9 Flashcards
Give a brief definition of speaking in tongues.
“The supernatural gift of speaking in another language without its having been previously learned” (p. 220).
a. Are tongues ecstatic, unintelligible, meaningless utterances?
b. How does Scripture describe tongues? Cite a supporting verse.
a. No.
b. The language of angels or men. I Corinthians 13:1 (p. 221).
a. What Old Testament passage did Paul quote as prophecy concerning tongues?
b. Where can Paul’s use of that passage be found?
a. Isaiah 28:11-12.
b. I Corinthians 14:21-22 (p. 222).
In what two parallel passages in Acts does Peter make a connection between “the rest and refreshing” of Isaiah 28:11-12 and the gift of the Spirit?
Acts 2:38 and 3:19 (p. 221).
Given the apostles’ understanding of Isaiah 28:11-12, how do we reconcile that with the interpretation of Isaiah 28 as a prophecy of Israel’s invasion by Assyria?
This is a possible instance of prophecy having an immediate fulfillment and distant fulfillment. This is called “the law of double reference” and is commonly found in prophecy and typology (p. 222).
What are two major objections to Mark 16:17 as scriptural support for the phenomenon of tongues?
a. The following verse, Mark 16:18, is misunderstood and misapplied, thus the credibility of verse 17 is attacked. Commonly, the practices of “snake handlers” are cited in an effort to discredit verse 17.
b. Two important ancient manuscripts do not include the passage of Mark 16:9-20 (pp. 222-223).
What answer can be given to the first major objection to Mark 16:17?
The proper approach is to understand both of these verses. Verse 18 does not give authority to handle snakes as a test of faith, for we are not to tempt God (Matthew 4:7). Rather, this verse is a promise of protection in case of accidents (Acts 28:1-6). The spiritual application of verse 18 might be found in Luke 10:19, wherein evil spirits are represented as serpents and scorpions (pp. 223-224).
a. Is either the Codex Sinaiticus or Codex Vaticanus complete or accurate in and of itself?
b. Do other ancient manuscripts include Mark 16:9-20?
a. No. Both contain several apocryphal books and the Vaticanus omits all of the New Testament after Hebrews 9:14.
b. Yes. The third oldest manuscript, Codex Alexandrinus, does, among many others (p. 224).
Why is this passage in Mark attacked so eagerly?
Modern critics reject this passage because of its support of the miraculous as a sign of the power and legitimacy of God’s Word. From ancient times, this passage became questionable as most of Christendom lost contact with the Holy Spirit and the use of spiritual gifts (p. 225).
Would the Bible support the doctrines of Mark 16:16-20 if this passage were excluded?
Yes. These doctrines are found in other scriptural passages (p. 225).
a. List the three signs that accompanied the outpouring of the Spirit on the Day of Pentecost and describe what each signified.
(1)
(2)
(3)
b. Unlike the sound of wind and tongues like fire, speaking in tongues is a recurring sign of an
________________ ______ ______.
a. (1) Sound like wind—coming of the Spirit.
(2) Visible flame-like tongues—availability of the Spirit for each individual.
(3) Speaking in tongues—individual filling.
b. Individual Spirit baptism (p. 227).
What Old Testament prophecy did Peter use to identify the phenomenon of speaking in tongues?
Joel 2:28 (p. 228).
a. How did God use speaking in tongues to make the apostles understand that the gospel was available to all mankind, including the Gentiles?
b. Did God use any sign other than tongues to demonstrate conclusively to Peter and the apostles that Cornelius had received the Spirit baptism?
a. When Cornelius and his household spoke in tongues, Peter realized that God had poured out His Spirit on Gentiles. This meant that one need not convert to Judaism to be saved.
b. No. Speaking in tongues alone convinced Peter of Cornelius’ Spirit baptism (pp. 228-229).
What important lesson is illustrated by the Ephesian believers’ Spirit baptism with accompanying tongues?
This account demonstrates that the baptism of the Spirit with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues is for all believers and was not only for the first group of Jews, Samaritans, and Gentiles (pp. 229-230).
The account of the Samaritans’ receiving the Holy Ghost does not mention tongues. List three reasons for concluding that the Samaritan believers spoke in tongues:
a. Despite joy, miracles, belief, and water baptism, everyone knew that these believers had not received the Spirit. Philip, Peter, and John all expected a particular sign and knew the Samaritans did not have the Spirit due to the absence of this sign.
b. Everyone knew that the Samaritans received the Spirit when the apostles laid hands on them.
A definite sign, different from the miracles which had occurred, must have been observed.
c. The sign must have been an unmistakable, supernatural sign for Simon the Magician to be impressed enough to attempt to buy it (pp. 231-232).