2 - CA Testis Flashcards

1
Q

Common presentation of testicular cancer

A

1) Usually painless unilateral testicular mass
2) Scrotal pain in ~20%
3) 2-7% Gynaecomastia, usually in non-seminomatous tumour, esp stromal tumour
4) Back pain or abdominal mass from bulky retroperitoneal metastasis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Testicular mass Ddx incidence based on age

A

1) 16-18m: pure yolk sac tumour (commonest)
2) <4yo: pure teratoma (2nd common)
3) 20-35yo: NSGCT
4) 30-40yo: Seminoma
5) >60yo: Lymphoma, TB, spermatocytic seminoma

Bimodal for both yolk sac tumour (16-18m and 25-35yo) and teratoma (<4yo and 20-40yo)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

⭐️ How would you assess a patient presenting with testicular mass?

A

I would see him in the clinic setting in a comfortable environment

I would obtain a thorough clinical history, including:
- Onset and duration of testicular swelling
- Whether it is enlarging
- Painful or painless
- Any trauma
- Sexual Hx, UTI or STD Sx
- Any constitutional Sx

Ask for risk factors for CA testis, e.g.:
1) Personal History:
- Hx of cryptorchidism / UDT
- Hx of contralateral tumour or TIN
- Hx of sub fertility
- HIV
(X Maternal estrogen exposure)
(X Klinefelter syndrome)
(X Race)
2) Family History
- Testicular tumour in 1st degree relatives

Social history:
- marital status
- number of children, fertility wish

Physical examination
1) Scrotal exam:
- exam contralat. testis first
- then the enlarged testis for size, location of mass, attachment to skin or spermatic cord
2) Abdominal exam for enlarged LN or organomegaly
3) Any inguinal scars from childhood orchidopexy
4) Chest exam
- Gynaecomastia suggestive of elevated B-HCG
- Auscultation for lung masses
5) Supraclavicular LN

Arrange urgent ultrasound scrotum with transducer at least 7.5 MHz (Mega Hertz)

Bloods x tumour markers
- AFP
- Beta HCG
- LDH

Contrast CT T+A+P for M staging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Genetic changes of CA testis

A

1) iso-chromosome of short arm of chromosome 12 (i12p)
- 80% GCT has at least one i12P

2) Alteration of p53 locus
- seen in 66% of testicular TIN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Risk factors for CA testis

A

Personal History:
1) Hx of cryptorchidism / undescended testis
2) Hx of contralateral tumour or GCNIS
3) Hx of subfertility
4) HIV
5) Klinefelter syndrome
6) Maternal estrogen exposure
7) Scandinavian

Family History
1) Testicular tumour in 1st grade relatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CA testis pathological classification

A

WHO pathological classification:

0) Germ cell neoplasia in-situ (GCNIS)

1) Germ cell tumours
a) Seminoma
b) Non-seminoma
- embryonal carcinoma
- teratoma
- yolk sac tumour
- choriocarcinoma
- mixed

2) Sex cord-stromal tumour
- Leydig cell
- Sertoli cell tumour
- Granulosa cell tumour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the imaging of choice for diagnosing CA testis?

Please give specific technical request

A

Ultrasound of testes
With transducer of at least 7.5 MHz (mega Hertz)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What to look for on USG scrotum for scrotal mass?

A

1) Diagnosis of testicular cancer
- almost 100% sensitivity
- can differentiate intra-testicular vs. extra-testicular lesion

2) Assess contralateral testis

3) See any testicular atrophy (<12mL) which is an indication for contralat testis Bx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Serum markers for CA testis, what are their:
- Roles
- Half Life
- Normal value
- Source and Implication

A

Role: Diagnosis, staging, and prognosis

1) Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP) ➔ 5, 7, 10
- T1/2 = 5-7 days
- Normal <10
- from yolk sac cells (cytotrophoblastic element)
- i.e. Suggestive of Embryonal, Yolk Sac, Teratoma with yolk sac component (never in pure chorio or pure seminoma)

2) Beta hCG (B-hCG) ➔ 36, 5
- T1/2 = 36 hours
- Normal <5
- from syncytiotrophoblasts
- i.e. Suggestive of Embryonal (40-60%), ChorioCA (100%), Seminoma (10-30%)

3) Lactate Dehydrogenase
- T1/2 = cannot be calculated due to isoforms (usually around 4 days)
- Proportional to tumour volume and cell necrosis

±4) Placenta Like Alkaline Phosphatase (PLAP)
- T1/2 = 24 hours
- For monitoring in pure seminoma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Do all patients have raised tumour markers at presentation? (Viva book Q)

A

(Viva book Answer)
No, only ~51% of testicular tumour would have elevated tumour markers

For Seminoma, ~10-30% has elevated B-hCG (never high AFP if pure seminoma)

For NSGCT (non-seminomatous germ cell tumour), ~90% has elevated tumour markers (50-70% with high AFP from yolk sac component, 40% with high B-hCG).

Elevated βhCG is found in 100% of choriocarcinoma and 40%–60% of embryonal carcinoma cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the significance of LDH in testicular cancer? (Viva book Q)

A

This is useful in determining tumour burden and is a surrogate marker for tumour volume and cell necrosis.

This is usually helpful for seminomas and to the oncologist as a measure of tumour response. It is raised in approximately 10% of seminomas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Are there any other condition in which testicular cancer tumour markers may be raised? (i.e. false positive)

A

Other conditions and malignancies can elevate the markers:

1) AFP
- liver HCC / pancreatic / stomach / lung
- smoking, alcoholism
- liver conditions e.g. cirrhosis, hepatitis, Wilson’s disease
- IBD
- Ataxia telangiectasia

2) B-HCG
- liver / pancreatic / stomach / lung
- Cannabis use
- Cirrhosis
- IBD
- Heterophilic antibodies
- Cross-reactivity of assay with elevated LH (e.g. in primary hypogonadism i.e. hypergonadotrophic), so need to check exogenous testosterone

3) LDH is non-specific
- liver disease
- heart disease
- kidney disease
- cancers, lymphoma
- skeletal muscle injury
- etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

After initial assessment and USG, how would you manage a young man with suspected testicular cancer?

A

1) I would arrange for an urgent radical inguinal orchidectomy within ~1 week

I would offer further counselling and assessments in regards to:
2) Need of contralateral testicular biopsy
3) Sperm banking
4) Testicular prosthesis insertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How would you perform a radical inguinal orchidectomy? (Viva book Q)

A

Obtain informed consent, performed within 1 week’s time

GA or SA procedure, supine position

Inguinal incision

Early clamping of the cord / pedicle control with non-crushing vascular clamp, prior to manipulation of testis
- to control the draining lymphatics
- minimise tumour spill and metastatic release to the LNs

Cord is transfixed and ligated in bundles, with a prolene suture left long to act as a marker for future nodal dissection

Testis is removed with epididymis and spermatic coverings and cord, transected at the deep inguinal ring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What surgical approach can be used if patient wishes for diagnosis before orchidectomy for testicular mass?

(Henry’s notes)

A

Consider intra-op frozen section with:

1) Testicular bivalve
2) Chevassu maneuvre
- occlusion of the testicular vessels before biopsy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why inguinal orchidectomy, but not scrotal approach for CA testis?

A

Testicular CA usually metastasise by lymphatic spread. Drainage is predictable and stepwise to retroperitoneal nodes. Inguinal approach can preserve the normal lymphatic drainage.

If scrotal violation:
1) Lymphatic drainage will be altered, with risk of inguinal LN metastasis
2) Higher local recurrence rate with scrotal approach (EAU 2023) i.e. 2.5% vs. 0% (blue book)

(but does not increase systemic relapse or overall survival)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why do we need to consider sperm banking before inguinal orchidectomy?

(Henry’s notes)

A

Risk of subfertility or infertility during course of CA testis treatment:

1) Baseline abnormality (EAU 2024):
- 24% are azoospermic
- 50% have abnormal sperm parameters even before treatment

2) After inguinal orchidectomy:
- 4% will become azoospermic

3) After RPLND:
- 80% anejaculation if full template
- 7% anejaculation if modified template

4) After chemotherapy:
- all patients become azoospermic around 3 months after chemo
- 50% recover after 2 years
- 80% recover after 5 years

5) After radiotherapy:
- dose dependent, with permanent sterility if dose >6 Gy
- recovery may take up to 2-3 years

6) Also chemo & RT are teratogenic (EAU 2024): contraception must be used during treatment and for at least 6 months after its completion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How does a patient sperm bank? Any special issues to inform the patient

A

1) Assessment in fertility clinic / sperm bank
- FSH / LH / AM testosterone
- 3 semen samples for analysis with 2-3 days of abstinence

2) Also need to check HIV / HBV / HCV
- if positive, then need separate storage vessel / facility

3) Sample is then frozen in liquid nitrogen at -196’C
- banking can still be done within first few weeks of chemotherapy

4) Special issue (Viva book Ans):
- Only ~10% of patient would use the sperm
- Maximal storage year = 10 years
- quality of sperm is not guaranteed when thawed
- illness prior to or at the time of banking would affect sperm quality
- some research showed that quality of sperm is poor in germ cell cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What do you know about insertion of testicular prosthesis? How is it inserted?

A

EAU (2024): Testicular prosthesis should be offered to all patients receiving unilateral or bilateral orchidectomy

Only FDA approved testicular implant is saline-filled implant called Torosa. Different sizes available.

Not associated with increased length of stay / re-admission / return to theatre rate (BJUI 2016 Audit)

Insertion technique:
- same session after inguinal orchidectomy
- anchor star or button at inferior pole, sutured to Dartos to prevent migration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Complications of testicular prosthesis

A

1) Erosion, or even Extrusion from scrotum 3-8%
2) Scrotal contraction and migration 3-5%
3) Chronic pain or discomfort 1-3%
4) Scrotal oedema
5) Haematoma
6) Infection 0.6-2%
➔ may delay chemo therefore some oncologist does not prefer if likely need chemo e.g. mets or very high tumour markers
➔ however in BJUI 2016 audit of 900 patients, showed no adverse infective consequences
7) Deflation or rupture
8) Pulmonary embolism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Would you recommend contralateral testis biopsy during CA testis treatment? Explain the indication and arguments

A

Rationale: to identify GCNIS (germ cell neoplasia in-situ) and metachronous CA testis:
- 9% risk of contralateral GCNIS
- 2.5% risk of metachronous CA testis
- Maase BMJ 1986 classical paper: if untreated GCNIS then 50% progression to germ cell tumour in 5 years (70% in 7 years)

1) Overall low incidence (9% and 2.5%)
2) Morbidity of overtreating GCNIS
3) Most metachronous tumours are at low stage

Therefore I would choose a risk-stratified approach for patients with high risk for contralateral GCNIS
EAU 2023 suggested:
1) Contralateral testicular volume <12cc
2) History of crypto-orchidism
+) Not necessary in patients > 40 years without risk factors

Additional risk factors to be considered including:
- poor spermatogenesis with Johnson score 1-3
- Age <40yo
- extra-gonadal GCT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the risk of contralateral GCNIS in CA testis?

A

Up to 9% (EAU 2023), but depends on risk factors

According to landmark papers:

1) Harland, JU 1998
- overall risk = 5%
- Hx of UDT = 4%
- Age ≤30 and volume <12mL = 34%

2) Dieckmann, EU 2007
- Age ≤40 and volume <12mL = 18%
- Age ≤40 and poor spermatogenesis score = 54%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How would you perform contralateral testis biopsy?

A

Open inguinal approach

Two-pole technique:
- small incisions of tunica albuginea at upper and lower pole (5mm), then extruded seminiferous tubules sampled
- can identify 99% of GCNIS

Placed in Bouin Solution (not formalin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Name some occasions where an immediate orchidectomy is not performed for a testicular tumour

A

1) In high volume metastatic disease (esp if life threatening), urgent upfront chemotherapy is needed. For example:
- respiratory compromise from extensive lung mets
- severe back pain from retroperitoneal disease
- extensive brain mets

2) Poor local tumour condition e.g. T4 disease with difficulty of orchidectomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Is orchidectomy still needed if a CA testis patient received upfront chemo (e.g. high metastatic load)

A

Yes, a later orchidectomy after chemo due to:
- poor penetration of chemotherapy through the blood-testis barrier
- would still be ~30% microscopic tumour in testis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Patient had inguinal orchidectomy and this is the specimen. What is the likely histological diagnosis?

A

Seminoma

Large cells with:
- clear cytoplasm
- densely staining nuclei “fried egg appearance” with nucleoli of varying sizes
- lymphocytic infiltrates also characteristic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What information would you look for in the pathology report of a radical orchidectomy specimen? (Viva book Q)

A

Based on the EAU guideline 2023 5.5:
➔ pathological examination and reporting should follow ISUP

Viva Book Answer:
1) Histological type of tumour
- germ cell (seminoma or non-seminomatous) or non-germ cell

2) T staging
- T1: limited to testis / epididymis, with no vascular or lymphatic invasion, may involve TA
- T2: vascular or lymphatic invasion, extends to involve TV
- T3: invades spermatic cord (with or without vascular or lymphatic involvement)
- T4: Invades scrotum (with or without vascular or lymphatic invasion)

3) Any GCNIS

4) Seminoma (stage 1) prognostic risk factors for relapse:
- tumour size > 4cm
- invasion of rete testis

5) NSGCT (stage 1) prognostic factors for relapse (Freedman in Lancet):
- vascular or lymphatic invasion
- absence of yolk sac elements
- presence of undifferentiated tumour

6) NSGCT prognostic factors for metastatic disease:
- vasular or lymphatic invasion
- % embryonal carcinoma >50% (predicts vascular invasion)
- Proliferation rate by MIB-1 immunostaining >70%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What staging for testicular cancer do you know? Briefly explain

A

➔ The AJCC staging system is most commonly used. Other staging systems include the Royal Marsden system, or the Boden-Gibbs classification

1) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM + S staging
- T1 = testis/epididymis, without vascular / lymphatic, may involve TA
- T2 = testis/epididymis, with vascular / lymphatic; or involves TV
- T3 = spermatic cord
- T4 = scrotum
- N1 = LNs ≤2cm
- N2 = >2-5cm
- N3 = >5cm
- M1a = non-regional LN or lung met
- M1b = other sites
- S0 = normal serum markers
- S1 = (AFP BhCG LDH = <1000 / <5000 / <1.5 xULN)
- S2 = 1000-10000 / 5000-50000 / 1.5-10 xULN
- S3 = >10000 / >50000 / >10x ULN

Stage IA = pT1 only (N0M0S0)
Stage IB = pT2-4 only (N0M0S0)
Stage IS = N0M0 but S1-3

Stage II = N+ with S0-1 only
- IIA = N1
- IIB = N2
- IIC = N3

Stage III = M+, or N+ with S2-3

2) Royal Marsden System
- Stage I = confined to testis
- Stage II = retroperitoneal LNs (A<2cm, B=2-5, C=5-10, D>10)
- Stage III = supra or infra-diaphragmatic LNs
- Stage IV = disseminated disease (liver / lung / bone)

3) Boden-Gibbs
- A = confined to testis
- B = Regional LN mets
- C = Supra-diaphragmatic or extra-lymphatic mets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What are some seminoma prognosis factors?

A

For seminoma

A. IGCCCG risk group for survival prognosis
1) Good prognosis = 5y OS 95%, PFS 89%
- no non-pulmonary visceral mets
- AND any primary site
- AND normal AFP, any B-hCG, any LDH
2) Intermediate prognosis = 5y OS 88%, PFS 79%
- Presence of non-pulmonary visceral met
3) No poor prognosis for seminoma

B. Prognostic risk factors for relapse in stage I seminoma:
(Aparicio Spanish GCCG)
- tumour size > 4cm
- invasion of rete testis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What are some NSGCT prognosis factors?

A

For NSGCT:

A. IGCCCG risk group for survival prognosis
1) Good prognosis = 5y OS 96%, PFS 90%
- Testis or retroperitoneal primary
- AND no non-pulmonary met
- AND S0 or S1 (i.e. AFP BhCG LDH = <1000 / <5000 / <1.5 xULN)
2) Intermediate = 5y OS 89%, PFS 78%
- Testis or retroperitoneal primary
- AND no non-pulmonary met
- AND S2
3) Poor = 5y OS 67%, PFS 54%
- Mediastinal primary
- or Presence of non-pulmonary visceral met
- or S3 (i.e. >10000, >50000, >10xULN)

B. NSGCT prognostic factors for metastatic disease:
- vasular or lymphatic invasion
- % embryonal carcinoma >50% (predicts vascular invasion)
- Proliferation rate by MIB-1 immunostaining >70%

C. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage 1 NSGCT
(Freedman in Lancet):
- vascular or lymphatic invasion
- absence of yolk sac elements
- presence of undifferentiated tumour

=> EAU 2023: Lympho-vascular invasion is the strongest and most reproducible predictive factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Tell me about IGCCCG risk groups

A

International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group

For Seminoma:
1) Good prognosis = 5y OS 95%, PFS 89%
- no non-pulmonary visceral mets
- AND any primary site
- AND normal AFP, any B-hCG, any LDH
2) Intermediate prognosis = 5y OS 88%, PFS 79%
- Presence of non-pulmonary visceral met
3) No poor prognosis for seminoma

For NSGCT:
1) Good prognosis = 5y OS 96%, PFS 90%
- Testis or retroperitoneal primary
- AND no non-pulmonary met
- AND S0 or S1 (i.e. AFP BhCG LDH = <1000 / <5000 / <1.5 xULN)
2) Intermediate = 5y OS 89%, PFS 78%
- Testis or retroperitoneal primary
- AND no non-pulmonary met
- AND S2
3) Poor = 5y OS 67%, PFS 54%
- Mediastinal primary
- or Presence of non-pulmonary visceral met
- or S3 (i.e. >10000, >50000, >10xULN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What are the indications for partial orchidectomy for CA testis?

Any contraindication?

A

AKA “Testis-sparing surgery”, may be able to prevent hypogonadism and infertility in young men

Based on EAU 2023 guideline, indication includes:
1) synchronous bilateral tumours
2) tumours in solitary testis
+) May be offered if small or indeterminate testicular masses, negative tumour markers and a normal contralateral testis to prevent over-treatment

Contraindication:
(Based on Henry’s notes): Tumour volume > 30% testicular volume

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

How would you perform a partial orchidectomy for suspected CA testis?

A
  • Inguinal incision
  • Spermatic cord and testis retracted to inguinal wound
  • Spermatic cord occluded with a non-crushing vascular clamp and the testis is cooled with ice for 10min
  • Tumour localised by palpation or intra-op USG
  • Excision with 2 to 5mm margin by blunt dissection or bipolar
    ➔ ** Send For frozen section ***
  • EAU 2024: at least two additional testicular biopsies should be taken to exclude GCNIS (e.g. random biopsy of adjacent testicular parenchyma)
  • Closure of TA with 4-O Vicryl
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Management of scrotal violation for CA testis

A

May occur if T4 disease, trans-scrotal orchidectomy or biopsy
Increases local recurrence risk (2.5%)

Optimal treatment is unclear. AUA 2019 guideline suggested “adjunctive therapy may rarely be considered for local control due to 2.5% local recurrence risk”, including:

1) Hemiscrotectomy or excision of trans-scrotal scar

2) If seminoma ➔ Radiotherapy with modified field to include ipsilateral iliac and inguinal LNs, and ipsilateral scrotum

3) Chemotherapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Give a brief overview of treatment of different stages of Seminoma after inguinal orchidectomy

A

1) IA and IB

i) Surveillance is preferred

ii) Alternative: Adjuvant chemo i.e. Carboplatin x 1-2

iii) If not suitable for surveillance and chemo: Can consider adjuvant RT to retroperitoneum

2) IS

i) monitor serum tumour markers and CT T+A+P to determine location of recurrence

3) IIA and IIB
i) Chemo is preferred: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4 if cannot B)

ii) Alternative: RT as follows:

- IIA: 2Gy x 15 dog-leg field

- IIB: Above + boost to enlarged LN 2 Gy x 3

4) IIC or III
i) Chemo depending on IGCCCG risk:
- Good: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4 if cannot B)
- Intermediate: BEP x 4 (or PEI x 4 if cannot B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Give a brief overview of treatment of different stages of NSGCT after inguinal orchidectomy

A

1) Stage I ➔ Surveillance for all patients

OR

1) Stage I ➔ Risk adapted Treatment:

1A) Low risk (i.e. Stage IA, without LVI)
i) Standard = surveillance
ii) If refuse surveillance = chemo BEP x 1
iii) RPLND is less preferred due to lower 2-year RFS than chemo, only if refuses AS and chemo

1B) High risk (i.e. Stage IB, or with LVI)
i) Chemo: BEP x 1 preferred over BEP x 2
ii) Surveillance or RPLND is less preferred, only if refuses chemo

3) Stage IIA IIB with S0
 ➔ need to clarify stage by either surveillance or RPLND
i) Surveillance: repeat CT and tumour markers at 6/52:
- if S0, regression ➔ observe
- if S0, no change or PD ➔ NS-RPLND
- if S+, treat as stage III with chemo based on prognosis group, +/- resection of residual tumour
ii) or primary NS-RPLND
- if pathological stage I: follow-up
- if pathological stage IIA/B: follow-up or BEP x 2

4) Stage IIA IIB with S1 / IIC / III
i) Chemo depending on IGCCCG risk:
- Good prognosis: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4)
- Intermediate prog: BEP x 4
- poor prognosis: BEP x 4 (or PEI x 4) by 1 cycle first followed by tumour markers in 3 weeks to see if dose intensification is needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Management of stage I Seminoma

What is the rationale?

A


i) Surveillance is preferred

ii) Alternative: Adjuvant chemo i.e. Carboplatin x 1-2

iii) If not suitable for surveillance and chemo: Can consider adjuvant RT to retroperitoneum

Rationale for Surveillance:
1) Relapse risk is not high
- based on Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto series: 15%
2) CSS >97% with surveillance in PMH series
3) Even if relapse, salvage chemo or RT is effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What is the risk of relapse in stage I seminoma? What are the risk factors?

A

Overall risk of relapse = 15% based on Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto series

Aparicio Spanish SGCCG showed recurrence depends on risk factors:
1) Tumour size >4cm
2) Rete testis invasion
- 6% if no risk factor
- 16% if 1 risk factor
- 32% if 2 risk factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Should stage 1 seminoma use a risk adapted approach?

A

No, surveillance is preferred due to:
Rationale for Surveillance:
1) Relapse risk is not high
- based on Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto series: 15%
2) CSS >97% with surveillance in PMH series
3) Even if relapse, salvage chemo or RT is effective

Risk adapted approach is not suggested because despite systematic reviews showing risk factors (>4cm, rete testis) predict relapse, the quality and level of evidence is low, therefore should not be used to guide treatment choice (EAU)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is the surveillance protocol for stage I seminoma?

A

1) History and P/E
2) Hormonal profile annually, with tumour markers and CXR
3) Intensive CT T+A+P imaging
- Q6m in first 3 years
- 1-2 yearly up to 9th year

41
Q

Why is intensive CT imaging crucial for stage I seminoma surveillance?

A
  • 87% relapse detected by CT scan
  • only 3% relapse detected by beta-HCG
42
Q

Compare adjuvant chemo vs RT in stage I seminoma. Which one is better?

A

(Surveillance is preferred; chemo or RT should only be considered if patient declines surveillance)

Adjuvant Chemo is preferred as second line over RT because:
1) MRC TE 19 and EORTC compared Carboplatin x 1 vs RT, showing no statistically significant difference in
- recurrence rate
- time to recurrence
- survival; with
2) Reduction of contralateral GCT with carboplatin
3) RT has high risk of secondary malignancy and therefore is not preferred
4) Chemo is easy to administer, also has shorter time to deliver adjuvant therapy
5) Less lethargic, and less likely to take time off work when compared to RT

43
Q

What adjuvant chemotherapy for stage 1 seminoma? What is the efficacy?

A

(Surveillance is preferred; chemo or RT should only be considered if patient declines surveillance)

Carboplatin x 1-2 doses (less toxicity than cisplatin)
➔ 1 course reduces risk of relapse to 3%
➔ 2 course reduces risk of relapse to 1% (for patients with both risk factors)

44
Q

What is the role of adjuvant RT in stage I seminoma?

A

NOT recommended because of risk of secondary malignancy, despite seminoma being very radiosensitive

It is only considered if patients is not suitable for surveillance and contraindicated to chemotherapy (carboplatin)

45
Q

Extent of radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma. Explain

A

(RT is not recommended, and is only considered if patients is not suitable for surveillance and contraindicated to chemotherapy)

Extent
20-24Gy Para-aortic fields in patients with undisturbed LN drainage, due to:
1) MRC TE 10 showed comparable results to classical dog-leg field
2) Reduce acute toxicity in 18 month
3) Better sperm count in 18 month
-) However higher relapse rate in iliac LN
➔ if lymphatic drainage is disturbed then traditional 30Gy dog-leg field

46
Q

Dosage of radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma. Explain

A

(RT is not recommended, and is only considered if patients is not suitable for surveillance and contraindicated to chemotherapy)

Dosage
20-24Gy Para-aortic fields in patient, due to:
1) MRC TE 18 showed non-inferior recurrence rate with 20Gy vs 30Gy
2) With reduced acute toxicity in 20Gy (e.g. lethargy 5% vs 20% at 4 weeks)
3) Faster return to work

47
Q

What’s the efficacy of adjuvant RT for stage I seminoma?

A

(RT is not recommended, and is only considered if patients is not suitable for surveillance and contraindicated to chemotherapy)

Reduces relapse rate to 1-3% (similar to chemo, carbo x 1 ➔ 3%, carbo x 2 ➔ 1%)

48
Q

What is “dog leg” field? What are the boundaries?

A

RT to:
1) Para-aortic fields, and
2) Ipsilateral iliac node

Upper: T11
Lower: L5
Lateral: renal hilum
Medial: lumbar spine transverse process

49
Q

Risk of RT for seminoma

A

1) Radiation scatter with subfertility and azoospermia
2) 8% persistent oligospermia
3) Secondary non-germ cell malignancy, with persistent elevated risk at least 15 years
- thyroid cancer
- pancreatic cancer
- bladder cancer
- haematological malignancy
- Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
4) Moderate long term GU / GI side effects
5) Cardiovascular side effects

50
Q

Management for stage IIA and IIB seminoma

A

IIA = N1 (LN<2cm)
IIB = N2 (LN 2-5cm)
IIC = N3 (LN>5cm) ➔ same Tx as stage III

For IIA (LN <2cm)
i) If normal markers, observe for 6-8 weeks with repeat-staging imaging as these may be non-metastatic, only initiate Tx if unequivocal based on biopsy, increasing nodal size/number, or subsequent marker rise
ii) Chemo is preferred: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4 if cannot B)
iii) Alternative: 30Gy RT 2Gy x 15 dog-leg field


For IIB (LN 2-5cm)
i) Chemo is preferred: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4 if cannot B)
ii) Alternative: 36Gy RT
- 2Gy x 15 dog-leg field + boost to enlarged LN 2Gy x 3

Chemo is preferred based on Giannatempo

51
Q

Which adjuvant Tx is more preferred in stage IIA/B seminoma? Why?

A

Chemo (BEP x 3) is preferred over RT (30Gy or 36Gy dog leg field +/- boost)

1) Giannatempo meta-analysis
- similar efficacy
- non-significant greater efficacy for chemotherapy in stage IIB seminoma
2) Toxicity is more short term for chemo, whereas more long term for RT
3) Concerns with long term effects of radiotherapy and second malignancy.

Radiation therapy stands as an equal option therapy, although best suited for patients who are elderly, have contraindications or difficulties tolerating systemic chemotherapy.

(EAU 2023)

52
Q

What is the chemotherapy regimen for IIA/B seminoma? Explain their side effects

A

BEP x 3 (or EP x 4 if contraindicated for B)

1) Bleomycin
- pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis
- thromboembolism
- Raynaud’s phenomenon
- GI disturbance

2) Etoposide
- Myelotoxicity, neutropenic fever
- Secondary leukemia
- Alopecia
- GI disturbance

3) Cisplatin
- ototoxic
- nephrotoxic
- peripheral neuropathy
- myelotoxicity
- GI disturbance

53
Q

Contraindication for Bleomycin

A

1) High lung met burden
2) Smoker
3) >40 yo
4) Underlying poor respiratory function

54
Q

Management of Stage IIC / III seminoma

A

Depends on IGCCCG prognosis group (any extra-pulmonary met):

i) Good risk ➔ BEP x 3 (or EP x 4 if cannot B)

ii) Intermediate risk ➔ BEP x 4 (or PEI x 4 if cannot B)

55
Q

How is BEP administered?

A

Bleomycin + Etoposide + Cisplatin

Administered:
- in-patient
- via central line
- 3 to 4L hydration over 24 hours with osmotic diuresis
- antibiotics cover (reduces neutropenic fever)
- anti-emetics
- no need delay if neutropenia without fever
- delay cycle for 3 days if neutropenic fever

56
Q

What is the nature of residual mass after first line chemo for seminoma?

A

Residual tumour in Seminoma:
70% necrotic-fibrotic tissue
20% seminoma (residual)
10% teratoma

(cf. 50% teratoma / 40% necrotic / 10% viable tumour in NSGCT)

57
Q

Management of residual mass after first line chemo for seminoma

A

MDT Discussion

1) Check beta-HCG
➔ if persistently elevated, then for immediate salvage chemo (PEI x 4)

2) If beta-HCG -ve, then depends on size and delineate any viable tumour:

3) Size >3cm
- up to 38% viable residual tumour
- perform FDG PET-CT x 8/52 after chemo
- if +ve then salvage chemo

4) Size <3cm
- 0-4% viable residual tumour
- perform FDG PET-CT x 8/52 after chemo
- if PET-CT static disease, can consider Bx or FU PET-CT in 6 weeks again
- if PET-CT progressive disease, then salvage chemo

58
Q

Efficacy and timing of FDG PET-CT for seminoma

A

Sensitivity 80%
Specificity 100%

Timing: at least 8 weeks after chemotherapy to avoid false positive

59
Q

What is the role of surgery for residual seminoma after first line chemo? Why?

A

Residual mass should not be resected primarily irrespective of size (EAU)

1) Technically difficult surgery and not feasible due to post-chemo desmoplastic reaction
2) Teratoma and malignant transformation is less of a concern in advanced seminoma

60
Q

Patient is on surveillance after treatment for seminoma. Latest CT noted disease recurrence, what the is the management?

A

Discuss in MDT
Depends on prior chemo status & treatment

1) Chemo naive depends on Tx
i) primary chemo (BEP x 3), up to 100% cure rate
- if systemic recurrence
- if previous RT
- if RT naive, but >3cm retroperitoneal

ii) dog leg field RT, up to 90% cure rate
- if RT naive but <3cm retroperitoneal relapse

2) Post-chemo relapse depends on time
i) Early (<2 years)
➔ Biopsy if tumour marker negative, to rule out teratoma
➔ salvage chemo if indeed CA testis relapse (PEI x 4)

ii) Late (>2 years)
➔ Primary chemo (BEP x 3)

61
Q

How to treat stage I NSGCT?

A

Risk adapted Treatment:


1A) Low risk (i.e. Stage IA, without LVI)
i) Standard = surveillance
ii) If refuse surveillance = chemo BEP x 1
iii) RPLND is less preferred due to lower 2-year RFS than chemo, only if refuses AS and chemo

1B) High risk (i.e. Stage IB, or with LVI)
i) Chemo: BEP x 1 preferred over BEP x 2
ii) Surveillance or RPLND is less preferred, only if refuses chemo

Alterantive: Surveillance for all stage I

Except Primary RPLND in stage 1 teratoma with somatic malignant component

62
Q

What is the risk of relapse for stage I NSGCT?

Where does the relapse occur?

A

Overall around 30% at 5 years based on Denmark group study (Daugaard JCO 2014), with 80% occurring within 1st year after orchidectomy

Relapse are located:
- 60% in retroperitoneum
- 30% in lung
- 10% marker only

63
Q

What are the risk factors for relapse or prognosis of NSGCT?

A

Freedman for relapse
1) Vascular invasion
- 50% if present vs 15% if absent
2) Lymphatic invasion
3) Absence of yolk sac element
4) Presence of undifferentiated tumour

Risk factors for prognosis:
1) Vascular invasion of primary tumour or lymphatic vessels
2) Proliferation rate by MIB-1 immunostaining >70%
3) Embryonal carcinoma >50%

64
Q

What’s the evidence supporting surveillance for stage 1 NSGCT?

A

Daugaard JCO 2014, published by Denmark group

All stage I patients including high risk for surveillance
- 30% relapse at 5 years, with 80% relapse occurring within first year after orchidectomy
- good prognosis even with relapse, with CSS 99% at 15 years

65
Q

What is the FU schedule for surveillance for stage 1 NSGCT?

A
  • History and physical exams
  • regular tumour markers Q3 months
  • CT at 0, 3, 12 months

➔ 80% relapse occurring within first year after orchidectomy (Daugaard, Denmark study)

66
Q

What’s the efficacy and evidence for chemo for stage 1 NSGCT?

What chemo to give?

A
  • Low risk: can consider chemo if refuses surveillance
  • High risk: chemo

Give BEP x 1

Evidence:
1) Based on SWENOTECA 2009 Study ➔ Reduce relapse rate from 50% to 3.2%
2) Superior to RPLND based on German Testicular Cancer Study Group AUO trial ➔ 2 year RFS 99% vs 92%

67
Q

BEP x 1 or BEP x 2 for stage 1 NSGCT?

A

BEP x 1 because it has a better risk-benefit ratio

SWENOTECA (JCO 2009)
➔ Reduce relapse rate from 50% to 3.2% for BEP x 1
➔ down to 2.7% for BEP x 2

68
Q

What is the role of RPLND for stage I NSGCT?

A

Not a standard treatment, because:

1) Less efficacious than chemo
- German Testicular Cancer Study Group AUO trial ➔ 2 year RFS 99% vs 92%

2) Still high rate of subsequent chemotherapy i.e. if pathological stage 2 disease, still need BEP

3) Still high relapse rate
- because only 60% are retroperitoneal relapse, with 30% lung

69
Q

In what situation should we perform RPLND for stage 1 NSGCT?

A

1) Only if patient refuses surveillance or chemotherapy (BEP x 1)

2) Teratoma with somatic malignantt component
- due to higher risk of nodal metastasis

70
Q

How to manage stage IIA / IIB NSGCT?

A

Depends on tumour markers

1) If S0
 ➔ need to clarify stage thus consider surveillance of primary NS-RPLND
i) Surveillance: repeat CT and tumour markers at 6/52:
- if S0, CT regression ➔ observe
- if S0, CT no change or PD ➔ NS-RPLND
- if S+, treat as stage III with chemo based on prognosis group, +/- resection of residual tumour

ii) or primary NS-RPLND
- if pathological stage I: follow-up
- if pathological stage IIA/B: follow-up or BEP x 2

2) if S1 then same as IIC or III:
i) Chemo depending on IGCCCG risk:
- Good prognosis: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4)
- Intermediate prog: BEP x 4
- poor prognosis: BEP x 4 (or PEI x 4) by 1 cycle first followed by tumour markers in 3 weeks to see if dose intensification is needed

71
Q

What are the possibilities for Stage IIA/B NSGCT with S0

A

1) N0 disease (20%)
2) Teratoma
3) Undifferentiated tumour

➔ Need to clarify stage by either surveillance or primary RPLND

72
Q

Pros and Cons of RPLND for stage IIA/B NSGCT with S0

A

Can be considered directly (primary RPLND) or surveillance with static or progressive disease on CT

Pros and Cons:
+) 20% are pN0, thus sparing chemo
+) 30% retroperitoneal teratoma are chemo-resistant
+) Long term CSS = 98-100%
+) Can avoid chemo in up to 50%

-) Additional therapy required in 50% of patients
-) 15% have persistent disease and require full adjuvant chemotherapy
-) Side effects
-) Technically demanding

73
Q

Management of Stage IIA/B NSGCT with S+

A

Same as IIC or stage III disease:

Chemo depending on IGCCCG risk:
- Good prognosis: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4)
- Intermediate prog: BEP x 4
- Poor prognosis: BEP x 4 (or PEI x 4) by 1 cycle first followed by tumour markers in 3 weeks to see if dose intensification is needed

If post-chemo residual tumour then resection

74
Q

Pros and Cons for chemo in stage IIA/B NSGCT

A

Reserved for S+ cases:

Pros and Cons:
+) 60% complete response, sparing surgery
+) Easy to deliver treatment
+) CSS = 96-100%

-) Chemo toxicitiy
-) Post-chemo relapse would be chemo-resistant

75
Q

Management of stage IIC/III NSGCT

A

Chemo depending on IGCCCG risk:
1) Good prognosis: BEP x 3 (or EP x 4)
2) Intermediate prog: BEP x 4
3) Poor prognosis: BEP x 4 (or PEI x 4) by 1 cycle first followed by tumour markers in 3 weeks to see if dose intensification is needed based on GETUG 13

76
Q

Explain the chemo regimen for poor prognosis group NSGCT (stage II-III)

A

BEP x 4 (or PEI x 4)
Based on GETUG-13 trial

  • give BEP x 1 first
  • then recheck AFP and Beta-HCG in 3 weeks
    ➔ if favourable decline, then give BEP x 3 more doses
    ➔ if unfavourable decline, then for intensification with dose-dense chemo (Paclitaxel before BEP + Oxaliplatin)

Dose-dense chemo improves PFS (not OS) in patients with early unfavourable marker decline

77
Q

When to consider PEI x 4 instead of BEP x 4 in poor prognosis NSGCT? What is the disadvantage?

A

Consider PEI if:
1) Compromised lung function
2) Likely need extensive chest surgery to remove residual disease after chemo

PEI is more myelotoxic than BEP

78
Q

Define these RPLND terms:
- Primary RPLND
- Secondary RPLND
- Salvage RPLND
- Desperation RPLND
- RPLND I
- RPLND II
- RPLND III

A

1) Primary RPLND
- RPLND after orchidectomy before chemo
- In Stage 1 (Less preferred due to lower RFS by German Testicular Cancer Study Group AUO trial) ➔ i.e. RPLND I
- In Stage 2A/B with S0 (alternative for surveillance) ➔ i.e. RPLND II

2) Secondary RPLND
- post chemo residual tumour
➔ i.e. RPLND III

3) Salvage RPLND
- tumour markers response after salvage chemo
- post-salvage chemo surgical resection

4) Desperation RPLND
- tumour markers elevation despite salvage chemo
- resection of non-responsive or progressive disease after salvage chemo

79
Q

Testicular cancer LN drainage

A

Depends on right or left cancer

Right side:
1) 1st landing zone = inter-aortocaval LN
2) then pre-caval and pre-aortic LN
3) then right common iliac + external iliac

Left side:
1) 1st landing zone = para-aortic and pre-aortic LN
2) Then inter-aortocaval LN
3) Then left common iliac + external iliac

80
Q

Templates for RPLND in CA testis

A

1) RPLND I (for stage I)
Right side
- superior: renal pedicle
- right: lateral aspect of right ureter down to common iliac crossing
- left: medial border of left ureter down to level of IMA
- posterior: anterior spinous ligament

Left side:
- superior: renal pedicle
- left: lateral aspect of left ureter down to common iliac crossing
- right: lateral border of IVC down to level of IMA including inter-aortocaval LN
- posterior: anterior spinous ligament

2) RPLND II (for stage II)
Bilateral dissection of retroperitoneum, extend below IMA and above renal artery
- superior: renal pedicle
- inferior: aortic bifurcation to iliac crossings
- lateral: bilateral ureters
- posterior: anterior spinous ligament

2) RPLND III (i.e. secondary RPLND)
- superior: crus of diaphragm
- inferior: common iliac bifurcation
- lateral: bilateral ureters
- posterior: anterior spinous ligament

81
Q

Explain difference in extend for RPLND I in left versus right testicular tumour

A

Chance of crossovers from right to left, but not vice versa. Hence, for right sided tumor, LND extended to left ureter

Right side
- superior: renal pedicle
- right: lateral aspect of right ureter down to common iliac crossing
- left: medial border of left ureter down to level of IMA
- posterior: anterior spinous ligament

Left side:
- superior: renal pedicle
- left: lateral aspect of left ureter down to common iliac crossing
- right: lateral border of IVC down to level of IMA including inter-aortocaval LN
- posterior: anterior spinous ligament

82
Q

Steps in RPLND

A
  • midline incision
  • mobilise ascending and descending colon
  • +/- ligation of IMA
  • kocherise duodenum
  • split and roll
  • template depends
83
Q

Complications of RPLND in CA testis

A

1) Damage to lymphatics
- chylous ascites 2%

2) Damage to sympathetic system
- anejaculation 7%
- up to 70-80% if standard template

3) Damage to vessels
- 8% may require vascular graft repair
- AKI
- spinal cord ischemia

4) Damage to organs
- bowel injury
- pancreatitis 1%

5) Nephrectomy 20%
- due to injury to vessel or upper ureter

6) ileus
7) VTE
8) Recurrence 10%

84
Q

What is spared in nerve sparing RPLND?

A
  • paravertebral sympathetic chains
  • post-ganglionic sympathetic fibres (T12-L4)
  • hypogastric plexus
85
Q

What is the nature of residual mass after first line chemo for NSGCT?

A

50% teratoma
40% necrotic-fibrotic tissue
10% viable carcinoma

(cf. Seminoma 70% necrotic / 20% seminoma / 10% teratoma)

86
Q

What is the typical presentation of residual teratoma?

A

1) Enlarging or new mass despite appropriate chemo
2) Normalisation of serum tumour markers
3) Resection specimen showing mature teratoma

➔ i.e. “Growing teratoma Syndrome”, with risk of malignant transformation

87
Q

What is the role of PET-CT in residual testicular cancer?

A

FDG PET-CT is useful for assessment of residual seminoma

For residual tumour size >3cm after seminoma treatment:
- up to 38% viable residual tumour
- perform FDG PET-CT x 8/52 after chemo
- if +ve then salvage chemo

No role for NSGCT due to low uptake by teratoma
- Oechsle 2018: predictive accuracy for post chemo residual mass in NSGCT is similar between CT, PET-CT, and tumour markers

88
Q

Management of residual tumour after chemo for NSGCT

A

Discuss in MDT
Mainly for secondary RPLND to see if salvage chemo is needed
No role of PET CT

1) If <1cm: consider surveillance or secondary RPLND

2) For secondary RPLND within 6-8 weeks if:
- >1cm with normalising or plateauing tumour markers
- <1cm with primary orchidectomy specimen showing mature teratoma

3) Continue surveillance if pathology returned mature teratoma or necrosis (due to low relapse rate ~10%)

4) If viable tumour or immature teratoma ➔ then for adjuvant salvage chemotherapy

89
Q

Approach to multiple residual masses after chemo for NSGCT

A

Resection of all sites of measurable residual disease

Consider RPLND first as presence of necrosis in RPLND specimen is highly predictive of necrosis at other sites

90
Q

How to manage NSGCT relapse?

A

Discuss in MDT
Depends on chemo status and timing

A. Chemo-naive
1) RPLND If <3cm retroperitoneal disease with normal tumour markers ➔ as likely teratoma
2) Otherwise (or Hx of RPLND done already) proceed with primary chemo as per IGCCCG prognosis group

B. Post-chemo early
1) If early (<2 years)
- Salvage chemo and see response e.g. PEI x 4
- If tumour marker response but residual mass ➔ salvage RPLND
- If rising tumour marker ➔ desperation RPLND

2) If late (>2y)
- Biopsy to confirm diagnosis first
- Surgical resection if resectable
- Salvage chemo if not resectable +/- secondary surgery if responsive

91
Q

Nature of late post-chemo relapse in NSGCT

A

I.e. more than 2 years

70% viable tumour, usually yolk sac
20% teratoma
10% malignant transformation (adenoCA most common)

Usually resistant to chemotherapy

—> Therefore if Post-chemo late (>2y)
1) Biopsy to confirm diagnosis first
2) Surgical resection if resectable
3) Salvage chemo if not resectable +/- secondary surgery if responsive

92
Q

Inguinal orchidectomy specimen returned to be Sertoli cell tumour / Leydig cell tumour. What is the next step?

A
  • Organ-sparing procedure recommended if diagnosis is known
  • Retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy should be performed to prevent metastasis
  • Once metastasized, respond poorly to chemotherapy or radiation ➔ Poor survival
93
Q

What is GCNIS?

A

It is a pre-invasive testicular germ cell lesion. It is the precursor for all germ cell tumours except:

  • spermatocytic seminoma
  • teratoma
  • yolk sac tumour
94
Q

What is the natural history of GCNIS?

A

Maase BMJ 1986 classical paper:
- if untreated GCNIS then 50% progression to germ cell tumour in 5 years (70% in 7 years)

95
Q

How to treat GCNIS? What does it depend on?

A

Depends on:
1) Fertility wish
2) Presence of absence of normal contralateral testis
3) Any concurrent CA testis and treatment plan

=================
In cases with concurrent CA test (i.e. one side already removed)
1) If no need chemo for GCT
- if fertility wish ➔ active surveillance
- if no fertility wish ➔ RT
2) If need chemo for GCT
- should eradicate 2/3 of GCNIS
- repeat Bx 2 years after chemo ➔ if positive then orchidectomy or RT

In cases without GCT (normal contralateral testis)
1) Orchidectomy preferred over irradiation (due to potential damage of contralateral normal testis by scattered radiation)

96
Q

What is the treatment of choice for GCNIS?

A

Based on retrospective study by German Testicular Cancer Study Group:

➔ Local RT 20Gy remains standard for GCNIS, with malignant event down to 2.5%, but with 30% chance of hypogonadism

97
Q

Definition of testicular microlithiasis

A

At least 5 micro-calcifications <2mm in one single cut, without distortion of testicular contour

➔ due to calcified sloughed degenerated intratubular cells

98
Q

Clinical significance of testicular microlithiasis

A

Not associated with increased risk of CA testis, unless risk factors present

1) DeCastro Study
- found in 5% of asymptomatic man
- 98% did not develop CA testis
- therefore surveillance is not cost-effective, and for regular self examination

2) Tan meta-analysis:
- risk of CA testis increased up to 8.5% if presence of CA testis risk factors