspect of judicial precedent means to stick with that decision and apply it to other similar cases. e.g. Donahue v Stevenson and Daniels v white.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does the term obiter dicta mean

A

“things said by the way” persuasive precedent. this points to other things that may have been mentioned during the verdict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is persuasive precedent

A

previous decisions made by lower courts that don’t have to be followed by higher courts. they can use it as influence but they do not have to follow it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is awkward precedent

A

precedent that cannot be followed therefore the judge has to overrule, distinguish, reverse or depart.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is original precedent

A

a decision in a case where there has been nothing like it before therefore it is completely new and original.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are all the possible methods of judicial precedent

A

follow
overrule
reverse
distinguish
depart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does “follow” mean

A

if the facts of one case fit the ones of a previous case then that previous decision can be followed and used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is a case example for follow

A

Donoghue v Stevenson and Daniels v white

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what does overrule mean

A

a higher court can overrule the decision made in a lower court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are case example of overrule

A

rondel v Worsley (1969) and hall v Simons (2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does reverse mean

A

on appeal a higher court can change the decision of a lower court

17
Q

what is a case example for reverse

A

re Pinochet 1998

18
Q

what does distinguish mean

A

when a lower court points top material differences between cases to justify the application of different principles

19
Q

what is a case example of distingish

A

Balfour v Balfour

20
Q

what does depart mean

A

in certain circumstances a court can depart from its previous decision

21
Q

what is a case example of depart

A

Addie v Dumbreck 1929 and British railway board v Herrington 1972

22
Q

what are the advantages to judicial precedent

A

1- just system- similar cases will be treated the same
2- flexibility- case law can change quickly to adapt to society
3- practice rules- due to case law coming out of real life scenarios, there is a lot of material and detailed rules

23
Q

what are the disadvantages to judicial precedent

A

1- undemocratic - judges are not elected in so why should they be allowed to change or adapt law
2- rigid- lower courts have to follow decisions from h9gher courts
3- complex- case law gives us thousands of cases and pieces of law identifying relevant principles can be time consuming.