Ch 2 Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Smith v Hughes

A

Objective theory of agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hartog v Collins and Shields

A

Snapping up doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gibson v Manc City Council

A

nature of an offer - showing communication of acceptance and intention to create legal relations to be necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Harris v Nickerson

A

statement on intention in the negotiation process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Harvey v Facey

A

supply of information in negotiation process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pharmaceutical Society v Boots

A

display of goods as an invitation to treat, not an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Partridge v Crittenden

A

advertisement as an invitation to treat, not an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Gibbons v Proctor

A

communication of acceptance of an offer is required, and this acceptance must mirror original offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tinn v Hoffman

A

problems of cross offers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Brogen v Met Railway

A

acceptance can be communicated by words / conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hyde v Wrench

A

counter offer rejects the original, destroying it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly