ARSON Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three different Arson Charges

A

Arson Danger to Life

Arson - Vehicle / Immovable Property & No Interest

Arson - Obtain Benefit / Cause Loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What Section for Arson Danger to Life?

A

Section 267(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What Section is Arson Vehicle / Immovable Property & No Interest?

A

Section 267(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What Section is Arson Obtain Benefit /Cause Loss?

A

Section 267(1)(c) Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the ELEMENTs for Arson -Danger to Life Section 267(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961?

A

Intentionally or Recklessly
Damages by fire/ means of any explosive
Any property
If he or she knows ( or ought to know) that danger to life is like to ensue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain Intent in relation to Arson

A

Intent invovles two parts:
(i) An intent to commit the act

And

(ii) An intent to get a specific result

Case law,

R v Collister - Intent can be inferred from circumstances.

Circumstantial evidence from which an offender’s intent can be inferred from can include:

-Offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event.

  • The surrounding circumstances.
  • The nature of the act iteslf.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain Recklessness.

A

The conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk.

Case Law

CAMERON v R

Recklessness is established if:

(a) The defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:

(i) the actions would bring about the proscribed result and / or

(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed and

(b) Having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable.

NOTE: Part A test Subjective: A recognition the risk is possible - does not need to consider it a significant risk.

Part B test Subjective /Objective: Were the offender’s actions objectively reasonable given the risk as understood by them?

Case Law
R v TIPPLE - A deliberate decision to run the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the element: Damages by fire.

A

Damages must be casually related to fire (or explosive).
Although fire damage will often involve burning and charring, it is not necessary that the property if set alight.

Case Law
R v ARCHER
Property may be damaged if it sufferes permanenet or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value.

FIRE
Fire is the result of combustion, a chemical reaction between fuel and oxygen, triggered by heat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain Explosive

A

Explosive means capable of sudden expansion owing to a release of internal engergy: and includes the capability to generate deflagaration, or pyrotechnic effects, and explosion has the corresonpding meaning.

Note: Molotov cocktails is an incindiary device, not explosive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain Property

A

Property includes any real personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and anything in action, and any other right or interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain Immovable Property

A

In general it relates to building and land, and things growing on land.

Property is considered immovable if it is currently fixed in a place, unable to be moved, even though it may be possible to make it movable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain Knows or ought to know

A

Subjective/ Objective test
Subjective - Offender’s intent, or knowledge at the time. Did they know human life likely to be endangered?
If this is unable to be proved, the Objective test still applies.

Objective: Would a reasonable person have recognised the risk of above?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Danger to Life likely to Ensue?

A

“Life’ means life, and the danger must be to the life of someone other than the Defendant.

Case Law
R v SMITH
Common sense requires the danger to life should be interupted asa danger to the life of some person other than the setter of fire.

Likely to ensue - defendant merely has to know there is a chance or risk of danger to life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What Section is Arson - Vehicle /Immovable Property & No Interest?

A

Section 267(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the ELEMENTS for Arson - Vehicle / Immovable Property & No Interest?

A
  • Intentionally or recklessly
  • Without claim of right
  • Damages by fire / means of any explosive
  • Any Immovable Property / Vehicle /Ship / Aircraft
  • In which that person has no interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Claim of Right?

A

A belief at the time of the act you either owned or had a right to possess the property in question although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or law.

  • Must relate to property
    -Must relate to property in question (but could relate to a belief in other persons right)
    -Must be held at time of offence
    -The belief must be reasonably held
17
Q

Explain Vehicle, Ship , Aircraft

A

Vehicle: A car, truck, bus etc

Ship: A vessel used in navigation, however propelled , includes barge,dinghy, raft.

Aircraft: A plane

18
Q

Explain Interest in Property

A

The Courts have held that a tenancy of a property constitutes an interest in it.

Case Law
R v WILSON
Tenancy defined by Court of Appeal as an interest in that property.

19
Q

What are the ELEMENTS for :
Arson - Obtain Benefit / Cause Loss
Section 267(1)(c) Crimes Act 1961

A

-Intentionallly
-Damages by fire /means of any explosive
- Any Immovable Property,Vehicle, Ship, Aircraft
- With intent to
-Obtain any benefit or cause loss to any other person

20
Q

Explain the element of Obtain

A

Obtain, in relation to any person, means obtain or retain for himself or any other person.

21
Q

Explain Benefit

A

In this section benefit means any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilage, property, service or valuable consideration.

Includes damage to the defendant’s own property if it was done to obtain a benefit (i.e insurance fraud).

22
Q

Explain Cause Loss

A

Financial detriment to the victim. It is not necessary that the victim’s loss results in any benefit to the offender.

Case Law
R v MORELY
Loss is assessed by the extent to which the complainant’s position prior to the offence has been diminshed or impaired.

23
Q

Explain To any Person

A

Legistlation provides a wide definition of the term “person’ that incorporates not only real people but also companies and organisations.

Example: Person who sets fire to police car could be charged as his intnent is to cause loss to the police organisation.