Chapter 13 Flashcards

1
Q

Define Idealist Perspective

A

Idealism refers to any theory that suggests that behavior is governed by beliefs, meanings, and values that are to a greater or lesser degree independent of the material conditions of life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define French Structuralism

A

The methodology that elements of human culture must be understood by way of their relationship to a larger, overarching system of structure. It works to uncover the structures that underlie all the things that humans do, think, perceive, and feel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define signifier and signified

A

Signifier= Phonetic sound made (or extra linguistic like a flag or hand signal) when saying the word EX:// sound table. Signified= Actual object that the word describes EX:// actual table.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe Binary Opposition

A

The primary quality of the human mind, according to Levi-strauss, is its tendency to create binary oppositions i.e to think in opposites. Many dichotomies are culture specific, so the many cultures recognize kinship or ritual groups that stand in opposition to each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Symbolic/interpretive anthropology

A

The study of cultural symbols and how those symbols can be used to better understand a particular society. It is often viewed in contrast to cultural materialism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Thick Description

A

Not explanatory he wants his writing to highlight that he is there (writes in third person) and emerges himself into their culture. We have to study meaning rather than behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe “reading culture like a text”

A

Culture is textual, it is an elaborate assemblage of symbols that the anthropologist must strive to interpret.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define Ethnoscience

A

Linguistically grounded. Methodology=etic based and elicts large topographies of domains. Ethno=getting everything you can about a society and science= methodology, etic, explanatory. It is idosynchratic and obtains an overall emic understanding. Did a domain at a time, and created taxonomies. Gathered data by creating long verbal surveys and interviews, every informant was given the exact same question to ensure reliability while validity came from getting a taxonomy that covers every case as we add to it.

  • What they claimed to know is emic, it is the only branch of theory that we have that sorts the method as etic and looks for an emic answer.
  • Confidential analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Componential analysis

A

Used as an analytic tool when we have a lot of qualitative data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who is Clifford Geertz?

A

“Reading culture like a text”. Termed “Thick Description” not explanatory, he wants his writing to highlight that he is there (writes in first person). Termed Evocation: gives us a sense that we are there. We have an understanding of our surroundings. Multivocality= multiple voices and a range of responses. Dismissive of the idea that Anthro could ever be a scientific endeavor.

  • Ethnographic strategy, hermeneutic
  • Emic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who is Claude Levi-Strauss?

A

Culture arises from the structures of the human mind, which he contends operates and is organized in a similar fashion in all places. His anthropology rests on a linguistic analogy in that he argues that the human capacity for culture is similar to our capacity for language. He argued that underneath the tremendous diversity of cultural practice there are universal processes of thought. Looked at myth, stories, kinship systems and had the notion that stories had to do with the juxtaposition of binary oppositions. Biggest binary opposition= culture and nature. He actually gathered the data by informant to try and get to the core of individuals to describe all of humanity.
FROM POWERPOINT
-Reacting to both functionalism and historical particularism
-Strong influence on succeeding intrepretist theorists such as Lacan, Derrida, and Foucault
-Freud and Levi-Strauss Agreed About the Location
of Culture but ended because while Freud located the ontology of culture in the seething unconscious, nonrational impulses and desires of the psyche Levi-Strauss proposed a cognitive human universal (Levi-Strauss argued that the fundamental structure of human cognition – thought– is universally the same process grounded in brain structure but manifest in many different cultural systems).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who is Ferdinand de Saussure?

A

Swiss linguist who argued for a relational view of linguistic elements. Rather than looking at language as a set of names for things or a set of words with meanings, Saussure’s structuralism considers language as a universe sign.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who is Victor Turner?

A

Used some notion of structuralism but he was also doing symbolic analysis aka more interpretive. The “Three Three’s”
-Methodology
Participant observation (Emic)
Testimony from experts (Emic)
Etic analysis (Adding western analysis to observations)
-Symbols
Condensation (EX:// Milk tree representative of connection between mom and child. Or the fertility of men is represented in the milk tree as well).
Polarization (EX:// American flag)
Unification of disparate significa
-Rites of Passage
Separation (Separation from everyday life away from community)
Transformation (Physical or behavioral act that changes your current status). Separation and transformation (liminality) (EX:// Being engaged, not single but not yet married).
Integration: Com back into your social organization as a new individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who is Mary Douglas?

A

Employed structuralist theories to dietary practices. Defined polluting as “matter out of place” (Blood belongs on the inside, not on the outside). Tried to resolve this issue by expanding her discussion of the logic of biblical proscriptions on certain foods. She believed that the human body is a common universal that can stand for any bounded system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the “alliance theory” of incest avoidance:

A

Coined by Levi Strauss’ comprises the dominant explanation in anthropology today of this cultural universal. Triggered decades of debate, however.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the weaknesses of French structuralism? Strengths?:

A

Strauss believed in a universal human mind but there is no evidence that this exists and they didn’t believe that materialism helped explain the variety of human culture.

17
Q

Key features of ethnoscience. Explanatory? Interpretive? Emic/etic?

A

Ethnoscience is not explanatory or interpretive. Use etic to gain understanding but ultimately gain an overall emic understanding

18
Q

“Elements form patterns”

A

Levi-Strauss’s anthropology extends the linguistic systems of Saussure to other domains of social enquiry – to social practices of exchange, kinship, food and myths. As one commentator has described it his concern was to see social organisation “as a combination of elements, never intelligible in itself, but only when its internal arrangement can be seen as one amongst others” (Glucksman 235).

19
Q

What are the Basics of Structuralism

A

The deep structure cognitive feature of human brains that gave rise to culture is structurally imposed by meaning-making impelled by binary oppositions in symbols.

  • This approach relies on “sense data” – truth below the empirical surface. Data dependent on the researcher to identify and analyze basic patterns.
  • Data souces: kinship systems, myths, religious beliefs
20
Q

Describe Language and Social Systems

A

Myth shares with language the following characteristics:

  1. It’s made of units that are put together according to certain rules.
  2. These units form relationships with each other, based on opposites which provide the basis of the structure
21
Q

What is the relationship between thought and action?

A

While cultural materialist argue that behavior precedes thought, structuralists argue the reverse: thought precedes action.

22
Q

What is the role of the informant?

A

In this theoretical framework, the methodology is to get the basic object for study, a myth for example, and then apply a structuralist analysis to the work. It is neither necessary nor desirable to ask the person who recounted the myth to also explain its meaning.

23
Q

Describe Synchronic

A
  • Besides being an etic enterprise, Levi-Strauss’ method of analysis was synchronic rather than historical.
  • Like fractal art, he believed that the more complete the pattern, the more likely one would find a universal human mind.
24
Q

Describe Individual and Group

A

Levi-Strauss’ object of study, despite being centered in human cognition, is the entity “society” – not the individuals who comprise that society. In that respect he falls in the line of Durkheim and Mauss. Individuals are no more important to his analysis than individual speakers are to linguistics.

25
Q

What is the basic orientation of the symbolic/interpretive school of anthropology?

A
  • Mentalist, linguistic, and symbolic study

- Very hermeneutic

26
Q

Structuralism and Linguistics

A

Structuralism parallels linguistic theory in its cognitive approach to meaning-making. So it is useful here to refresh basic linguistic concepts and then to extend those concepts to cultural structuralism.

27
Q

What are the Linguistic Basics

A

The smallest units of sound that carry meaning are called phonemes
Phonemes are identified using a “minimal pairs test”
E.g. – big, pig, fig, MIG meet the criteria for change in meaning with a change in sound

28
Q

Language having varying numbers of Phonemes

A

English – mid 30s (depends on vowel variation)
The least number is found in Rotokas (11)
The biggest inventory is found in the !Kung San
70% of languages have between 20 and 37

29
Q

What are morphemes

A

Morphemes are the smallest contrastive units of sound PLUS grammar

For example–
un happi ness
prefix root suffix
Each of these morphemes carry meaning both because of sound and placement (grammar)

30
Q

Define Syntax

A

Syntax refers to the way words are arranged to show relationships of meaning within and between sentences.

Grammar =phonology+syntax+semantics

Semantics = meaning

31
Q

Describe the Unconcious

A

Language users do not “know” at a conscious level how the dynamics of meaningful speech are composed. They simply “do it” by mimesis – language learned as children. Learning the core dynamics allows them to make new, meaningful utterances.
Analogy: Particular languages are the software run on the brain’s hardware

32
Q

Describe the Congruence between Structuralism and Linguistics

A

Levi-Strauss argued that culture is to language as structuralism is to linguistics. Instead of phonemes, units of cultures are symbols that are patterned into systems of meaning.
Contrasting pairs of symbols create the grounds for interaction
Symbols are polysemous – especially potent symbols cover vast domains

33
Q

Describe Binary Oppositions (from slides)

A

Rather than the minimal pairs test of phonemics, Levi Strauss argued that in the deep structure of human cognition, distinction is made on the basis of binary oppositions such as sacred/profane, raw/cooked, nature/culture.

34
Q

Mediation and Midpoints

A

Through analyzing myths etc. Levi-Strauss sought to find the midpoint between oppositions. In order to do this, he broke the myths into meaningful elements of juxtaposed meaning.

35
Q

Ferdinand de Saussure

A

Linguist who formulated the difference between langue (language in its totality) and parole (speech in use). Saussure argued that langue was not directly accessible but could be inferred from parole. Levi-Strauss worked on the parallel assumption that universal laws of culture (like langue) could be deduced from data obtained from specific cultures (parole).