A Blick - Cabinet manual/conventions Flashcards
What impact does the UK’s uncodified constitution have on the prominence of conventions?
The UK’s uncodified constitution makes conventions more prominent as they help fill in the gaps not covered by law.
What are the challenges associated with the ambiguous nature of conventions?
Conventions may be ambiguous, leading to doubts about their existence, application, and binding nature, which can complicate governance.
How do conventions evolve, and what challenges does this pose?
Conventions evolve over time, making it difficult to define their exact nature at any given moment, which can lead to uncertainties in their application.
What are the potential political implications of breaching conventions?
Breaching conventions can lead to political issues, including government instability or conflicts between branches of government.
How does the Cabinet Manual contribute to the understanding of conventions?
The Cabinet Manual may increase awareness and strengthen the understanding of conventions by providing a documented reference.
In what ways is the Cabinet Manual considered an authoritative source on conventions?
Being online and official, the Cabinet Manual serves as a frequently consulted authoritative source that guides the application of conventions.
What are the risks of codifying conventions?
Codifying conventions might restrict their ability to evolve and could potentially devalue the flexibility of uncodified conventions.
How does codification affect the courts’ role with conventions?
Codification enhances the courts’ ability to recognize and consider conventions, potentially leading to more judicial oversight.
How might the Cabinet Manual influence the definition and application of conventions?
The manual could define and influence conventions, which risk increasing executive dominance if it favours them favourably towards the executive.
What risks might the Cabinet Manual pose if biased towards the executive’s interests?
There is a risk that the manual might be biased towards the executive’s interests, skewing the balance of power and reducing checks and balances.
Why might a new subdivision be necessary for codified and non-codified conventions?
To clarify their legal and practical implications, a new subdivision might be needed to differentiate between codified and non-codified conventions.
What should be considered in the process of codifying conventions?
A more inclusive process for codifying conventions should be considered to avoid bias and ensure broader acceptance, enhancing their legitimacy and effectiveness.
