past paper questions Flashcards
what is compliance?
publicly changing behaviour whilst maintains a different private view
what is conforming to the behaviour of a role model?
identification
briefly outline and evaluate the findings of any one study of social influence
•Milgram
•65% went up to the maximum voltage, influenced by situational variables like uniform, location and proximity
•Artificial task
Discuss two explanations of resistance to social influence
•locus of control- people with an internal locus of control are more likely to resist pressure to conform and less likely to obey than those with an external locus of control; people with an internal locus of control believe they control their own circumstances; they are less concerned with social approval.
•social support- defiance/ non-conformity is more likely if others are seek to resist influence; seeing others disobey/ not conform gives the observer the confidence to do so; description of forms of social support- disobedient role models, having an ally, explanation of why these produce resistance (e.g. breaks the unanimity of the group in conformity situations, challenges legitimacy of authority figure)
outline two explanations for obedience
•authoritarian personality: a collection of traits developed from strict parenting; examples of traits include - conformist, obedient, disapproving towards people of a lower status
•legitimacy of authority: setting, status of authority figure
•agentic shift: person ‘unthinkingly’ carries out orders; diffusion of responsibility
use your knowledge of conformity and minority influence to explain the factors that will determine how successful a small group of students will be in convincing a majority
•the majority are more likely to be convinced if the minority are consistent, flexible and committed
•variables affecting conformity like group size and unanimity
•informational/ normative social influence leading to internalisation
•ACCASS
outline the procedures of Zimbardo’s research into conformity to social roles
••Zimbardo set up a mock prison and Stanford university
•they advertised for willing participants and selected those deemed as ‘emotionally stable’ after psychological testing.
•participants were randomly assigned the role of either a guard or a prisoner
• the prisoners were treated like real prisoners and arrested in their homes
•the social roles of the prisoners and the guards were strictly divided
•the prisoners had 16 rules they had to follow and were only referred to by a number
•the guards had uniform and equipment, and were told they had complete power over the prisoners
outline the findings of Zimbardo’s research into conformity to social roles
•there was a slow start but then the guards behaviour became a threat to the prisoners psychological and physical health. the study was stopped after 6 days instead of the intended 14
•after 2 days, the prisoners rebelled aggressively. the guards played the prisoners against eachother
•the guards frequently harassed the prisoners and do head- counts to assert authority
•after the rebellion was put down, the prisoners become depressed and subdued
•many were released over the first few days regarding concerns for their well-being
•the guards administered brutal and harsh punishments, with some of them appearing to enjoy the power
briefly discuss two criticisms of Zimbardo’s research into conformity to social roles
•ethical issues: lack of informed consent, lack of protection from psychological harm
•zimbardo playing a ‘dual-role’. zimbardo’s own behaviour affected the way in which events unfolded, thus the validity of the findings could be questioned
•methodological issues: sample bias, demand characteristics/ lack of internal validity; lack of ecological validity/ mundane realism
discuss research into two or more factors that affect the reliability of eyewitness testimonies
•misleading information, including leading questions
-loftus and palmer ‘car crash’ study where the verb in the question was changed
-loftus and palmer, ‘did you see broken glass’
•anxiety
-loftus weapon focus experiment found that more participants correctly identified a person holding a pen (49%) than a person holding a knife covered in blood
-Yuille and Cutshall
•post event discussion
~ issue of validity in laboratory studies or lack control in real-life situations
~ methodological issues, including sampling, replication
~ ethical issues
~ practical applications/ implications of the research
explain how Asch’s conformity research illustrate the features of science- replicability, theory construction and hypothesis testing
•replicability- Asch’s studied had standardised procedures (the number of confederates; length of lines) which meant that they could be replicated to assess consistency/ reliability of the findings; this increased the validity of the conclusions drawn
•theory construction- Asch’s findings led to the development of explanations/ theories of conformity (that people will conform to group pressure to avoid ridicule- normative social influence)
•hypothesis testing- Asch’s research tested the assumption that naive participants would conform to an obviously wrong answer when placed under group pressure; this was achieved by manipulating an IV (fake/ genuine answer) to measure the effect on the DV and keeping other (possible confounding) variables consistent
what are legitimacy of authority and agentic state?
•legitimacy of authority- when a person recognised their own and others position in a social hierarchy. legitimacy is increased by visible symbols of authority (uniform), legitimacy of setting, order, system
•agentic state- when a person acts on behalf of an authority figure/ person of higher status. the actor feels no personal responsibility/ does not feel guilty for their actions. the opposite of autonomous state in which people act according to their own principles. binding factors decrease the moral strain.
describe how zimbardo investigated conformity to social roles
•set up a mock prison in the basement of stanford university
•observational study- controlled, participant, overt
•emotionally stable volunteers were assigned to the roles of either prisoner or guard
•prisoners ‘arrested’, blindfolded, strip searched ect
•guards given a night stick, uniform and told to maintain order
•prisoners daily routines were heavily regulated by guards working in shifts
•dehumanisation of prisoners (numbered)
•the study was planned to run for two weeks, but was stopped early
use your knowledge of social influence processes in social change, explain why fewer and fewer people are using single- use plastic items
•minority influence processes- consistency, commitment (augmentation principle), flexibility- snowball effect, views change gradually over time
•conformity processes- normative social influence/ compliance- informational social influence/ internalisation
•obedience processes- rules
what is normative social influence likely to lead to?
compliance