civil justice process Flashcards

1
Q

class action lawsuits?

A

Individuals who may be able to sue come together against one party. There are restrictions on bringing class actions, and the judge involved must accept that:
* a legitimate class is formed
* that there is a legitimate representative(s) acting for the class, and
* that a remedy is available that will meet the needs of the class.

  • Contingency fees are a sum of money that a lawyer receives as a fee only if the case is won.
  • on the one hand, a large class action suit would have a large contingency fee for the lawyer, but on the other hand, also provides incentive that helps get representation for the class.

Purpose? Hold large corporations accountable with large amounts of resources.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

civil vs. criminal recap

A

Civil
* One party wrongs, other requests compensation
* Society plays no direct role in resolution of dispute
* No public prosecutor; each party hires own council

Criminal
* Victim is at best a witness, but not a party in action
* Society plays a role
* Public prosecutor brings the case in the name of the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

class action lawsuits pros vs cons

A

Pros: number of people involved can show significance of case to the court, more efficient for our court system, strength in numbers, equalize resources on both sides, gets representation for a class who could not otherwise afford it

Cons: low compensation for individuals as so many are compensated for one case, defendants sometimes forced into unjust settlements, meaning corprations simply agree to settlements to get rid of publication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

agent orange class lawsuit 1979

A

judge Weinstein had to decide how funds are disputed. He decided: 1) payment program which gives disabled veterans and families of deceased vets 2) class assistance program which funds continued assistance for members of this class caused cancer during Vietnam war, shows discretion of judge as judge has power to decide how funds are distributed 2.4 million veterans. Fairness hearings, applications for payments from case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Walmart v dukes 2011

A

walmart greeter betty dukes joined together with 5 other women, alleging that company policies result in lower pay for women and longer wait for promotions, estimated class comprised of 1.5 million women and included all women employed by Walmart since December 26 1998.
-Walmart argues that class actions of this size are unmanageable and everyone should file as individuals, 9th circuit upholds class as legitimate. Supreme court reverses lower court opinion unanimously as the women across these Walmart’s are situated too differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

types of civil cases

A
  • Tort- “An area of law that deals with the wrongful actions of an individual or entity, which cause injury to another individual’s or entity’s person, property, or reputation, and which entitle the injured party to compensation.” People are liable for their actions which harm others whether accidental or intentional. Examples: assault, battery, negligence, libel, slander, products liability, trespass, intentional infliction of emotional distress. Slander: verbal, libel: written defamation of character.
    Government officials have less protection from libel because of 1st amendment
  • Contracts- duties imposed by law through voluntary agreements
  • Real property cases- trespass, ownership, rights of way
  • Estates- questions of wills and trusts
  • Domestic relations- one of the largest categories; divorce, custody, adoption
  • Small Claims- provide simpler, faster, and cheaper resolutions for minor disputes. Civil actions valued at 5k or less in NC, can vary depending on state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

one shotters vs repeat players

A

One shotters hardly go to court, only when something serious happens. Repeat players have repeatedly been to court.
* What advantages to repeat players have over one-shotters? Lots of resources, money, experience, works with corporations.
* What is one area where one-shotters appear to be doing relatively well? Why? Personal injury, personal injury lawyers are experienced and inexpensive, so one-shotters do well as they have access to these highly knowledgeable attorneys.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

lawyers and attorneys

A

lawyers tell the client:
-what the law says about the case
-what can happen next in the normal course of events.
-and what the lawyer intends to do about the case.
Must determine whether the client has a case and what the client wants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

civil process step 1: complaints

A

file a civil complaint with the court.

The complaining party:
* identifies the defendant.
* summarizes the facts and the harm suffered.
* explains what remedy is sought.
Defendant has a certain amount of time to file an answer with the court.

If no answer is filed:
* Implies an admittance of liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

step 2: discovery

A

refers to the pre-trial exchange of information by the parties.

It can involve different methods, including:
* Depositions- sworn testimony of witness outside of court, information that can be used by both parties. If witness refuses, they can be subpoenaed.
* Interrogatories- written facts requested.
* Document requests- worked out between attorneys, judge may issue subpoena if information is not turned over.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

step 3: trial

A
  • there is no constitutional right to counsel.
  • There is no federal constitutional right to a jury trial applied to the states.
  • When there are juries, they do decide damages. Other than in capital cases, they rarely decide punishment in criminal matters.
  • Burden of proof is much lower - preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence standard.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

step 4: judgement

A
  • compensatory damages- made to compensate victims, i.e., pay hospital bills, replace property.
  • punitive damages- punishment, i.e., replace things of a high cost. Used when compensatory damages won’t be a deterrent.
  • an injunction- court order to stop action before it happens.
  • a specific performance-
    if an appeal follows, the process is the same for criminal cases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

step 5: execution

A
  • It is particularly important when the losing party is ordered by the court to do something and fails to do so - enforcing judgement.
  • If the order involved monetary damages, then there are avenues for the winning party to pursue, such as:
  • attachment of property of the defendant
  • taking a lien on the property of the defendant
  • garnisheeing his or her wages
  • holding the non-complying party in contempt by the court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

litigation explosion?

A

Refers to supposed tendency of Americans to resort to courts in large numbers. Is this true? While the numbers are high, they are not extreme from a global standpoint. Higher rates of litigation in the past than now. What can cause disparities? Large populations, tend to handle more in court, liberalization of divorce laws in the 1970’s. Bottom line: there is a debate. Perception is that there is one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

tort reforms

A

Tort reform attempts to introduce changes to the tort system to either reduce the number of cases brought or reduce the possible damages that can be awarded.
What are Tort Tales? Adds to dialogue about tort reform

4 components:
1. short cases (which may or may not be true
2. emphasize poor judgment by the victim
3. he blamelessness of the defendant
4. greed as the motivating factor.

Reforms: Cap the amount someone can earn from a lawsuit, cap punitive damages, cap contingency fees, abolish joint liability, be stricter on the formation of class action, fee shifting (winner pays losers fees).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

BMW v. Gore (1996)

A

Gore received new vehicle from BMW dealership. New vehicle had been painted before he got it. He sues BMW, stating they committed fraud as they did not inform him that his car had been repainted. Alabama jury verdict awarded gore 4 million in punitive damages and 4k in compensatory damages, BMW appeals, claiming it violates 14th amendment right to due process. to and Alabama supreme court denies appeal, however they reduced punitive damages to 2 million. It goes up to u.s. supreme court, in 5-4 decision they rule it is excessive but does not tell what is reasonable.

-500 to 1 ratio is unreasonable.

17
Q

State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Campbell (2002)

A

Curtis Campbell caused car accident, one person died, and another was permanently disabled. State farm insurance contested liability went to trial for Campbell and lost. Campbell sued state farm, stated that they should have just paid out the accident instead of taking it to trial. Goes up to supreme court, is an award of 145 million punitive damages when compensatory is 1 million excessive?

Court says yes.
-Anything more than 9-1 is probably excessive.

18
Q

Philip Morris USA v. Williams (2006)

A

67-year-old died after life of smoking 3 packs of cigarettes a day. Widow sues Phillip Morris, stating that he and his company mislead public about dangers of smoking. Court awards 79.5 million punitive damages and judge reduces, referencing BMW case stating that ratio is unreasonable. Oregon court reinstates 75 million, eventually moves to u.s. supreme court as Morris appeals. He argues company should not be punished on behalf of smokers who are not party to the suit.

Issue: can company be held liable for non-parties; can 9-1 ratio be overridden for these things?

Ruling: award cannot be overridden, declines to rule on excessive amount.

19
Q

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)

A

The concept of alternatives to the formal courts has been around ever since there have been courts.
Objectives:
* to provide a faster, cheaper, and better-quality system of dispute resolution.

20
Q

ADR Processes

A
  • Conciliation- looks over facts, suggests possible solutions. Non-binding, idea of finding solution before court. Often doesn’t bring parties together.
  • Mediation- brings parties together with mediator who facilitates negotiations between parties before going to court. Non-binding.
  • Arbitration- non-binding or binding, most often binding. Typically have to agree with solution, more formal than mediation. How formal is usually decided by parties, adversarial tone where arbitrators listen to both sides arguments and witnesses.
  • Processes like trial procedures- neighborhood justice centers, not a formal court process, drug courts attached to formal courts, rent-a-judge business where parties rent judge (often retired judge) to hear and decide a dispute.
21
Q

civil attorneys consider:

A
  • Assess whether going to court will be worth the time, effort, expense and hassle.
  • Litigation tends to exacerbate conflict between the parties, so if there is a relationship between the two they may want to avoid litigation if they want to keep relationship intact i.e. marriage/divorce; business partnerships
  • Real world costs – a completely rational party will file suit only if the benefits of winning exceed the costs of losing.
22
Q

pre trial motions civil

A
  • a motion for a more definite statement.
  • a motion to dismiss.
  • or a motion for a summary judgment.