2. Core knowledge Flashcards
Who came up with core knowledge
Spelke
What is core knowledge
modularity nativism, small number of innate specialized mechanisms underlie cog
Candidates for core knowledge
object cognotion (solidity/continuity)
number (approximayte quantity/ratio)
agents and intention
social group affiliation (preference for lang)
Module features
elemental, early emerge, universal, coherence across tasks, similar in animals
Geometric computation module
Rats use geo to orient, not landmarks!
So do infants!
NOT bc can’t remember landmarks/boring
evolutionarily old module used (in rats!)
TWO different geo systems
Mature geo integrates two systems
Distance and Direction
Form and Angle
Corr. within
Abstract knowledge
abstract over patterns, generlizations
Headturn pref. procedure - look at light = hear stimulus, look away, stop stim, see looking time
Syllable Abstraction
Infants prefer stimuli with a new rule
shows learned a rule!
Gerken study on how know what to pay attention to
If hear AA”DI”, cant abstract to AAB
Infants probability
Look longer at more improbable events (ball bouncing occluder)
Understand likelihoods and correspond to actual likelihoods
Do infants think it’s them or the world
Gweon Schulz study with faulty toy
if one lone experiment fails 50%, infants choose another toy
if two experiments both fairly 50%, choose another toy
if two experiments, one 100%, other 0%, hand toy to MOM
Causal analysis
Blickets Gopnik study
Understand causal analysis of blicket detector IS NOT simple association due to same chance of noise but diff scenarios diff conclusions
NOT blocking because backward blocking gave diff results,
USE BASE RATES, if blickets rare, 4yos MORE LIKELY SAY GREEN ISN’T BLICKET
4YO USE BASE RATE NOT 3YO
Function computation
Can understand one function (one change)
but can’t do function of function
think of it as only the second function
f(g(x)) = f(x)
How direct attention
Towards medium complexity
too simple boring
too complex too much to glean a pattern from
Learning from violation
Learn facts about objects that violated spelke conditions
PAID ATTENTION/LEARN from violators
not from non-violators
play more with violator
WANT TO INVESTIGATE SURPRISING
Consistency in exploration
If looked longer at surprising when 11 months
correlated with looking time at 17 months
NO CORRELATION for non-violators
correlated time for violators