Chapter 8- Experimental Designs: Between-Subjects Design Flashcards

1
Q

within-subjects design

A

a research design in which the different groups of scores are all obtained from the same group of participants. Also known as repeated-measures design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

BETWEEN-SUBJECTS DESIGN

A

A research design in which each of the different groups of scores is obtained from a separate group of participants. Also known as an independent-measures design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

between subjects experimental design (independent-measures experimental design)

A

an experimental design using a separate, independent group of individuals for each treatment condition being compared. Also known as an independent-measures experimental design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

individual differences

A

are personal characteristics that differ from one participant to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Individual Differences as Confounding Variables:
Confounding From Individual Differences

A

Individual differences are any participant characteristics that can differ from one participant to another. If these characteristics are different from one group to another, then the experiment is confounded. For example, the participants in one group may be older, smarter, taller, or have higher socioeconomic status than the participants in another group. One group may have a higher proportion of males or a higher proportion of divorced individuals than another group. Any of these variables may produce differences between groups that can compromise the research results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Individual Differences as Confounding Variables:
Confounding From Environmental Variables

A

Environmental variables are any characteristics of the environment that may differ. If these variables are different between groups, then the experiment is confounded by environmental variables. For example, one group may be tested in a large room and another group in a smaller room. Or one group may be measured primarily during the morning and another group during the afternoon. Any such variable may cause differences between groups that cannot be attributed to the independent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

equivalent groups

A

Created equally. The process used to obtain participants should be as similar as possible for all of the groups.

Treated equally. Except for the treatment conditions that are deliberately varied between groups, the groups of participants should receive exactly the same experiences.

Composed of equivalent individuals. The characteristics of the participants in any one group should be as similar as possible to the characteristics of the participants in every other group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

restricted random assignment

A

A random process for assigning individuals to groups that has a limitation to ensure predetermined characteristics (such as equal size) for the separate groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

matching

A

The assignment of individuals to groups so that a specific variable is balanced or matched across the groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

variance

A

A measure of variability obtained by computing the average squared distance from the mean.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

variance within treatments (variance within groups)

A

A measure of the differences between scores for a group of individuals who have all received the same treatment. The intent is to measure naturally occurring differences that have not been caused by a treatment effect. Also known as variance within groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

differential attrition

A

A threat to internal validity that occurs when attrition in one group is systematically different from the attrition in another group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

diffusion

A

A threat to internal validity that occurs when a treatment effect spreads from the treatment group to the control group, usually from participants talking to each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

compensatory equalization

A

A threat to internal validity that occurs when an untreated group demands to receive a treatment that is the same as or equivalent to the treatment received by another group in the research study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

compensatory rivalry

A

A threat to internal validity that occurs when an untreated group learns about special treatment received by another group, then works extra hard to show they can perform just as well as that group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

resentful demoralization

A

A threat to internal validity that occurs when an untreated group learns of special treatment given to another group and becomes less productive and less motivated because they resent the other group’s expected superiority.

17
Q

single-factor two-group design (or two-group design)

A

A research design comparing two groups of participants or two groups of scores representing two levels of a factor. Also known as the two-group design.

18
Q

independent-measures t-test

A

In a between-subjects design, a hypothesis test that evaluates the statistical significance of the mean difference between two separate groups of participants.

19
Q

single-factor multiple-group design

A

A research design comparing more than two groups of participants (or groups of scores) representing more than two levels of the same factor.

20
Q

post hoc test or post test

A

Follow-up hypothesis tests done after an analysis of variance to determine exactly which mean differences are significant.