Cog Final Flashcards
How emotions relate to cognitions
Historically in cog info processing paradigms affect was treated as a source of disruption or noise
Types of influence:
Cognitive antecedents of affect (cognitive bases that influence emotion)
Cognitive consequences of affect (affect influencing how we process information)
Past affective states can be interpreted through appraisal-like processes
Cognitive processes determine emotional reactions
AND
Affective states influence how people remember, perceive, interpret situations, and make decisions
7 steps of perceptual process
- Stimulus in the environment
- Light is reflected and focused
- Receptor processes
- Neural processing
- Perception
- Recognition
- Action –> Step 1
Good continuation
Gestalt principle
Lines are seen as following the smoothest path
Pragnanz
Gestalt Principle
Every stimulus is seen as simply as possible
Similarity
Gestalt Principle
Similar things are grouped together
Proximity
Gestalt Principle
things that are near to each other are grouped together
Common fate
Gestalt Principle
things moving in the same direction are grouped together
Common region
Gestalt principle
elements in the same region tend to be grouped together
Uniform Connectedness
Gestalt Principle
connected region of visual properties are percieved as a unit
Properties of figure and groudn
The figure is more “thinglike” and more memorable than the ground.
The figure is seen in front of the ground.
The ground is more uniform and extends behind figure.
The contour separating figure from the ground belongs to the figure (border ownership).
Perceiving scenes
Information within the image determines perception-grouping.
Areas lower in the field of view are more likely to be perceived as a figure.
Gibson and Peterson experiment
-Figure-ground formation can be affected by the meaningfulness of a stimulus.
Role of inference in perception
Theory of unconscious inference
Created by Helmholtz (1866/1911) to explain why stimuli can be interpreted in more than one way
Likelihood principle: objects are perceived based on what is most likely to have caused the pattern
Modern researchers use Bayesian inference that take probabilities into account.
Discrete emotions theory
Small number of basic/core emotions
Different biological bases
Serve different evolutionary functions
Panas
Scales to measure one’s experience of positive and negative affect
As we develop, we tend to experience more positive and less negative affect
Carstensen’s Socioemotional Selectivity Theory
Other contributing factors to affect
We are also interested in how affect influences how we appraise and interact with our environment (antecedent) and how we remember and reflect on it (consequent)
Factors such as age, individual difference variables, mental health status, if there’s a time limitation can influence how we interact with both positive and negative (affective) information in the environment (relative to neutral or non-emotional information)
Scanning a scene
Visual scanning – looking from place to place
Fixation
Saccadic eye movement
Overt attention involves looking directly at the attended object.
Covert attention refers to attention without looking.
What directs our attention
Characteristics of the scene:
Visual salience: areas of stimuli that attract attention due to their properties
Color, contrast, and orientation are relevant properties.
Attentional capture
Cognitive factors of attention
Picture meaning and observer knowledge
Attention can be influenced by a person’s goals
Timing of when people look at specific places is determined by the sequence of actions involved in the task.
Selective Attention
- texting and driving example
- you successfully selectively attend to driving if you ignore incoming texts while driving
- you are deliberately prioritizing one task at the expense of another
Divided Attention
- aka multitasking
- perhaps task switching?
- we deliberately attempt to attend to two tasks at once (and we aren’t very good at it-despite believing otherwise)
- trying to text AND drive is really texting sometimes, driving other times
- with a limited attentional system, this is really hard (impossible?) to truly do
Change blindness
Observers were shown a picture with and without a missing element in an alternating fashion with a blank screen.
Results showed that the pictures had to alternate a number of times before the change was detected.
When a cue is added to show where to attend, observers noticed the change more quickly.
Emotion and Attention
Many change blindness studies use neutral objects, but emotions hold particular relevance for us
-Emotional objects can be attention grabbing in and of themselves
-Negative objects may be especially noticeable
-Age-related influences to consider- positivity bias- older adults tend to gravitate toward positive information/ younger adults toward negative information
-The type of change matters- is it appearing or disappearing?
Puppy appearing vs. disappearing
Armed intruder appearing vs. disappearing
Also complicates top-down and bottom-up processing
Sensory Memory
Initial stage that holds all incoming information for seconds or fractions of a second
The retention, for brief periods of time, of the effects of sensory stimulation.
-Information decays very quickly
Persistence of vision: retention of the perception of light
- Sparkler’s trail of light
- Frames in film
Holds large amount of information for a short period of time
- Collects information
- Holds information for initial processing
- Fills in the blank
Short-term memory
Holds five to seven items for about 15 to 20 seconds (makes sense in practical terms because we often don’t need to memorize more than 7 items)
Includes both new information received from the sensory stores and information recalled from long-term memory
Bi-directional with LTM
Long-term memory
Can hold a large amount of information for years or even decades
Anything longer than 30 seconds
Encoded by hippocampus
Control Processes (memory)
active processes that can be controlled by the person
Rehearsal
Strategies used to make a stimulus more memorable
Strategies of attention that help you focus on specific stimuli
Capacity of Sensory Memory
Measuring the capacity and duration of sensory memory (Sperling, 1960)
Array of letters flashed quickly on a screen
Participants asked to report as many as possible
Whole report method: participants asked to report as many as could be seen
Average of 4.5 out of 12 letters (37.5%)
Proactive interference
short-term memory problem
occurs when information learned previously interferes with learning new information
Example: Your native language may make it more difficult to learn and remember a new foreign language
Retroactive Interference
occurs when new learning interferes with remembering old learning
Example: After you get a new telephone number and use it for a while, you may have difficulty remembering your old phone number
Chunking
Short term memory technique
small units can be combined into larger meaningful units
Chunk is a collection of elements strongly associated with one another but weakly associated with elements in other chunks
Phone numbers are a good example
Working Memory
limited capacity system for temporary storage and manipulation of information for complex tasks such as comprehension, learning, and reasoning
WM has trouble when similar types of information are presented at the same time
Vogel et al. (2005) results:
High-capacity participants were more efficient at ignoring the distractors
Phonological Loop
How to get visual and auditory information into the short term memory store
Visuospatial sketch pad
How to get visual and spatial information into short term memory store
Phonological similarity effect
Letters or words that sound similar are confused
Word-length effect
Memory for lists of words is better for short words tahn for long words
Take longer to rehearse long words and to produce them during recall
Episodic Buffer
Backup store that communicates with LTM and WM components
Hold information longer and has greater capacity than phonological loop or visuospatial sketch pad
Serial Position
Evident in Murdoch LTM study
Items at the beginning of the list (primacy effect) and end of the list (recency effect) people remember more
Episodic memory
type of declarative LTM
memory for personal events
Involves mental time travel (no guarantee of accuracy)
Episodic can be lost, leaving only semantic
Semantic Memory
type of declarative LTM
facts and knowledge
Does not involve mental time travel (general knowledge)
Can be enhanced if associated with episodic
Autobiographical memory
Memory of specific experience
Can include semantic and episodic memory
Personal semantic memory
semantic memories that have personal significance
Implicit/non-declarative
Type of LTM
Unconscious memory that influences behavior
- Procedural (skill) memory
- Classical conditioning
- Priming: previous experience changes response without conscious awareness
Explicit/declarative
Type of LTM
Unconcious memory
Episodic: personal events/episodes
Semantic: facts/knowledge
Maintenance rehearsal
Repetition of stimuli that maintains info but does not transfer it to LTM
Elaborative rehearsal
Using meanings and connections to help transfer info to LTM
Levels of processing theory
Memory depends on how info is encoded
Degree to which info is processed affects how likely it is to be encoded
Shallow processing: no attention to meaning, focus on physical, poor memory
Deep processing: close attention to meaning, better memory
Other factors that aid encoding memories
Visual imagery
Self-reference effect
Generation effect
Organizing to-be-remembered information (ex: keeping info thematic)
Relating words to survival value (ex: deciding how useful something is on a desert island)
Retrieval practice
Having a mental framework for item ahead of time
Testing effect (memory)
Being tested on material improves memory better than rereading material
Roediger and Karpicke (2006)
Retrieval cue
Cue that helps retrieve information from LTM
Retrieval cues most effective when created by person who uses them
Encoding specificity
More similar test and study environment is better people will perform (can be mood, noise level, location, etc.)
Matching environment serves as a cue
Consolidation
Transforms new memories from fragile state to more permanent state
- Synaptic consolidation occurs at synapses, happens rapidly
- Systems consolidation involves gradual reorganization of circuits in brain
Muller and Pilzecker (1900)
Long-term potentiation (LTP)
Memory/information storage at the synapse
Enhanced firing of neurons after repeated stimulation
Structural changes and enhanced responding over time
Multiple trace hypothesis
Questions the assumption that the hippocampus is important only at the beginning of consolidation
The hippocampus has been shown to be activated during retrieval of both recent and remote memories (Gilboa et al., 2004)
The response of the hippocampus can change over time (Viskontas and coworkers, 2009)
Reminiscence Bump
Participants over the age of 40 asked to recall events in their lives
Memory is high for recent events and for events that occurred in adolescence and early adulthood (between 10 and 30 years of age)
Self-image hypothesis:
- Memory is enhanced for events that occur as a person’s self-image or life identity is being formed
- People assume identities during adolescence and young adulthood
Memory for emotional stimuli
Emotional events remembered more easily and vividly
Emotion improves memory, becomes greater with time (may enhance consolidation)
Brain activity in amygdala
Weapons focus: tendency to attend to a weapon during a crime
Flashbulb memories
Memory for circumstances surrounding shocking, highly charged important events (ex: 9/11)
Flashbulbs are not “photograph” memories, as they can change with the passage of time
These memories can be inaccurate or lacking in detail even though participants report that they are very confident and that the memories seem very vivid
Rimelle and coworkers (2011)
-Memories for negative emotional pictures were stronger, and associated with greater confidence
Narrative rehearsal hypothesis: repeated viewing/hearing of event through media and talking with others
Bartlett’s “war of the ghosts” experiment
Example of how memory is constructive
Had participants attempt to remember a story from a different culture over and over again
Results:
Over time, reproduction became shorter, contained omissions and inaccuracies
Changed to make the story more consistent with their own culture
Source monitoring
Source memory: process of determining origins of our memories
Source monitoring error: misidentifying source of memory
Also called “source misattributions”
Cryptoamnesia
Unconscious plagiarism of another’s work due to a lack of recognition of its original source
Example of source monitoring error
Making inferences
Memory can be influenced by inferences that people make based on their experiences and knowledge
Memory often includes information that is implied by or is consistent with the to-be-remembered information but was not explicitly stated
Schemas and Scripts
Schema: knowledge about some aspect of the environment
Script: conception of sequence of actions that usually occurs during a particular experience
Schemas and scripts influence memory (Memory can include information not actually experienced but inferred because it is expected and consistent with the schema)
Advantages of construction of memory
Allows us to “fill in the blanks” - mental shortcut, efficient
Cognition is creative
Understand language
Solve problems
Make decisions
Disadvantages of construction of memory
Sometimes we make errors
Sometimes we misattribute the source of information
Was it actually presented, or did we infer it?
Misinformation effect
misleading information presented after a person witnesses an event can change how that person describes the event later
aka misleading postevent information (MPI)
False memories
When someone has a memory of something that never happened because of an external influence (e.g. an experimenter recounting personal events but adding information)
Errors in eyewitness testimony
Errors due to suggestion (suggestive questioning)
Misinformation effect
Confirming bias/feedback (we focus on the memory/information that supports our idea of what happened instead of the truth)
Eyewitness testimony: what is being done?
Inform witness perpetrator might not be in lineup
Use “fillers” in lineup similar to suspect
Use sequential presentation (not simultaneous)
Improve interviewing techniques