3) Revocation + Revival Flashcards

1
Q

revocation: def

A

testator does something to invalidate a will

revocation must not be result of fraud, undue influence, or mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

revocation: ways

A

1) subsequent testamentary instrument
2) physical act
3) marriage dissolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

revocation: subsequent will: kinds

A

1) expressly revokes

2) impliedly revokes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

revocation: subsequent will: expressly revokes: def

A

states that revokes.

*new will must meet validity requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

revocation: subsequent will: impliedly revokes: def

A

not specifically revoking the previous will, but makes a new dispositive scheme or distributes 100% of the estate (ex. through a residuary clause)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

revocation: codicil?

A

MODIFIES, not replaces, unless:

  • -express langauge of revocation
  • -inconsistencies (reconcile as much as possible)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

subsequent will: date requried?

A

no, but if multiple, inconsistent wills, none can be probated if can’t prove which is later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

revocation by physical act: ways

A

1) burning
2) tearing
3) cancelling
4) obliterating or
5) destryoign the will

WITH THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF REVOKING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

revocation: by physical act: who

A

tetator must do it himself or, another person in his presence + by his direction (need 2 wits for that)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

revocation by physical act: cancelling: def

A

must deface words or signature +

intent to revoke +

must touch material provisions – can’t just write “void” inthe margin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

revocation by physical act: partial revocation: def

A

made by crossing out or drawing lines through particular clauses in will

result: interpretation – what was testator’s intent?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

revocation: copies

A

unexecuted copies – no legal effect

if multiple executed originals, revoking 1 is presumed to revoke all (but can rebut presumption if testator knew of another copy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

codicils: effect of physical revocation

A

usu physically revoking will also revokes the codicil

exception: if testator intended for codicil to stand on its own, then will NOT revoke the codicil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

lost wills

A

presumption that testator destroyed the will by physical act

rebuttable by presumption of extrinsic evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

revocation: marital dissolution

A

under probate code, implied revocation of any disposition or apopintment of property made to testator’s FORMER spouse, if the marriage is subsequently dissolved or annulled

treat like they predeceased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

revival: rule/ways

A

revoked will cannot be revived, unless

1) reexecution of will (w proper formalities) or
2) republication: execution of another will or codicil that incorporates the revoked will by reference

17
Q

multiple revocations

A

if 2nd will that revoked an earlier will is itself revoked, then 1st will remains revoked

UNLESS evidence from circs of testator’s declarations that intended the first one to be revived

18
Q

revival / codicil

A

validly executed codicil can revive a previously revoked will

19
Q

revival after remarriage

A

if revoked by dissolution / annulment but you remarry the former spouse, will revive those provisions

20
Q

dependant relative revocation: scenario

A

partial revocation then writes somethign else on it. would they have intended partial revocation to count if they knew that what they wrote in wouldn’t count?

21
Q

dependent relative revocation: rule

A

testator evokes old will with intent to replace with new. But new is invalid or not executed. wills must be sufficiently consistent.

Result: the revoked will is revived, bc testator did not intend for revocation to occur unless new will could take effect