Loss Of Control Flashcards

1
Q

What happens if the defence is successful?

A

D will not receive a murder conviction, but voluntary manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who is the burden of proof on?

A

The prosecution, to disprove the defendant beyond reasonable doubt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which act and sections is the defence found under?

A

S. 54 and S.55 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which section and act did the Coroners and Justice Act replace and which defence too?

A

This replaced S.3 of the Homicide Act 1957 and the defence of provocation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the first element of the defence, and which section and act is it found under?

A

Loss of self control, and it is found under S.54 (1) (a).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the second element to the defence, and where is it found?

A

Qualifying triggers, and this is found in S.54 (1)(b).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the third element to the defence and where is it found?

A

The objective test, and this is found in S.54 (1)(c).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the first qualifying trigger, and where is it found?

A

The first qualifying trigger is that D killed due to the fear of serious violence to themselves or another. This is found in S.55 (3).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the second qualifying trigger, and where is it found?

A

The second qualifying trigger is that D killed due to things said or done, or both, in circumstances of an extremely grave character and that gave D a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged. This is found in S.55 (4).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which cases prove that if the evidence given is considered insufficient, the judge does not have to put the defence to the jury?

A

Jewell and Workman.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does loss of control have to be sudden? Which section is this found in? Which case confirms this?

A

No, it doesn’t have to be sudden, this is found in S.54 (2) and is confirmed in Dawes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Under the previous law of provocation, which 3 cases confirmed that the loss of control has to be sudden?

A

Duffy, Thornton and Alhuwalia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the case of Ashmelash confirm?

A

This confirms that intoxication is not a relevant circumstance when deciding if a person of reasonable self restraint would act in this way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is sexual infidelity classed as a qualifying trigger and which section confirms this?

A

No it is not, and this is confirmed in S.55 (6c).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case confirms that sexual infidelity is not a qualifying trigger?

A

Dawes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the case of Clinton confirm in terms of sexual infidelity?

A

It confirms that sexual infidelity can form part of those grave circumstances as if they are coupled with other things said or done. EG: taunting or teasing.

17
Q

How many elements are there to the defence?

A

3