How Long Should Noncardiac Surgery
Be Delayed Following Acute Myocardial
Infarction?
○ The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommend avoidance of surgery for 60 days after acute MI.
○ This is partly based on a large retrospective study of 563,842 patients with recent MI having hip surgery, cholecystectomy, elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or lower limb amputation.
○ The rate of postoperative MI decreased significantly as the interval between preoperative MI and surgery increased (0–30 days = 32.8%; 31–60 days = 18.7%; 61–90 days = 8.4%; and 91–180 days = 5.9%).
○ The 30-day mortality rate associated
with postoperative MI decreased in a similar fashion (0–30 days = 14.2%; 31–60 days = 11.5%;
1–90 days = 10.5%; and 91–180 days = 9.9%).
○ It is worth noting that the elevated postoperative mortality risk when
undergoing surgery 6 months after MI (9.9%) is greater than the 30-day mortality after acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
from all causes by a factor of 2–3.
○ In patients undergoing surgery after recent MI, revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/stenting or coronary artery bypass surgery has been shown to improve postoperative infarction, and 30-day and 1-year mortality rate by at least50% [4].
○ However, citing a lack of extensive evidence, the ACC/AHA recommend against routine coronary revascularization before noncardiac surgery outside of the current practice guidelines for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCI
What Is the Difference Between Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction?
○ Type 1 MI is a spontaneous MI in the setting of atherothrombotic coronary artery disease.
• Type 1 MI is what we usually consider a traditional MI.
• It is usually secondary to plaque
rupture or erosion.
○ Type 2 MI is due to a mismatch between myocardial oxygen supply and demand.
• Coronary artery disease may be
present, but it is not the primary cause. • Common underlying etiological causes include coronary artery dissection, spasm, emboli, anemia, arrhythmias, and hypotension.
• The key diagnostic features of type 2 MI are an elevated and changing
troponin, clinical features not consistent with type 1 MI, presence of clinical conditions known to disrupt oxygen supply/demand, e.g., tachycardia, and absence of causes
indicating other nonischemic causes of raised troponin, e.g., myocarditis
What Is Acute Coronary Syndrome?
“Acute coronary syndrome” is an umbrella term for myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) and unstable angina.
• It is a medical emergency and necessitates referral to a cardiologist for evaluation and treatment that may include revascularization and subsequent initiation of antiplatelet therapy
What Complications Is the Patient
with Ischemic Heart Disease Subject
to in the Perioperative Period?
• Perioperative MI
• Cardiac failure
• Cardiac arrest
• Arrhythmia
• Stroke
• Death
What Are the Characteristic
Features of Perioperative
Myocardial Infarction?
○ Unlike spontaneously occurring MIs, it is quite usual for the patient experiencing a perioperative MI to be asymptomatic .
○ In a study of 2546 patients at increased cardiovascular risk undergoing noncardiac surgery, only 6% of patients with postoperative MI reported chest pain (the incidence of post-operative MI was 16%).
○ Because the typical symptoms of
myocardial ischemia are not exhibited, the diagnosis is easily missed.
○ Perioperative MI has a poor prognosis; despite its asymptomatic nature, 30-day mortality (10%) may be higher than that associated with non-postoperative MI (30-day
mortality for NSTEMI and STEMI is approximately 2% and 2–10%, respectively.
○ The highest risk of death is in the
first 48 postoperative hours.
○ Because of the silent nature of
postoperative ischemia, routine monitoring of troponin level is recommended in at-risk patients for the first 72 postoperative hours
What Is Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS)?
○ Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) is defined as prognostically relevant myocardial injury due to ischemia occurring within 30 days of noncardiac surgery.
○ Diagnosis is made in the presence of elevated troponin with or without ischemic symptoms or ECG changes.
○ MINS is common with a reported incidence of up to 18% and is associated with a high 30-day mortality rate (4.1%).
Describe a General Approach to
Evaluation of a Patient with a History
of Acute Coronary Syndrome Who Is
Scheduled to Undergo Noncardiac Surgery?
• Has the patient had an ST elevation MI (STEMI) or a non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI), and if so, was this a recent occurrence? Is ongoing unstable angina a concern?
• What is the estimated risk of a major adverse coronary event (MACE)?
• When is it appropriate to order further investigations, e.g., exercise or pharmacological stress testing, echocardiography or angiography?
• What is the patient’s functional capacity, and how does it relate to decision-making with regard to further investigations?
• When should revascularization be considered preoperatively?
Having Decided That Our Patient Has
Established Coronary Artery Disease, How
Do We Negotiate Step 2 of the ACC/AHA?
○ This patient’s surgery, though time-sensitive, is not an emergency.
○ There is time for further evaluation.
○ In this case, the patient can be referred to a cardiologist for optimization according to what the ACC/AHA refer to as “guideline-
directed medical therapy” for STEMI and NSTEMI
How Is the Risk of a Major Cardiovascular Complication Estimated Prior to Surgery?
○ A number of risk-prediction tools, e.g., Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator are used to estimate the risk of non-fatal
perioperative MI or cardiovascular death (together, non-fatal
perioperative MI and cardiovascular death occasionally form a composite end-point in clinical trials, referred to as major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE])
○ The ACS NSQIP is a web-based universal risk calculator that is predictive for 18 disparate complications, including MI and cardiac arrest.
○ A separate risk calculator, the American College of Surgeons Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest Calculator (ACS MICA), looks specifically at perioperative cardiac events.
○ All risk-prediction tools incorporate elements of risk related to patient history in combination with surgical complexity.
○ Level B evidence (data derived from a single randomized trial or nonrandomized studies) suggests that patients found
to be at low risk of MACE do not benefit from further investigations prior to elective surgery
Revised Cardiac Risk Index or NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator—Which Is Better for Assessing Perioperative Risk?
○ Critics of ACS NSQIP and MICA maintain that they likely underestimate cardiac risk because patients in contributing studies did not undergo perioperative troponin testing.
○ Similarly, neither NSQIP risk calculator has undergone external validation in a study that systematically monitored troponin measurements after noncardiac surgery
○ In contrast, the RCRI has been externally validated, and its predictive value was found to be significant in all types of elective noncardiac surgery except for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
○ A further criticism of the NSQIP calculators relates to the definition of MI in the studies used to derive the NSQIP risk indices, which included only STEMIs or a large increase in troponin (>3 times normal) that occurred in symptomatic patients.
○ As we saw earlier, most postoperative infarcts tend to be of the NSTEMI variety and silent.
○ Advocates for both NSQIP risk calculators point to the large patient numbers and multicenter methodology used in their development: over 200,000 patients from more than 250 hospitals for ACS MICA and over 1.4 million patients from 393 hospitals for ACS NSQIP.
○ The RCRI was developed from a prospective single-center cohort of 4315 patients.
○ In summary, the RCRI is a simple and easy-to-use risk prediction tool, while the ACS NSQIP provides a more detailed and wider ranging assessment of risk, beyond cardiovascular risk, which takes specific surgical procedures into account.
○ There is no evidence that one is clearly superior.
What Do the RCRI and the NSQIP Surgical
Risk Calculator Tell Us About Our Patient?
○ He has an RCRI score of 5 (all parameters are present except history of cerebrovascular disease).
○ This gives him a 15% risk estimate for MI, cardiac arrest, or death within 30 days of surgery.
○ According to the NSQIP surgical
risk calculator, he has a 5.6% risk of MI or cardiac arrest up to 30 days after surgery.
Having Established That the Patient Is at Risk
for a Major Cardiac Complication, What Are
the Next Steps in Assessment?
○ The next step in the evaluation of the high-risk patient is determination of functional capacity.
○ The long-established metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score is frequently used for this (Table 2.5).
○ The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)
is a self-assessment tool consisting of 12 questions relating to activities of daily living which appears to be a more objective measure of functional capacity.
○ It has been shown to be a better predictor of death or MI within 30 days of major elective noncardiac surgery.
○ A finding of poor functional capacity warrants pharmacological stress testing (myocardial perfusion imaging or dobutamine stress echocardiography) if surgery is not urgent and the patient is a willing and appropriate candidate for revascularization.
○ In other words, we must be reasonably certain that stress testing will change our approach to perioperative care.
○ Patients who are at increased cardiac risk with unknown functional capacity may proceed to exercise stress testing if, similarly, it will alter preoperative optimization.
○ Routine exercise stress testing is not beneficial for patients undergoing low-risk surgery or for patients deemed to be low risk for MACE.
Is Echocardiographic Assessment of Left
Ventricular Function of Benefit?acs
○ There appears to be little value in performing preoperative echocardiography in a non-discriminatory manner in cardiac patients.
○ ACC/AHA recommend against routine
preoperative echocardiographic assessment of LV function except for investigation of dyspnea of unknown origin, worsening dyspnea in the heart failure patient, and reassessment of LV function in clinically stable patients with previously documented LV dysfunction who have not been assessed within the past year.
○ The Canadian Cardiovascular Society recommends against performing resting echocardiography to enhance perioperative cardiac risk estimation.
○ The two exceptions to this are clinical
evidence of an undiagnosed severe obstructive intracardiac abnormality (e.g., aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) or severe pulmonary hypertension
Which Noninvasive Imaging Technique—
Stress Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion
Imaging or Stress Echocardiography—Is
Preferable?
○ Practical or logistical concerns often dictate which noninvasive stress imaging test in performed, e.g., local availability,
expertise, patient body habitus (precluding adequate echocardiography views), and cost.
○ Both imaging techniques have similar diagnostic accuracy.
○ A single meta-analysis demonstrated that stress myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and stress echocardiography had similar sensitivities but stress echocardiography had higher specificity for detection of coronary artery disease.
○ Both myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography had better discriminatory capabilities than exercise stress testing
When Is Preoperative Angiography Indicated?
○ The indications for angiography before surgery are similar to those in a nonsurgical setting, i.e., high-risk features seen on noninvasive imaging.
○ Examples include a strongly positive exercise stress test, imaging study suggestive of a significant amount of viable myocardium at risk, and multiple reversible defects.
What Are the Indications for Revascularization in the High-Risk
Cardiac Patient Awaiting Noncardiac
Surgery?
○ Recommendations for revascularization are the same as those for all patients with coronary artery disease, i.e., there are no RCTs which demonstrate perioperative benefit from revascularization.
○ Indications for coronary revascularization (including the specific indications for CABG versus PCI) are beyond the scope of this book, but the decision to proceed is generally based upon the location and severity of the lesion, e.g., significant left main coronary artery disease, the number of diseased arteries, and the presence of left ventricular dysfunction.
○ It should be borne in mind that patients undergoing PCI will need to have surgery
deferred while on antiplatelet therapy.
For How Long Should Surgery Be Postponed in a Patient Who Has Undergone Coronary Artery Stenting?
○ Premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in PCI patients can lead to stent thrombosis, MI, and death.
○ General recommendations for DAPT are extensively reviewed in the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and the 2018 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy.
○ Patients with ACS who have undergone PCI with bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) will require DAPT with aspirin and an ADP receptor antagonist, e.g., clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel, for at least 12 months.
○ According to the more recently updated Canadian guidelines, patients who have elective PCI in the absence of ACS will require DAPT for 6 months in the form of aspirin and clopidogrel, if not at high risk of bleeding.
○ If risk of bleeding is high, DAPT is required for 1 month with BMS and
3 months for DES.
○ This is an evolving area as stent morphology and therapeutics are constantly being amended with one goal being to reduce the duration of DAPT.
○ Patients with a stent requiring elective noncardiac surgery should be evaluated bearing in mind the following considerations: urgency of surgery, risk of bleeding related to antiplatelet therapy, stent thrombosis in the absence of antiplatelet therapy, and type of stent, i.e., BMS versus DES.
○ Each patient should be managed on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the patient’s interventional cardiologist.
○ Recommendations in general are based on low-quality evidence. Canadian and US guidelines are provided
ACS in Our Patient Was Treated
with Intravenous Heparinization
and DAPT. If He Had Not Experienced Frank
Hematuria, For How Long Should DAPT Have
Been Continued?
Patients with medically managed ACS who are not
revascularized are treated with DAPT for at least 12 months
if bleeding complications do not occur
How Can Perioperative Cardiac Risk
Be Medically Modified?acs
○ The question of whether to initiate pharmacological agents or to maintain those on which the patient is already
established is an ever-changing domain.
○ A summary of current recommendations from the ACC/AHA and Canadian Cardiovascular Society is presented in Table 2.8
Should This Patient Have BNP Measured Preoperatively as a Screening Measure for Postoperative Myocardial Injury?
○ The Canadian Cardiovascular Society recommends measuring BNP before noncardiac surgery when RCRI ≥1, if the patient is 65 years or older or is 45–64 years with significant cardiovascular disease.
○ Patients with preoperative BNP >92 pg/mL should have daily pos-toperative troponin measurement for 48–72 hours to detect silent ischemia.
○ However, considering our patient had a recent episode of ACS with congestive cardiac failure and a recent BNP value of 464, it is of doubtful value.
○ In this case, daily postoperative troponin measurement is indicated regardless
True/False
Elective surgery should be deferred for at least
6 months after acute myocardial infarction.
F
True/False
By definition, myocardial injury after noncardiac
surgery occurs within 30 days of surgery.
T
True/False
Most perioperative myocardial infarcts are
symptomatic.
F
True/False
Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is a superior peri-
operative cardiac risk prediction tool when compared
with the American College of Surgeons National
Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP)
F