6. Assigning a Lease and Rent Review Flashcards
What does a commercial lease typically allow in terms of assignment?
The commercial lease usually allows the assignment of the entire property.
Is it possible to assign only a part of the property in a commercial lease?
No, the assignment is typically for the entire property. This restriction is in place because many properties are unsuitable for legal and physical sub-division into separate ownership.
What are thee three statutory provisions that are relevant to assignment covenants?
- Section 19(1)(a) Landlord and Tenant Act 1927
- Section 19(1A) Landlord and Tenant Act 1927
- Section 1 Landlord and Tenant Act 1988
What is the significance of Section 19(1)(a) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 in commercial leases?
Implies into any qualified covenant (such as not to assign without the landlord’s consent) that the consent is not to be unreasonably withheld.
What is the effect of Section 19(1)(a) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 in commercial leases?
This transforms a qualified covenant into a fully qualified covenant, ensuring that the landlord’s consent cannot be unreasonably withheld.
What does Section 19(1A) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 enable in commercial leases regarding the landlord’s consent to assignment?
Section 19(1A) allows the landlord and tenant to pre-agree on conditions and circumstances in which it would not be unreasonable for the landlord to refuse consent for assignment.
What are examples of pre-agreed conditions under Section 19(1A), and how do they impact the reasonableness of the landlord’s consent?
Examples of pre-agreed conditions include the assignor providing an authorized guarantee agreement (AGA) for the assignee or the assignee agreeing to provide guarantors.
Effect: when these conditions are met, they are deemed reasonable, offering flexibility in the consent process.
What does Section 1 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1988 stipulate regarding the landlord’s response to a tenant’s application for consent to assignment in a commercial lease?
Mandates that when a tenant makes a written application for consent to assignment and there is a qualified covenant in place, the landlord must, within a reasonable time:
a) Give consent, unless there are reasonable grounds to withhold it.
b) Serve on the tenant a written notice of its decision, specifying:
i) Conditions if consent is granted.
ii) Reasons for withholding consent if applicable.
According to the Court of Appeal in 1986, what is the purpose of a fully qualified covenant against assignment in a commercial lease under Section 19(1)(a)?
The purpose is to protect the landlord from undesirable use or occupation of the premises by an undesirable tenant or assignee
What grounds are landlords not entitled to use when refusing consent to an assignment, based on the Court of Appeal’s guidelines?
Section 19(1)(a)
Landlords are not entitled to refuse consent on grounds that have nothing to do with the relationship of landlord and tenant regarding the subject matter of the lease.
What burden of proof does the landlord have in demonstrating the reasonableness of refusing consent, as per the Court of Appeal’s guidelines?
Section 19(1)(a)
The landlord is not required to prove the justifiability of its conclusions if they could be reached by a reasonable person in the circumstances.
According to the Court of Appeal’s guidelines, is it reasonable for a landlord to refuse consent based on the intended use of the premises by the proposed assignee, even if not forbidden by the lease?
Section 19(1)(a)
Yes, it may be reasonable for a landlord to refuse consent based on the proposed assignee’s intended use of the premises, even if not forbidden by the lease.
What factors should a landlord generally consider when deciding whether to refuse consent to an assignment, and are there any exceptions?
Section 19(1)(a)
A landlord should generally consider only its own relevant interests. However, it would be unreasonable not to consider extreme and disproportionate detriment to the tenant if consent is refused.
How does the Court of Appeal characterize the reasonableness of refusing consent in each case, according to the guidelines?
Section 19(1)(a)
The reasonableness of refusing consent is a question of fact, depending on all the circumstances in each case.
What are examples of situations where consent has been held to have been reasonably withheld?
- Unsatisfactory references for the proposed assignee.
- Long-standing and extensive breach of the repairing covenant by the assignor, with uncertainty about the assignee’s ability to remedy the breach.
- The assignee being in a position to compete with the landlord’s business.
- The assignment reducing the value of the landlord’s reversion, though not reasonable if the landlord has no intention of selling the reversion.
- The proposed assignee intending to carry on a use detrimental to the premises or inconsistent with the landlord’s ‘tenant mix’ policy.
- The assignee gaining protection under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, unlike the assignor.
What are examples of situations where consent has been held to have been unreasonably withheld?
- The landlord refusing consent in an attempt to gain some advantage for itself.
- Instances where there are only minor breaches of the repairing covenant.
- Premises being on the market for 18 months, where the rent is significant, and the slight harm to the landlord is outweighed by prejudice to the tenant.
Is it generally considered reasonable for a landlord to withhold consent if the assignee plans to use the premises in violation of the lease terms?
Yes, it is generally considered reasonable for a landlord to withhold consent when an assignee proposes to use the premises in breach of the lease terms.
Are there circumstances where refusing consent solely based on the anticipation of a breach of the user covenant might be deemed unreasonable?
Yes, there could be circumstances where the refusal of consent based solely on the anticipation of a breach of the user covenant would be unreasonable. Each case is evaluated on its own merits, considering what a reasonable landlord would do in the given circumstances.
What financial obligation does the lease typically establish for the tenant?
Rent Review
The lease typically reserves an annual rent, and the tenant is obligated to pay this rent, as specified in the tenant’s covenant within the lease.
What matters are required to be made clear in the lease with regards to rent?
- When rent is payable
- Whether rent is payable in advance or arrears
- How instalments are to be apportioned
- How the rent is to be paid
- VAT
- Review of the rent
What is the effect of a lease being silent on whether rent is payabled in advance or arrears?
rent is deemed to be paid in arrears - but more usual to be in advance.
What is a rent review clause?
A mechanism by which the annual rent payable under a lease is periodically reassessed.
What are the four types of a rent review clause?
- Fixed increase
- Index-linked
- Tenant’s receipts
- Open market rent review
What is a fixed increase rent review clause and what are its benefits/difficulties?
Effect: provides that at various set dates throughout the term, the rent will increase to a set amount.
Benefits: certainty + simplicity
Difficulties: predicting with certainty what rental levels are likely to e at a given point in the future.
What is an index-linked rent review clause?
- Index-linked rent are tied to external indices, like the Retail Prices Index, adjusting for inflation.
- However, they may not precisely reflect property market changes.
- ‘Cap and collar’ limits are often included to control percentage increases and ensure a minimum rise.
What is a tenant’s receipts-based rent review in a commercial lease?
It links rent adjustments to the tenant’s receipts, often tied to turnover, profits, or subletting sums. This aligns with the tenant’s financial health and incentivizes the landlord to boost the tenant’s trade.
What are potential advantages and disadvantages of a tenant’s receipts-based rent review for the landlord?
Advantages include tracking the tenant’s financial health and creating an incentive for the landlord to enhance the tenant’s trade. However, there are evident drawbacks for the landlord if the tenant’s business falters.
What is an open market rent review?
It involves adjusting rent at regular intervals (usually every 3–5 years) based on the current open market rental value of the premises.
What is the most common form of rent review clause?
Open market rent review
What is the aim of an open market rent review clause?
To determine the rent which a tenant would be prepared to pay were the property to be let in the open market on the terms of the lease on the rent review date.
Is an open market rent review literal or hypothetical and what should it be based on?
it’s a hypothetical assessment and should be based as closely as possible on the reality of the situation.
What are the two elements to consider for an open rent review?
- the physical property
- the terms of the lease itself