Chapter 2 Flashcards

0
Q

Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing

A

Selecting questions or forming experiment in a way that leads participates toward a particular answers that supports your hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Bias blind spot

A

Belief we are unlikely to fall prey to the cognitive biases others will
If we notice our view point is different from others we assume we are the objective one and they are bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Empirical Journal Articles

A

Report for the first time results of an empirical research study
Contains details about the study’s method , statistical tests used, numerical results
Must be peer reviewed before being published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Review Journal Article

A

Provides a summary of all the studies done in 1 research field
Sometimes use meta-analysis
Must be peer reviewed before being published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Meta-analysis

A

Combining the results of many studies and give a number that summarizes the magnitude/ effect size of a relationship
Doesn’t allow for bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Abstract

A

Concise summary of an article about 120 words long

Describes the study’s hypothesis, methods, and major results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Introduction

A

1st paragraph explains the topic
Middle paragraphs give theoretical and empirical background
The final paragraph gives specific research questions, goals hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Method

A
Explains in detail hoe researcher conducts their study 
Contains subsections 
-participants 
-materials
-procedure
-apparatus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Results

A

Describes the quantitative and qualitative results
Statistical tests used to analyze the data
Usually provides tables and figures to summarize key results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Discussion

A

1st paragraph sums up research question and methods & how well data supported the hypotheses
Then talk about the contribution this study made
Scientific significance
Discuss alternative explanations for data & ask questions raised in research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Refrences

A

Bibliography listing of all sources the author cited for article

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Theory

A

A comprehensive frame work that summarizes a hypothesis which has undergone rigorous tests and have never been disapproved
Theories are not as easily discarded as hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What makes a good scientific theory

A

Supported by data
Falsifiable
Parsimony ( simpler the better)
Does not prove anything ( can be modified and changed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Basic research

A

Research that is not intended to address a specific problem
Done to enhance the general bod of knowledge
Ex- cognitive psych ( short term memory study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Applied research

A

Research with a practical problem in mind
Applied directly to real world problems
Ex- clinical psych
Treatment outcome studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Example of basic research becoming applied

A

Studies on fear in rats that dissipates with d-cyclosporine

That is translated to extrication of human fear for anxiety

16
Q

Problems with scientific peer review

A

Hard to get unknown unbiased reviewers because small field

Articles only accepted, denied or rejected with invite to revise

17
Q

Differenc between scientific journals and journalism

A

Scientific journals read by experts
Journalism is popular press too
Accessible to everyone

18
Q

Issues in popular press

A

Benefits and risks of journalism coverage
Is the story important
Is it accurate
Is it sensationalized and does it make sweeping conclusions outside the scope of the data

19
Q

Idols of the cave

A

Francis bacons idea
Founded on common errors of individuals nature
“Everyone has a cave or den of his own which refracts and discolors the light of nature “

20
Q

Idols of the tribe

A

Francis bacons ideas
Founded on human nature
A false assertion that the sense of man is the measure of all things

21
Q

Scientific Method

A

A process in which experiments are used to answer questions

22
Q

What’s wrong with experience

A

Experience has no comparison group
No change in independent variables
Experience is confounded
There is another alternative explanation for the findings

23
Q

Confounding variables

A

The object of an experiment is to test whether A influences B
The confounding variable is anything that can lead to a change in B not from A

24
Q

Why does personal experience conflict with research

A

Research is probabilistic
So inferences are there to explain a proportion of cases but not all
There will be outliers and you could be one of them

25
Q

Why is intuition faulty

A

Biased by faulty thinking
Biased by motivation
Researchers include a comparison group to control for confounds and want to evaluate with out bias

26
Q

Why is intuition bias by faulty thinking

A

We will except a conclusion because it makes sense, but that doesn’t mean it’s correct
Things that easily come to mind guide our thinking but aren’t all cases
Focus on positive instances more than negative ones

27
Q

Why would intuition be bias by motivation

A

We focus on evidence we like best
Ask bias questions to get expected answers w/I knowing
Bias about being bias

28
Q

Types of scientific sources

A
Empirical journal articles 
Review journal articles 
Meta-analysis 
Edited books 
Full length books
29
Q

Meta analysis

A

Type of scientific source
A set of statistical procedures for summarizing experimental, quasi experimental and correlational results across independent studies that address a set of related research questions
By accumulating results across studies researchers gain a more accurate representation compared to individual study estimators