theft cases Flashcards
appropriation core case
morris
morris
held ds conviction was upheld as hol’s stated that that there does not have to be ban an assumption of all the rights
consent
lawrence
lawrence
d argued the student had consented to giving the £6 but boath the coa and the hoL rejected this saying there had still been an appropiation the consent was irrelevant
property
oxford and moss
oxford and moss
knowledge of the questions on an exam paper was held not to be property
belonging to another core case
turner
turner
the car was in possesion and control of the garage so it was property belonging to another therefore D was guilty of stealing his own car
property recieved under an obligation
davidge v bunnett
davidge v bunnett
as the money had been given for a specfic purpose he had a legal obligation to deal with it in that way so it was property belonging to another
under the sale of goods where extar change is given
gilks
under contract extra money given
attorney general refrence
where was dishonesty outlined
ivey v genting casinos
where was dishonesty confirmed
bartoon and booth
mens rea core case
ivey v genting casinos
