Case Law Flashcards
Saxton v Police
To import includes:
- “to introduce from abroad or
- to cause to be brought in from a foreign country”
R v Hancox
- The bringing of goods into the country or causing them to be brought into the country does not cease as the aircraft or vessel enters NZs Territorial limits.
- importing into NZ for the purposes of s6(1)(a) is a process
- The element of importing exists from the time the goods enter NZ until they reach their immediate destination
- ie when they have ceased to be under the control of the appropriate authorities and become available to the consignee or addressee.
R v Strawbridge
- It is not necessary for the Crown to establish knowledge on the part of the accused
- in the absence of evidence to the contrary, knowledge on her part will be presumed,
- but if there is some evidence that the accused honestly believed on reasonable grounds that her act was innocent,
- then she is entitled to be acquitted unless the jury is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that this was not so.
Police v Emirali
The serious offence of possessing a narcotic does not extend to some minute and useless residue of the substance
R v Rua
The words “produce” or “manufacture” in s6(1)(b) broadly cover the creation of controlled drugs by some form of process which changes the original substances into a particular controlled drug.
R v Maginnis
[Supply involves] more than the mere transfer of physical control.. [it includes] enabling the recipient to apply the thing … to purposes for which he desires
R v During
[An offer is] an intimation by the person charged to another that he is ready on request to supply to that other drugs of a kind prohibited by the statute
R v Brown (Instances where Guilty)
The defendant is guilty in the following instances:
1 - offers to supply a drug that he has on hand (on hand)
2 - offers to supply a drug that will be procured at some future date (future)
3 - offers to supply a drug that he mistakenly believes he can supply (mistake)
4 - offers to supply a drug deceitfully, knowing he will not supply that drug. (Deceit)
R v Brown (Charlie Brown)
The making of such an intimation, with the intention that it should be understood as a genuine offer, is an offence
R v Forrest and Forrest
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of [the victims] age
R v Cox (possession)
- Possession involves two elements
- the first, the physical part, is actual or potential physical custody or control
- the second, the mental part, is a combination of knowledge and intention
- knowledge is the sense of an awareness by the accused that the substance is in his possession
- and intention to exercise possession