Basics: Governing Law & Contract Formation (mine) Flashcards

1
Q

Contracts: Governing Law

A

Sale of goods –> UCC art. 2

Lease of goods in NY –> UCC art. 2A

All others –> CL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

“Contract” & types (based upon formation)

A

= “legally enforceable agreement

  1. Express vs. Implied
  • express = formed by parties’ words;
  • implied = formed by their conduct
  1. Bilateral vs. Unilateral
  • unilateral = offer can be accepted ONLY by complete performance
  • bilateral = offer can be accepted in any manner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What to do if no enforceable K?

A

Restitution

  • = equitable remedy
    • protects against unjust enrichment when contract law yields unfair result
  • entitles to “reasonable value of benefit conferred”
    • NOT the contract value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Contract Formation

A

To form a contract, requires:

  1. Apparent, mutual assent to form same bargain at same time
  2. Mutual consideration

Usual Process: Offer & Acceptance

  1. Offer
  2. Offer terminated?
  3. Acceptance
  4. Consideration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Contract Formation:

  1. Offer
A

Offer must be:

  1. = Manifestation of intent to be bound
    • reasonable person standard
  2. Sufficiently definite so that it may be enforced
    • Art 2: quantity must be objectively determinable (requirements K ok)
    • Price- not required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Offer Terminated?
A

4 ways to terminate:

Lapse

Revocation

Rejection by Offeree

Termination of Offer By Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Offer Terminated:

Lapse

A

Offer automatically lapses after “reasonable period of time”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Offer Termination:

Revocation by Offeror

A

General Rule:

  • Offer can be revoked by offeror any time before acceptance

How:

  • Direct revocation
    • = offeror directly communicates notice of revocation to offeree
  • Indirect revocation
    • = offeror engages in conduct that indicates intent to revoke & offeree is aware of the conduct

Exceptions: Irrevocable offers (NY: 3 types; MS: 4 types)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Irrevocable Offers

(NY: 3 exceptions; MS: 4 exceptions)

A

(= exceptions to rule that Offeror can revoke any time before acceptance)

  1. Option Contract
  • MS: OPtion K
    • K for which consideration exchanged for agreeemnt not to revoke offer
  • NY: Option K
    • = written, signed promise not to revoke offer
  • Duration: time stated
  1. Merchant’s Firm Offer [UCC Art. 2]
  • Merchant’s firm offer =:
    • signed
    • written offer
    • by merchant
    • that gives assurance offer will remain open
  • Duration:
    • default: reasonable period not to exceed 3 mos.
    • can overwrite but not exceed 3 mos.
  1. Foreseeable Reliance upon Offer
  • narrow
    • (generally, reliance not foreseeable until accept)
  • ex: contractor relies upon subcontractor’s offer
  1. Unilateral K IF offeree Commences Performance [MS only]
  • Upon commencement of performance, unilateral k’s offer becomes irrevocable
  • (BUT acceptance not until complete)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Termination of Offer:

Rejection by Offeree

A

Includes:

  • Counteroffer
    • does NOT include mere inquiry/bargaining
  • *Conditional acceptance [CL & Art 2]
    • = rejection & counteroffer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happens where offeree’s acceptance varies terms?

A

CL: Mirror Image Rule

  • If offeree’s response differs in any way, then his communication = rejection & counteroffer
  • (no contract formed)

Art 2:

  • If offeree’s response communicates acceptance, but varies terms –> K formed, BUT offeree’s different terms may not be included
  • For new terms to be included, must be:
      1. Boht parties are merchants
      1. Altered terms are not material
        * test = whether will cause offeree surprise/hardship
      1. Offeror did not object before/does not object within reasonable time after offeree’s acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Offer Terminated:

Termination by Operation of Law

(4 ways)

A
  1. Death of Either party
  • Exception: Option Contract
  • Effective: upon date of death (not notice)
  1. Insanity of Either Party
  • Exception: Option Contract
  • Effective: upon date declared insane by court
  1. Destruction of Subject Matter of K
    * (before acceptance)
  2. Illegality of Subject Matter of K
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Requirements K

A

= K for seller’s entire output OR buyer’s entire demand

UCC art. 2:

  • Enforceable, even tho omit quantity, b/c quantity can be determined by objective facts

Unenforceable ONLY if drastic increase in demand/supply

  • effect: would take other party by surprise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Acceptance
A

Default rules:

  • Means of acceptance is controlled by the offer’s terms
  • if not restricted, can accept in any reasonable manner
    • Starting performance?
      • if unilateral –> No, only completion is acceptance
      • if bilateral –> yes
    • NO Silence as acceptance [UCC, CL]
      • NY: If send unsolicited merchandise, is gift
  • Effective
    • when mailed
  • f
    *
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Improper Performance?

A

CL:

  • = acceptance and simultaneous breach of K

UCC art. 2:

  • = acceptance and simultaneous breahc
  • UNLESS:
    • sent as accomodation
    • & with notice as accomodation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mailbox Rule

A

Default rules for effective times:

  • Acceptance:
    • when mailed
  • Revocation:
    • when received by offeree
  • Rejection:
    • when received by offeror

Exceptions

    1. Option Contracts
    1. Contract/offer terms state otherwise

Special applications:

  • Acceptance then rejection:
    • Acceptance effective first –> contract
    • Exception: Rejection received first & detrimental reliance
  • Rejection sent, then acceptance:
    • *Whichever is received first!
17
Q
  1. Consideration
A

= “bargained-for change in legal position of both parties”

CanNOT be:

  1. Past consideration
    • = consideration already given/performed
    • NY: exception:
      • stated in writing
      • & past performance can be proved
  2. Discharge of existent debt
    • for less than owed
    • NY exception:
      • stated in writing
      • & signed
  3. Illusory promise
    1. = performance obligation/standard is at complete discretion of one party
    2. ex: unqualified right to cancel

Can be:

  1. Financial
  2. Promise of future performance
  3. Forbearance
  4. Renewal of promise to pay existent debt IF:
    • _technical defens_e stands in way of enforcement
    • & promised in writing
  5. Legal detriment
    1. (agreement not to do something obligated to do)
18
Q

Defenses against K Formation

(9)

A
  1. Lack of capacity
  2. Misrepresentation/Non-Disclosure of Material Fact
  3. Ambiguity/Misunderstanding
  4. Mutual Mistake
  5. Unilateral Mistake
  6. Absence of Consideration
  7. Public Policy Exceptions
  8. Unconscionability
  9. Statute of Frauds
19
Q

Defense against K Formation:

Incapacity: Infancy, Mental Incompetency, Intoxication

A

Effect: Contract voidable by incapacitated party

a) Infancy

  • Minor party may disaffirm K either:
    • during minority OR within reasonable time after reaching age of majority
    • but not after ratifies (implicit by accepting benefit of K after reach age of majority)
  • Exceptions:
    • MS/NY: Restitution for supplying “necessaries”
    • NY: Enforceable K categories
      • life insurance for 14.5 yrs +
      • Educational loans for 16 yrs+
      • Realty K’s for marital property
      • K’s for artistic/athletic services

b) Mental Incompetency

  • Mentally incapacitated person may disaffirm upon regaining competency (lucid interval/permanent)
  • Standard for incompetency:
    • NY: to void K,
      • MUST be adjudicated incompetent
      • OR must be able to restor other party to previous position

c) Intoxication

  • Intoxicated person may disaffirm K IF:
    • could not understand the nature & significance o his promise
    • AND other party had reason to know/actual knowledge of intoxication
20
Q

Defenses against K FOrmation:

Economic Duress

A

Requirements:

  1. Selling party th_reatens not to perform on existing contract obligation _
  2. Buyer o_nly enters to secure perforamnce_ on existing obligation
  3. Buyer has _no reasonable alternative _
21
Q

Defenses against K Formation:

Material Misrepresentation/Omission

A

–> Contract voidable

Requires:

  1. material
    • Factually incorrect statement OR omission

(need not have intent to defraud)

22
Q

Defenses to K Formation:

Ambiguity/Misunderstanding

A

Where no mutual understanding, no K (void).

Exception: where one party had reason to know/knew other party’s meaning

ex: two ships named same thing leaving at different times –> no K

23
Q

Defenses to K Formation:

Mistake

A

a) Mutual Mistake

  • Voidable ONLY IF:
    • 1) both parties mistaken as to basic assumption upon which the K is formed
    • 2) mistake is material
    • 3) party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk
  • “material/basic assumption”?
    • test = whether induced party to enter the K
    • NOT value (both parties assume risk)
  • f

b) Unilateral Mistake

  • Voidable ONLY IF:
    • 1) 1 party mistaken as to basic assumption upon which the K was formed
    • 2) mistake is material
    • 3) party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk
      • 4) Other party had reason to know of the mistaken party’s mistake
24
Q

Defenses to K Formation:

Absence of Consideration

A

Look for:

  • Illusory promise
  • Past consideration
    • (NY exception for written & signed)
25
Q

Defenses to K Formation:

Public Policy Exceptions

A

a) Covenant Not to Compete

  • test = whether the covenant operates as a restraint on trade
    • 2 factors:
      • i) whether necessary (unique service/goods)
      • ii) scope (duration & geographic)
  • Effect: court may invalidate OR narrow the scope

b) Exculpatory Clauses beyond negligence

  • Cannot exculpate for:
    • gross negligence
    • recklessness
    • intentional torts
26
Q

Defenses to K Formation:

Unconscionability

A

Generally, not a valid excuse

2 types unconscionability:

  • a) Substantive
    • = unfair terms
  • b) Procedural
    • = unfair process

Court’s Options:

  • Void the entire K/clause
  • Rewrite to make fair
27
Q

Defense to K Formation:

Statute of Frauds- scope

(NY- 9 categories; MS- 5 categories)

A

Statute of Frauds requires particular types of contracts to be memorialized in writing

  • CL: by party against whom seek enforcement
  • UCC:
    • by party against whom seek enforcement
    • OR merchant’s confirmatory memo
      • IF:
        • both parties are merchants
        • other party does not object to terms in memo w/in 10 days
      • –> Can use opposing party’s signed written confrimation as evidence

MS/NY Scope:

  1. On their terms canNOT be performed in 1 year
    • Lifetime K?
      • MS: not w/in scope of SOF
      • NY: IS w/in scope of SOF
    1. Exception: actual complete performance w/in one year
  2. Goods in value of $500+ [UCC art. 2]
    1. ​Exceptions:
      1. ​1) Goods accepted OR paid for by buyer
      2. 2) Custom-made goods IF:
        1. ​seller has made “substantial start”
          • no alternative buyer
      3. 3) Judicial admission that K existed
        1. (deposition/oral testimony)
  3. Transfers of interest in real property
    1. includes any interest:
      1. mortgage, deed,
      2. leases enduring more than 1 year
      3. real estate agent k’s [equal dignities rule]
    2. Exception:
      1. Buyer can enforce IF partial performance (2/3):
        1. buyer makes some payment
        2. buyer makes substantial improvement
        3. buyer in possession
  4. Suretyship
    1. = promsie to answer for the debt of another
    2. MS: Main purpose exception:
      1. if original K’s main purpose is to benefit the surety, suretyship need not be in writing
  5. Contract modifications
    1. if the modified contract falls w/in SOF
    2. Others required by parties?
      1. UCC- yes
      2. CL- NO
        1. (parties cannot create own SOF)

NY only:

  1. Leases of goods in value of $1,000+ [UCC art. 2A]
  2. Assignment of Insurance Policy
  3. Promise to pay discharged debts
  4. Agreement to pay finder’s fee/broker commission
    1. UNLESS recipient is:
      1. attorney
      2. auctioneer
      3. licensed real estate broker
28
Q

Defenses against K Formation:

Statute of Frauds: Satisfactory Writing

A

For S/F:

  1. Writing, signed by party against whom seek to enforce
    • States material tersm (who & what)

For UCC art. 2 (2 possible ways)

  1. WRiting:
    1. 1) signed by party against whom seek to enforce
      • 2) states all material terms (q)
  2. OR Merchant’s Confirmatory Memo:
    1. 1) signed by party seeking to enforce K
    2. 2) states material terms
      • 3) opposing party did not object w/in 10 days of receipt

For UCC art. 2A (NY)

  1. Writing signed by party against whom seek to enforce
  2. State its a lease of goods
  3. Include all material terms
    1. q, duration, rental payment
29
Q

How modify K?

A

CL Checklist:

    1. Modification ONLY if receive additional consideration
    1. Need SOF?

UCC Art. 2:

  • Modification permissible if in good faith
  • (additional consideration NOT necesary)