2. Core knowledge Flashcards

1
Q

Who came up with core knowledge

A

Spelke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is core knowledge

A

modularity nativism, small number of innate specialized mechanisms underlie cog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Candidates for core knowledge

A

object cognotion (solidity/continuity)
number (approximayte quantity/ratio)
agents and intention
social group affiliation (preference for lang)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Module features

A

elemental, early emerge, universal, coherence across tasks, similar in animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Geometric computation module

A

Rats use geo to orient, not landmarks!
So do infants!
NOT bc can’t remember landmarks/boring
evolutionarily old module used (in rats!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

TWO different geo systems

A

Mature geo integrates two systems
Distance and Direction
Form and Angle
Corr. within

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Abstract knowledge

A

abstract over patterns, generlizations
Headturn pref. procedure - look at light = hear stimulus, look away, stop stim, see looking time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Syllable Abstraction

A

Infants prefer stimuli with a new rule
shows learned a rule!
Gerken study on how know what to pay attention to
If hear AA”DI”, cant abstract to AAB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Infants probability

A

Look longer at more improbable events (ball bouncing occluder)
Understand likelihoods and correspond to actual likelihoods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Do infants think it’s them or the world

A

Gweon Schulz study with faulty toy
if one lone experiment fails 50%, infants choose another toy
if two experiments both fairly 50%, choose another toy
if two experiments, one 100%, other 0%, hand toy to MOM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Causal analysis

A

Blickets Gopnik study
Understand causal analysis of blicket detector IS NOT simple association due to same chance of noise but diff scenarios diff conclusions
NOT blocking because backward blocking gave diff results,
USE BASE RATES, if blickets rare, 4yos MORE LIKELY SAY GREEN ISN’T BLICKET
4YO USE BASE RATE NOT 3YO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Function computation

A

Can understand one function (one change)
but can’t do function of function
think of it as only the second function
f(g(x)) = f(x)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How direct attention

A

Towards medium complexity
too simple boring
too complex too much to glean a pattern from

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Learning from violation

A

Learn facts about objects that violated spelke conditions
PAID ATTENTION/LEARN from violators
not from non-violators
play more with violator
WANT TO INVESTIGATE SURPRISING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Consistency in exploration

A

If looked longer at surprising when 11 months
correlated with looking time at 17 months
NO CORRELATION for non-violators
correlated time for violators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Uncertainty in infants

A

Children know when they are uncertain
look to mom when can and are unsure about task

17
Q

Testing info hypothesis

A

Bayes Rule
p(a|b) = p(a) x p(b|a)
Good to idenitfy and create structure from data
Kemp/Tenenbaum said that we can create strcutural info constraints from general prob. inferences like bayes