4 Service Innovation Flashcards

1
Q

Netflix: How was innovation created? What kind of innovation was it?

A

Combining elements which are already present (partly in different industries) as well as own existing assets (movies) were key -> “architectural innovation”

ICT – in particular, app and internet technology – enabled Netflix for quickly implementing and scaling its service -> “technology push”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Netflix: How were incumbents in the industry affected?

A
  • Low entry barrier in services to enter industry

- For incumbents it would have meant to cannibalize business -> „boiling frog/investor‘s dilemma“

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did Netflix engage third-party ideas?

A

Contest for recommendation draws external ideas -> „open innovation“

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Name 4 short definitions of innovations

A
  • New products or processes
  • New combination of need and means
  • Process of new technology application
  • Invention + exploitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give one sentence definitions of inventions, improvements and innovations

A

Invention
• Discovering or developing a new way to do something.

Improvement
• Making something incrementally faster, better or cheaper

Innovation
• Economic application of an invention or improvement that significantly changes the existing balance among competitors in a market, forcing other players to adapt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name 5 “facets” of possible innovation and an example for each

A

§ The introduction of a new good - i.e. one with which consumers are not yet familiar – or of a new quality of a good -> IPod

§ The introduction of a new method of production, which need by no means be founded upon a discovery scientifically new, and can also exist in a new way
of handling a commodity commercially. -> Ford assembly line, 3D printing

§ The opening of a new market, i.e. a market into which the particular branch of manufacture of the country in question has not previously entered, whether or not this market has existed before. -> Mercedes, Smart: Small cars

§ The conquest of a new source of supply of raw materials or half-manufactured goods, again irrespective of whether this source already exists or
whether it has first to be created. -> Skype

§ The carrying out of the new organization of any industry, like the creation of a monopoly position (for example through trustification) or the breaking up
of a monopoly position - > mail delivery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Challenges of service innovation

A
  • Often requires organizational change
  • Industrialization vs. individualization
  • Few options for patents
  • Hardly any objective quality measures
  • Innovation pull vs. push
  • Often no dedicated R&D unit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why may „Service Innovation“ be more

challenging to understand than goods innovation?

A
  • Service innovations are rarely R&D
  • > driven by practical experience.
  • organizational changes might be needed
    -> support from external stakeholders or even from a
    collaboration between a network of firms.
  • innovation activities are less structured than in manufacturing
  • employees are more involved in the innovation process.
  • Innovation theory is based on the analysis of technological innovation in manufacturing
  • > „fuzzy“ nature of service outputs makes them harder to understand and analyze.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is Measuring innovation success in services is a special challenge? Compare measures for manufacturing with their applicability to services

A

Counting Patents
->Services not patentable in most countries

Size of R&D Department, level of formal education, Share of revenue spent on R&D
-> Typically no formal R&D department

Share of revenue from new products
-> Share of revenue from new services

Time to market for new product
-> Time to market for new service

Survey Image/Reputation with customers
-> Survey Image/Reputation with customers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

draw the Henderson and Clark innovation Framework and give examples

A

see page 18

y: Linkage between core concepts and components
x: core concepts

Unchanged + reinforced: Incremental
-> counselling session with computer

Unchanged + overturned: Modular
-> ATM

Changed + reinforced: Architectural
-> Mobile payment

Changed + overturned: Radical
-> Online Banking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain architectural innovation shortly

A

Architectural innovation combines technological innovations already in place in new ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain architectural and radical innovation on the example of the digital camera

A

Architectural side: Existing components

  • Low-resolution TV camera sensor
  • Cassette tape to store picture (took 23 seconds)
  • TV for displaying picture

Radical side: Pictures and videos can be uploaded on social networks and platforms easily to share them, access them from everywhere,…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain architectural innovation on the example of Mercedes Boost

A

transportation service designed to transport children safely and reliably to and from activities

+ Glympse: Real-time tracking of the vehicle
+ App for push notification for parents
+App to plan and schedule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why are Services ideal candidates for architectural

innovation?

A

Services are typically offered as bundles whose architecture is easier to change than that of products – especially in ICT based services

ICT-based services can be rolled out on existing ICT infrastructure (Internet, etc.), bypassing physical distribution.
Example: Skype for iPhone got 1 million downloads within 2 days

New combinations can be tried out with little cost.
Example: Linkedin interface

Users may not be able to build a whole new product or a new service component, but they can link existing service components in new ways
Example: Mash-Ups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are Mash-Ups?

A

Mashups are architectural innovations – they combine
existing service elements to make them more useful

Example:

  • Hotel booking + map visualisation by google maps
  • flight booking + get to know if there’s someone on the plane you know from your social networks LinkedIn or Facebook so you can book the seat next to each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what barriers, does architectural innovation has to overcome?

A

1) current expertise = functional fixedness
- current expertise may lead to „fixed“ mental models that limit access to other solutions in the solutions space
- experts can suffer when the fundamentals of their representations are altered, resulting in significantly different performance profiles
- > get rid of the notion how we used to do thinks

2) Size of the solution space
if you need knowledge in 3 different academic profiles for an architectural innovation (50 major degrees):
(50 over 3) = 117,600 different multidisciplinary knowledge profiles
-> you can’t define the “right” qualification for arch. innovation

17
Q

a solution to overcome the barriers to architectural innovation is open innovation. Compare it with close innovation

A

closed innovation:

  • Successful innovation requires control
  • boundaries of the company’s abilities are allowing it only to create a limited kind of products and services
  • companies can’t exploit the maximum potential

open innovation:

  • the role of R&D extends far beyond the boundaries of the enterprise.
  • > insource external technology
  • > divest/ spin out/ license own technology for other firm’s markets or for a new market of their own
  • > internal/ external venture handling
18
Q

Potential solutions within the innovation space:

the „C^4“ framework for innovation

A

x: information flow and ownership
closed open

y: coordination structure
hierarchy peer to peer

bottom left: Closed shop

  • One hierarchical organisation
  • closed information boundary

bottom right: Crowdpicking

  • One hierarchical organisation + multiple individual contributors with communication links
  • collaboration in the broader sense

upper left corner: Conglomerate

  • Some hierarchical organisations with communication links
  • closed information boundary around all participating organisational entities
  • collaboration in the broader sense

upper right corner: Collaboration

  • Many individual contributors with communication links
  • collaboration in the broader sense
19
Q

Examples: Closed Shop, Crowdpicking, Conglomerate, Collaboration

A

Closed Shop
- Inhouse R&D

Crowdpicking
- Nasa Clickworkers

Conglomerate
- Multi- company R&D

Collaboration

  • Wikipedia.org
  • open source software
20
Q

Disruptive Innovation: why do incumbents not invest in

disruptive technologies?

A
  1. Disruptive products are generally simpler and
    cheaper – promise lower margins, not greater
    profits (“cannibalization”).
  2. Disruptive technologies are first commercialized in
    emerging and insignificant markets.
  3. Markets that don’t exist can’t be analyzed.
  4. Leading firm’s most profitable customers initially
    cannot use products based on disruptive technologies… but, products that closely match market needs today often follow a trajectory of improvement by which they overshoot mainstream market needs tomorrow.

Example: Mini mill steel technology